Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
explain to me...
Don Jacob:
anyone who argues for goal tending either didn't watch the entire game or is ignoring the fact that gasol's shot was gaoltending by dwight howard when he stuck his arm through the net.
it's like van gundy said, you can't expect to refs to get every call right, or even call the game how they see.....the only thing you can ask is that they stay consistent with their play calling.
so by that standard no one should be lobbying for a goal tend at the end of that game.
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on June 08, 2009, 07:27:46 PM ---i don't think a ref in the league has the balls to make a game deciding call on a questionable call.
can you imagine the chaos it would cause if he called goaltending & the series was tied 1-1.
--- End quote ---
The NBA has kind of fucked itself really. I mean, any ref would have been completely right on making that call. However, theyve historically "let them play" on final shots. So if you start to call things by the book now, every single team that has ever lost on one of those non-calls at the buzzer will now bitch. Oddly enough, no team would ever come forward and claim they won from one of those non-calls lol
thisoneguy360:
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on June 08, 2009, 09:17:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on June 08, 2009, 07:27:46 PM ---i don't think a ref in the league has the balls to make a game deciding call on a questionable call.
can you imagine the chaos it would cause if he called goaltending & the series was tied 1-1.
--- End quote ---
The NBA has kind of fucked itself really. I mean, any ref would have been completely right on making that call. However, theyve historically "let them play" on final shots. So if you start to call things by the book now, every single team that has ever lost on one of those non-calls at the buzzer will now bitch. Oddly enough, no team would ever come forward and claim they won from one of those non-calls lol
--- End quote ---
No doubt
Tay:
My guess is that those guys are looking for anything to talk about and create controversy, that's all they do. By the rules it's a goaltend, but that shouldn't be called because it didn't affect the shot, especially at that juncture of the game. I think it's dumb to create that kind of skepticism, and if they wanted to take that angle, they should have gone for some better stuff. That's a reach.
Antonio:
It wasn't goaltending, lol. Loosers.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version