Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Chris Johnson 2009 Highlights (Through Week 15)

<< < (3/7) > >>

Chamillitary Click:


and he's still a child.

Lunatic:

--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on December 25, 2009, 05:08:13 PM ---

and he's still a child.

--- End quote ---
And CJ is even younger

162 yards to 2,000, let's do it!

Shallow:

--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 25, 2009, 07:06:32 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on December 25, 2009, 05:08:13 PM ---

and he's still a child.

--- End quote ---
And CJ is even younger

162 yards to 2,000, let's do it!

--- End quote ---


Barring injury or a superstar defensive performance by the Seahawks he'll get 2000, but 2000 yards on a losing team will be enough for maybe a shared MVP. Yes every other 2000 yard back has gotten MVP and if the Colts lose one of the next two games CJ might back door his way in there, but no way will or should a losing team 2000 yard back beat out a 16-0 team's QB when that QB is playing like Peyton has played this year.

edit - I forgot Jamal Lewis never got it for his 2000 yard season and his team made the playoffs. So no way is CJ getting it unless he breaks the record.

Lunatic:
^Honestly, I don't even care if he gets MVP anymore. I just want to see him get 2,000 yards. Watching him do that really shows you how difficult it really is to get 2,000. He's been beyond belief all season long and he still needs 128 to get 2,000 (something I think he'll easily accomplish against Seattle next week).

8-8 and 2,000 yards, he won't get MVP but man oh man, what a year it's been like watching him. As a rookie I said he's gonna be a top back in the NFL. I didn't know the next year he'd already be the best in the league.

It'd be awesome if he went off next for 234 and broke the record.

white Boy:

--- Quote from: Shallow on December 25, 2009, 07:24:24 PM --- but 2000 yards on a losing team will be enough for maybe a shared MVP.

--- End quote ---

i dunno about that

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version