Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Hollingers All Time Greatest Franchise's (NBA)

<< < (5/5)

Rick McCrank:
it's their 30th appearance

Now_Im_Not_Banned:

--- Quote from: Lefty Gomez on June 12, 2009, 08:38:40 PM ---
--- Quote from: Don Jacob on June 12, 2009, 06:41:24 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lefty Gomez on June 12, 2009, 05:25:04 PM ---making the Lakers #1 is like putting the Cardinals ahead of the Yankees for the best MLB team ever LOL


gotta go with the most titles, not a team that's below .500 in NBA finals appearances

--- End quote ---

they're not below.500

and the lakers and celtics are within 2 championships of each other, meaning that there's more in between  to eclipse that . the lakers' all time big man line up includes the best great big man in every era. they have the logo, and the best pg in there as well.

the cards are NOT even a tenth of the organization the lakers are....maybe if you combined the cards, dodgers, a's, and red sox you'd have a more accurate comparison.

--- End quote ---

WRONG


lakers are 14-17 in 31 appearances

about to go 15-17 my friend




--- End quote ---


we have 15 titles. :-* 16 after this one...

OG Hack Wilson:
non NBA titles don't count

and 17 >15 or 14

Now_Im_Not_Banned:

--- Quote from: Lefty Gomez on June 12, 2009, 10:01:21 PM ---non NBA titles don't count

and 17 >15 or 14

--- End quote ---


our titles mean more, because their were more teams when we won em...what dont u get about that? LOL

.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:

--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 12, 2009, 10:15:04 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lefty Gomez on June 12, 2009, 10:01:21 PM ---non NBA titles don't count

and 17 >15 or 14

--- End quote ---


our titles mean more, because their were more teams when we won em...what dont u get about that? LOL

--- End quote ---

lol this argument will go nowhere. I can see both of your points. Celtics with more titles, but it IS harder to win when there are more teams.  Who gives a shit, its kind of a toss up.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version