Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

better at their peak? albert pujols or frank thomas

(1/2) > >>

OG Hack Wilson:
thomas 1994-1997:  .339 batting average, .463 on-base percenage, .638 slugging %, 46 HR per 162 games, 140 RBI per 162 games, 138 walks per 162 games , 186 OPS+  (adjusted OPS to the rest of the league)


or Pujols 2006-2009: .335 batting, .431 onbase %, .637 slugging %, 44 HR per 162 games, 131 RBI per 162 games, 110 walks per 162 games, 178 OPS+  

PLANT:
Nobody was better than the Big Hurt when he was in his prime

S P I C E:

--- Quote from: PLANT on October 21, 2009, 01:40:20 AM ---Nobody was better than the Big Hurt when he was in his prime

--- End quote ---

You mean as a right handed power hitter right?  Because Griffey and Bonds were obviously better overall players than Frank Thomas ever was, or Pujols for that matter of course.

Chamillitary Click:
yeah, Barry Bonds no question lol.

but i guess stats show that Frank was better, but who said Pujols reached his peak yet? :o :P

OG Hack Wilson:
top "primes" in baseball history:


babe ruth 1919-1932
ted williams 1941-1957  (missed 4.5 season due to war time)
ty cobb 1907-1920
lou gehrig 1926-1937 (pre lou gehrigs disease years)
mickey mantle 1955-1964
barry bonds 2000-2005 (the steroid years)
arod 1996-2009  (steroids used in atleast 3 years)
willie mays 1954-1967
honus wagner 1900-1913
frnak thomas 1990-1999

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page