Lifestyle > Train of Thought
British Admit: Copenhagen Is All About Genocide
David Mack:
http://www.larouchepac.com/print/12763
December 13, 2009 (LPAC)—The official British policy for the Copenhagen conference is now out, in explicit language: Massive population genocide, on a scale that would make Adolf Hitler blush. The London School of Economics, the anchor of the Fabian Gordon Brown government, has produced a study for Copenhagen, released by the British organization Optimum Population Trust (OPT), calling for the reduction of world population by between three to five billion people between now and 2050. This flagrant call for mass extermination is based on the argument that the single greatest cause of global warming is over-population, and that the most "cost-effective" cure for global warming is radical population reduction.
According to a recent OPT study, the so-called global warming crisis can be solved, most cheaply, by reducing the world population by 500 million between now and 2050. Since linear population projections put world population at well-over 9 billion by that date, the proposal to cut back world population to just over 6 billion people, would mean the elimination of 3 billion people. Indeed, an OPT press release, dated March 16, 2009, titled "Earth Heading for 5 Billion Overpopulation?" reported, "Based on ecological footprint and biolgoical capacity data which have become available over the last decade, OPT estimates the world's sustainable population currently at 5 billion and the U.K.'s at 18 million (the U.K.'s actual current population is 61 million).
"However," the release continued, "these figures are predicated on present levels and patterns of consumption. Greener lifestyles in the U.K. could push up its sustainable population; by contrast, if the world as a whole grows richer and consumes more, this will reduce the planet's carrying capacity. If present trends continue, by 2050, when the UN projects world population will be 9.1 billion, there will be an estimated 5 billion more people than the Earth can support."
A later OPT report, prepared for Copenhagen, called "Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost," spelled out London's solution: Place population reduction at the top of the agenda. OPT "called on climate change negotiators to ensure that population restraint policies are adopted by every state worldwide to combat climate change."
The UNFPA, the United Nations Population Fund, gave its de facto blessing to this mass murder scheme on Nov. 18, when they featured Optimum Population Trust director Roger Martin, as a presenter of the UN's own "State of World Population 2009" report, a document geared to the now-ongoing Copenhagen conference on global warming. While the UN report, itself, makes the same link between global warming and population growth, it is the OPT study and its "Pop Offsets" program of targeted population reduction in the world's poorest countries, that defines the true London agenda at Copenhagen. It is the agenda spelled out, repeatedly, by the Royal Consort Prince Philip, for decades: Reduce the world population by 80 percent, create a global feudal dictatorship, eliminating the nation-state system altogether.
Westcoastin':
Its a controversial topic.. its up to our generation to basically decide whether our species survives or collapses. Our population has grown at an exponential rate for the last 300 years... its obvious that we are reaching the Earth's carrying capacity.. There are only so many nutrients in the land/ocean to support the food chain..and we're taking them out at an unprecedented rate. Until we have the technology to colonize other planets, our only option is to stabilize our birth rate or will will inevitably see a dramatic population collapse.
The only solution I can see is to adopt a global one-child policy. It has had some success in China.. The downside is there has been widespread forced abortions, sterilizations, corruption etc. But really its our only option, there must be a way of doing it ethically.
Maybe offering the first-born free education/health care if the parents have a historectimy/vasectomy after the birth... or giving free education to couples who choose not to have kids at all. The problem is how to punish couple who 'accidentally" have 2nd or 3rd kids... a $$ fine might have to be good enough. The money can go towards green initiatives. The rich get to have more kids.. Problem?? Fuck that, at least they can support the families.. and eventually they arent so rich anymore because the money gets spread out over more descendants. Its bullshit that the poorest families in the world have the highest birthrate.. when they have no hope of supporting so many kids. (I know in some cases they dont have access to birthcontrol.. thats something that needs to be addressed) Obviously I'm against genocide and exterminations... but our current global birthrate isnt sustainable
How can a child-limiting policy be enforced on a global scale? A binding international treaty? A global government? I dont know.. but if there's a better idea out there.. I'd like to hear it
If we don't bring our population to a sustainable level.. Mother Earth will do it for us.. with disease and starvation.
also.. I thought i'd point out that if all humans became vegetarians... the Earth could support waaaaaaaaay more people, every step up the food chain loses 90% of the energy - thats a simple biological fact.
David Mack:
--- Quote from: Westcoastin' on December 16, 2009, 10:49:54 PM ---Its a controversial topic.. its up to our generation to basically decide whether our species survives or collapses. Our population has grown at an exponential rate for the last 300 years... its obvious that we are reaching the Earth's carrying capacity.. There are only so many nutrients in the land/ocean to support the food chain..and we're taking them out at an unprecedented rate. Until we have the technology to colonize other planets, our only option is to stabilize our birth rate or will will inevitably see a dramatic population collapse.
The only solution I can see is to adopt a global one-child policy. It has had some success in China.. The downside is there has been widespread forced abortions, sterilizations, corruption etc. But really its our only option, there must be a way of doing it ethically.
Maybe offering the first-born free education/health care if the parents have a historectimy/vasectomy after the birth... or giving free education to couples who choose not to have kids at all. The problem is how to punish couple who 'accidentally" have 2nd or 3rd kids... a $$ fine might have to be good enough. The money can go towards green initiatives. The rich get to have more kids.. Problem?? Fuck that, at least they can support the families.. and eventually they arent so rich anymore because the money gets spread out over more descendants. Its bullshit that the poorest families in the world have the highest birthrate.. when they have no hope of supporting so many kids. (I know in some cases they dont have access to birthcontrol.. thats something that needs to be addressed) Obviously I'm against genocide and exterminations... but our current global birthrate isnt sustainable
How can a child-limiting policy be enforced on a global scale? A binding international treaty? A global government? I dont know.. but if there's a better idea out there.. I'd like to hear it
If we don't bring our population to a sustainable level.. Mother Earth will do it for us.. with disease and starvation.
also.. I thought i'd point out that if all humans became vegetarians... the Earth could support waaaaaaaaay more people, every step up the food chain loses 90% of the energy - thats a simple biological fact.
--- End quote ---
But who are we to play the role of God? If this one child policy is adopted, do you think the elite and powerful will adopt this policy? Hell Naw. It will be the poor and average joes gettin their balls pinched. What makes the elite have this right over everyone else? Just cuz they got money and power? I think many countries are overpopulated but many countries are underpopulated such as Canada, Russia, parts of Europe and Africa. I think its vastly exaggerated just so the elite can carry on with their operations of Eugenics and world domination. Why don't they outright come out and say the world is too populated? Why are they hiding behind Global Warming? Deception just shows how evil the men behind the curtain really are and how they try to play God's role.
virtuoso:
It doesn't get any more hard core than the government controlling life itself, fuck these fantatics wet dreams.
However some people are clearly begging for tyranny so let them sign a pledge and be bound by it.
LooN3y:
isnt this part of agenda 21? overpopulation is a big problem, but when it comes down to it the western democracies are probaly the last thatll be hit with a nationwide starvation.
but i think the whole vegeterian thing is gonna happen later on in a 500 or 1000 years, its already known that in 50 or 100 years beef is going to be luxury because of the cattle and human population ratios. chickens going to be basically the main meat on the market.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version