Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Fantasy Football discussion 2009-2010 motherfuckers
OG Hack Wilson:
not me
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: Ted J. G. on August 27, 2009, 05:39:44 PM ---
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on August 27, 2009, 04:14:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ted J. G. on August 27, 2009, 01:42:20 PM ---
--- Quote from: HACK WILSON on August 26, 2009, 05:51:18 PM ---why trade your QB's??
QB is the most important position
--- End quote ---
Right now I have Rivers, Roethlisberger, and Flacco. Rivers will most likely have the better season statistically, so that leaves me with 2 backups. I can keep Boethlisberger and switch between the 2 QBs based on weely matchups, or I can keep Flacco as Rivers' backup.
--- End quote ---
One thing to think about is who your backups play on Rivers bye week. Luckily, Flacco plays at home against Cincy and Big Ben is on the road at Detroit...so I guess thats a wash. I say hold onto all three, Rivers should be your starter...and either Flacco or Big Ben will emerge at the better QB, somebody in the league will become desperate for a starter...and you can swoop in with a trade.
--- End quote ---
Sounds good, but is it really in your best interest to tell me this?
--- End quote ---
im not in that league....so i dont care lol
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: HACK WILSON on August 27, 2009, 05:36:08 PM ---
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on August 27, 2009, 05:34:06 PM ---
--- Quote from: HACK WILSON on August 27, 2009, 04:50:21 PM ---Brees/Warner = lots of points
--- End quote ---
Yeah, but id still go RB before QB...as long as you have one of the top 5 picks. Really, unless you get one of the top 4 or 5 QBs...u might as well hold off an pick up more RBs. I say Brees, Brady, Manning (not Eli), maybe Mcnabb, Aaron Rogers, maybe Romo. I didnt get any of those QBs which is why in my first draft I just picked up another RB so I had two very good backs. Shit, I even started drafting receivers before picking up my QB. I think I got my QB in the 5th or 6th round.
--- End quote ---
well you can enjoy havin great RBs and wack QBs and bein stuck behind Hack all year :D
--- End quote ---
Im not in your league....lol but Id rather have ONE wack QB starting with 2 great RBs....then ONE great QB with 2 wack RB's. I dunno if your point system in that league is all fucked up where QB's are rewarded more then backs. But there is a reason people typically pick up RBs first...and sometimes WR's before QBs.
OG Hack Wilson:
if y our not in my league then why am i talking to you
our league stats make it so QB's can be worth just as much as a RB or WR
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: HACK WILSON on August 27, 2009, 05:52:25 PM ---if y our not in my league then why am i talking to you
our league stats make it so QB's can be worth just as much as a RB or WR
--- End quote ---
lol how many points for QB? 6 for a TD, 25 yrds per point? -2 for an INT?? For your sake, I hope its way better then that even...or youre gonna get fucked with the RB group u have lol
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version