Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
John Barry just said...
Chamillitary Click:
Tim Legler has said if Jordan never took that break he would have won 8 with the Bulls.
but John's opinon > Tim's right? :laugh:
"THE" MoSav:
--- Quote from: Shallow on June 16, 2009, 09:16:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on June 16, 2009, 08:52:47 PM ---The whole greatest argument is great, you know why.... 'cause in this boards opinion means SHIT! Barbershops, water coolers, internet threads. Fans can have this conversation, it'll take up time and at the end of the day, you can't prove shit. Ali vs Tyson, Kobe vs. MJ, Nolan Ryan vs. Babe Ruth, better coach Red or Phil, Dr. J in a dunk off with Dominic Wilkins, Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Sugar Ray Leonard, '80's 49ers driving last minute in the 70's Steelers for the win, Tiger vs Nicklaus. This are never going to happen, but they bring debate, people want to have an opinion, and fans will argue with a passion for their team, their fighter. NIK will argue for the Gold and Forum Blue, Hack will defend his Yankees, I will go with Ali no matter what, it's just what it is. And it can be a message board, barbershop or water coolers at work (I don't have a water cooler... haha) but this is what fans do.
--- End quote ---
I can get caught up in it too but in the end I never take it too seriously. I honestly have no clue how Rocky Marciano would if plucked out of his time and put in to today's boxing scene. I don't know who'd had more majors if Jack and Tiger played at the same time. Or what kind of player MJ would have been in 1965.
The problem I have is when people outside the venue of basic bullshitting take their opinions home with them and actually believe in them as fact. Don't know why it bothers me. It just does.
--- End quote ---
thats a lie. You'll argue for Manning over Brady till the death...
Shallow:
--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on June 17, 2009, 03:28:14 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on June 16, 2009, 09:16:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on June 16, 2009, 08:52:47 PM ---The whole greatest argument is great, you know why.... 'cause in this boards opinion means SHIT! Barbershops, water coolers, internet threads. Fans can have this conversation, it'll take up time and at the end of the day, you can't prove shit. Ali vs Tyson, Kobe vs. MJ, Nolan Ryan vs. Babe Ruth, better coach Red or Phil, Dr. J in a dunk off with Dominic Wilkins, Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Sugar Ray Leonard, '80's 49ers driving last minute in the 70's Steelers for the win, Tiger vs Nicklaus. This are never going to happen, but they bring debate, people want to have an opinion, and fans will argue with a passion for their team, their fighter. NIK will argue for the Gold and Forum Blue, Hack will defend his Yankees, I will go with Ali no matter what, it's just what it is. And it can be a message board, barbershop or water coolers at work (I don't have a water cooler... haha) but this is what fans do.
--- End quote ---
I can get caught up in it too but in the end I never take it too seriously. I honestly have no clue how Rocky Marciano would if plucked out of his time and put in to today's boxing scene. I don't know who'd had more majors if Jack and Tiger played at the same time. Or what kind of player MJ would have been in 1965.
The problem I have is when people outside the venue of basic bullshitting take their opinions home with them and actually believe in them as fact. Don't know why it bothers me. It just does.
--- End quote ---
thats a lie. You'll argue for Manning over Brady till the death...
--- End quote ---
Of course I will because they play at the same time. I never said I don't take debating sports too seriously. I take it very seriously. I just don't take cross-era debates too seriously. Like Manning vs Montana. Different eras different environments, and different groundwork to build off of. I think Manning is head and shoulders above Brady because their careers are parallel with each other and Manning showed me twice the talent with half the team (defense, coaches, o-line etc.). I don't think The Colts would have gone 5-11 with out Manning this year, much less 11-5. Why'd you have to go and get me started? If you really want to go through ths again just start another thread. I don't want to pollute this one.
"THE" MoSav:
--- Quote from: Shallow on June 17, 2009, 03:57:24 PM ---
--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on June 17, 2009, 03:28:14 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on June 16, 2009, 09:16:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on June 16, 2009, 08:52:47 PM ---The whole greatest argument is great, you know why.... 'cause in this boards opinion means SHIT! Barbershops, water coolers, internet threads. Fans can have this conversation, it'll take up time and at the end of the day, you can't prove shit. Ali vs Tyson, Kobe vs. MJ, Nolan Ryan vs. Babe Ruth, better coach Red or Phil, Dr. J in a dunk off with Dominic Wilkins, Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Sugar Ray Leonard, '80's 49ers driving last minute in the 70's Steelers for the win, Tiger vs Nicklaus. This are never going to happen, but they bring debate, people want to have an opinion, and fans will argue with a passion for their team, their fighter. NIK will argue for the Gold and Forum Blue, Hack will defend his Yankees, I will go with Ali no matter what, it's just what it is. And it can be a message board, barbershop or water coolers at work (I don't have a water cooler... haha) but this is what fans do.
