Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

the official "will the Raiders go 0-16" thread

<< < (4/7) > >>

Primo:
Seymour played well last night. Can't say the same for Jamarcus.

"THE" MoSav:
if they keep running the ball and playing defense like that they will win 5-6 games, i think SD was sloppy but the Raiders played well, did you people watch the game?  ???

DJ SUGAFREE QUIK:

--- Quote from: Blunt Tyme on September 14, 2009, 04:50:10 PM ---i wouldnt b surprised if any players kill themselves for bein on such a shit team

--- End quote ---
;D LMFHO! +1 on that.  If they're not a do it themselves kinda people, they can have somebody kill them for them in the streets of oakland late night on every weekend.  Hang out in the hood late at night. Messed up though, not supposed to be funny :(  If they were supposed to go 0-16 it shoulda happened 3 years ago but the Steelers chose to play a still injured Big Ben, & Zona team who's not sorry enough to go 0-16, but sorry enough to lose to someone that should go 0-16.  2006 & 1996.  The Lions have the best chance of going 0-32 even.  They're only winnable games are against the Rams & both Ohio teams. 

.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:

--- Quote from: THE PIED PIPER on September 14, 2009, 02:05:07 PM ---oakland is a effing mess




and Daygostyle you know nothing about football...you can't have a running game without opening up the pass   (just ask the late Bill Walsh)


raiders got no passing game

--- End quote ---

LOL @ you claiming somebody knows nothing about football. Cant have a running game without opening up the pass?? WTF?!  Do you even watch football?  Are you gonna tell me its commonplace for teams to try and set up their running game with their PASSING game first? LOL!!!. Yes, because youo hear many an offensive coordinator say..."we gotta establish the pass"...not..."we gotta establish the run".  Man, you need to study up on the game.  You establish the run first, THAT opens up the passing game. Ask any coach, and OC, anyBODY lol.  There are rare occasions (Cardinals) where their running game is so bad and their passing game is so good that they HAVE to do the opposite. But thats completely unconventional and the reason they dont have a chance and making the Superbowl again. Go back to NFL 101 man...

.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:

--- Quote from: THE PIED PIPER on September 15, 2009, 09:56:37 AM ---giants = 9 titles in 80 years


raiders = 3 in 50 years



lol @ oakland fans on this forum, how delusional!



--- End quote ---

LOL at you trying to make your team seem like something its not. For one, the Giants have 3 Superbowl titles...same as us. The other "World Titles" that you talk about, were before the Raiders were even in the NFL...and how many teams were there? lol. You guys went 30 fuckin years without a "World Title", and were a bottom feeder for what....20 years?! lol. We've only been bad these last 6 yrs.  Before that, in 40 yrs we only had 7 losing seasons. lol Should we count how many the Giants had? We have a higher winning percentage all time then the Giants...oh, and btw we're 7-3 all time against the Giants.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page