Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Who gets the best of this Fantasy Football trade?!

<< < (2/4) > >>

elmizzy:
yes your analysis is correct. although i wouldnt say ochocinco is that much of an upgrade from roy williams. i purposely stayed away from both of those guys completely in my league

OG Hack Wilson:

--- Quote from: theog on October 02, 2009, 08:19:49 AM ---yes your analysis is correct. although i wouldnt say ochocinco is that much of an upgrade from roy williams. i purposely stayed away from both of those guys completely in my league

--- End quote ---


esp since chad ADMITS that he wasnt going to score a TD in the "other endzone" at green bay bc he didnt have any ppl there waiting for him


what a bum

elmizzy:
no way. i cant imagine him purposely admitting that. maybe not go through with the lambeau leap, but saying he wasnt gonna score?

.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:

--- Quote from: theog on October 02, 2009, 08:19:49 AM ---yes your analysis is correct. although i wouldnt say ochocinco is that much of an upgrade from roy williams. i purposely stayed away from both of those guys completely in my league

--- End quote ---

Yeah, talentwise they are close IMO. All Im looking at is productivity...and even more so, how much they are getting thrown to. Ocho has been targetted 7, 11, and 11 times in the first 3 games. Roy, for the first three games has only been thrown to 7, 4, and 7 during the first three games.  Romo is really only going to Witten, and distributing the ball all over the place after that. Ocho is the first option always in Cincy.  I dunno, we'll see what happens.

"THE" MoSav:
ocho is a great upgrade..carson will only get better and Ocho is his number 1 target unlike Roy Williams..Hes also got big play potential that roy doesnt have...and grant is long term where as sproles wont even get the carries when LT is back, even when he starts he doesnt get a ton of carries Rivers throws 40-50 times a game

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version