--- End quote ---
I can get caught up in it too but in the end I never take it too seriously. I honestly have no clue how Rocky Marciano would if plucked out of his time and put in to today's boxing scene. I don't know who'd had more majors if Jack and Tiger played at the same time. Or what kind of player MJ would have been in 1965.
The problem I have is when people outside the venue of basic bullshitting take their opinions home with them and actually believe in them as fact. Don't know why it bothers me. It just does.
--- End quote ---
thats a lie. You'll argue for Manning over Brady till the death...
--- End quote ---
Of course I will because they play at the same time. I never said I don't take debating sports too seriously. I take it very seriously. I just don't take cross-era debates too seriously. Like Manning vs Montana. Different eras different environments, and different groundwork to build off of. I think Manning is head and shoulders above Brady because their careers are parallel with each other and Manning showed me twice the talent with half the team (defense, coaches, o-line etc.). I don't think The Colts would have gone 5-11 with out Manning this year, much less 11-5. Why'd you have to go and get me started? If you really want to go through ths again just start another thread. I don't want to pollute this one.
--- End quote ---
LOL@ Bad coaching
Shallow:
--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on June 17, 2009, 04:00:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on June 17, 2009, 03:57:24 PM ---
--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on June 17, 2009, 03:28:14 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on June 16, 2009, 09:16:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on June 16, 2009, 08:52:47 PM ---The whole greatest argument is great, you know why.... 'cause in this boards opinion means SHIT! Barbershops, water coolers, internet threads. Fans can have this conversation, it'll take up time and at the end of the day, you can't prove shit. Ali vs Tyson, Kobe vs. MJ, Nolan Ryan vs. Babe Ruth, better coach Red or Phil, Dr. J in a dunk off with Dominic Wilkins, Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Sugar Ray Leonard, '80's 49ers driving last minute in the 70's Steelers for the win, Tiger vs Nicklaus. This are never going to happen, but they bring debate, people want to have an opinion, and fans will argue with a passion for their team, their fighter. NIK will argue for the Gold and Forum Blue, Hack will defend his Yankees, I will go with Ali no matter what, it's just what it is. And it can be a message board, barbershop or water coolers at work (I don't have a water cooler... haha) but this is what fans do.
--- End quote ---
I can get caught up in it too but in the end I never take it too seriously. I honestly have no clue how Rocky Marciano would if plucked out of his time and put in to today's boxing scene. I don't know who'd had more majors if Jack and Tiger played at the same time. Or what kind of player MJ would have been in 1965.
The problem I have is when people outside the venue of basic bullshitting take their opinions home with them and actually believe in them as fact. Don't know why it bothers me. It just does.
--- End quote ---
thats a lie. You'll argue for Manning over Brady till the death...
--- End quote ---
Of course I will because they play at the same time. I never said I don't take debating sports too seriously. I take it very seriously. I just don't take cross-era debates too seriously. Like Manning vs Montana. Different eras different environments, and different groundwork to build off of. I think Manning is head and shoulders above Brady because their careers are parallel with each other and Manning showed me twice the talent with half the team (defense, coaches, o-line etc.). I don't think The Colts would have gone 5-11 with out Manning this year, much less 11-5. Why'd you have to go and get me started? If you really want to go through ths again just start another thread. I don't want to pollute this one.
--- End quote ---
LOL@ Bad coaching
--- End quote ---
LOL@confusing coaching with a Dungy vs Bellichick debate. Dungy is great, but career vs career the Pats had a much better line up of coaches (all coaches, not just head coaches) than the Colts. It's not even close. Moore wasa run of the mill OC in Pit for 7 years. Then more mediocrity with the Viks in the early 90s. He did ok with Detroit but Barry was there. And on D, you going to compare Ron Meeks to Crennel? Good luck. Just face it. That amazing team went 11-5 with that bitch Brady on the beach.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version