Weis signs onto the Chiefs (Crennel's coming too)

[Shallow]

Look out for a big increase in Cassel's production next year. And rumoura aboutr Crennel signing as DC mrean look out for the Chiefs in the next few years.


http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8158df28&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true

[Chamillitary Click]

you still need players to win.

[Shallow]

you still need players to win.

They have 11-5 Matt Cassel.

[Chamillitary Click]

you still need players to win.

They have 11-5 Matt Cassel.

i thought QB's couldn't win games...

[Shallow]

you still need players to win.

They have 11-5 Matt Cassel.

i thought QB's couldn't win games...

I thought they could...

[Chamillitary Click]

you still need players to win.

They have 11-5 Matt Cassel.

i thought QB's couldn't win games...

I thought they could...

that's a joke lol.

all i've ever said is Tom Brady has 3 rings; is it or is it not a FACT Tom Brady owns 3 Super Bowl rings?

[Shallow]

you still need players to win.

They have 11-5 Matt Cassel.

i thought QB's couldn't win games...

I thought they could...

that's a joke lol.

all i've ever said is Tom Brady has 3 rings; is it or is it not a FACT Tom Brady owns 3 Super Bowl rings?

The same amount of rings on Charlie Weis's hand.

Look, here has been my theory for a long time. I started by saying Brady was only seen as elite because of the system he was in, and a great system can make a good QB a great one, and a poor system can make a good QB a bad one. Brady got injured and I said they'd go 11-5 or 12-4, the week it happened. People laughed at me. Well they went 11-5. The next year when all the trades took place I said Cassel would crumble, Cutler would suffer, and Orton would excel. Everything happened as I said it would. No one gave me credit, but that's fine. Now I am saying that Cassel will excel once again under Weis because Weis's whole deal is creating an offense that excels despite lack of individual talent. Cassel knows the Weis system and Weis knows that. The only thing that I can see changing my opinion is if Weis decides in training camp that Croyle is the way to go, or makes a play for Quinn. But if Cassel starts the season with the Chiefs next year, he will play unless he gets injured and he will have a year like he had in 08.

How the team does will depend on how the defense changes. But the offense of the Chiefs next year with Weis, Cassel, and Charles will be amazing. I'm calling it now. We'll see by this time next year if I can notch another I told you so on my belt or if I will say I was wrong, which I do every time I am wrong.

[Shallow]

Looks like Crennel is on board now too. My Patriots theory of victory will now be put to the ultimate test. Chiefs make the playoffs and Cassel performs the whole way and I want a lot of "you were right"s from all that questioned me. They win an SB and I will whip out my cock for all you to suck for the rest of my days on dubcc.

[Chamillitary Click]

Looks like Crennel is on board now too. My Patriots theory of victory will now be put to the ultimate test. Chiefs make the playoffs and Cassel performs the whole way and I want a lot of "you were right"s from all that questioned me. They win an SB and I will whip out my cock for all you to suck for the rest of my days on dubcc.

and then after that, one BILLION posts of how much Cassel is terrible & how Peyton would go 19-0 on that team, etc, etc.

could of sworn the sport was played for the win.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/IMk5sMHj58I" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/IMk5sMHj58I</a>

[Shallow]

^^^^^^^^^^^^


What does any of that have to do with my theory? Peyton doesn't play to win? Caldwell sure doesn't in weeks 15 and 16, but Peyton was playing to win. I've said otherwise?

[Chamillitary Click]

^^^^^^^^^^^^


What does any of that have to do with my theory? Peyton doesn't play to win? Caldwell sure doesn't in weeks 15 and 16, but Peyton was playing to win. I've said otherwise?

you shit on Brady because of the system he plays in.

if the coach says, "do this, we'll win", you expect him to do otherwise? never understood why you always gave him such grief because he listened to his coach lol.

[Shallow]

^^^^^^^^^^^^


What does any of that have to do with my theory? Peyton doesn't play to win? Caldwell sure doesn't in weeks 15 and 16, but Peyton was playing to win. I've said otherwise?

you shit on Brady because of the system he plays in.

if the coach says, "do this, we'll win", you expect him to do otherwise? never understood why you always gave him such grief because he listened to his coach lol.

I don't give him grief for that. My problem with the guy in "do this, we'll win" is that "this" only applies to certain things. Manning functions the same way. He was brought in to Indy and told "do this, we'll win". Manning's "this" was throw amazing passes to covered WRs under pressure from pass rushers. Brady's "this" was throw screens to WRs and let complicated blocking schemes gain yardage. My argument is simple. As it stands it's 3SBs to 1 SB, 4 MVPs to 1 MVP. If they switched teams it would be 4 or 5 SBs to ZERO SBs and 5 MVPs to ZERO MVPs. Because I believe that Manning can do Brady's "this" all day, and when the other "this" is needed to win he could do that too. While I don't think, and it's because I've seen him crumble when he had to(like in SB against NYG, AFC Champ against Indy, Divisional against Den, and last week against Balt), Brady can do Manning's "this". No one ever argued that Scott Pioli and Bill Bellicheck didn't build a better team than Polian, Mora, and Dungy. I don't think Indy could have broken .500 once this decade with out Manning. I did think NE could win 11 games with out Brady. I was right. I can't prove Indy would lose all year, but my insight should count for something.

[Chamillitary Click]

^but my argument is that if Peyton came up in New England, he would be running the offense that actually works to win Super Bowls & you wouldn't see his amazing arm.

it doesn't work in all ways that just happen to fit your argument lmao.

if they switched, maybe Tom Brady would be trash in Indy; but Peyton would be throwing screens in New England & you would be shitting on Peyton Manning...for winning lol.

[TraceOneInfinite]

It's great to see that Shallow has made such lofty predictions for the Chiefs and Matt Cassell.  Hey, I'm on board with you because the Chiefs are my team, sounds like you've made some pretty accurate predictions so I hope your right again.

I also thought it was interesting that Cassel went 11-5 last year, and Brady only went 10-6 this year with basically all the same team. 

And Shallow, you predicted that Cassel would crumble, which is technically true because he had a rough year.  But I saw every game the Chiefs played this year, and it was NOT Cassel's fault.  THE CHIEFS LEAD THE LEAGUE IN DROPPED PASSES AND IN SACKS GIVEN UP.  So how can a quarterback operate when your team is leading in such categories?  Also, Larry Johnson was still the Chiefs started running back for the first half of the season, and the GUY ONLY AVERAGED 2.7 YARDS A CARRY!!  So no threat of a running game for most of the season, all the recievers and tightends except Dwayne Bowe were cut from other teams and picked up by the Chiefs over the course of the season, scrubs like Bobby Wade, Mark Bradley and Lance Long were starters for the Chiefs at different points in the season.  Also, two of the starting linemen were also brought in off the streets after being cut from their respective teams during the season.

So when you consider what Matt Cassel had to contend with I would say he did great last season.  And don't worry about Croyle being a threat at starter because that guy has never been any good and is like 0-9 as a starter.

...................

Also, on defense, YES THE CHIEFS GOT CRENNELL.  This is a great move.  But are you predicting the Chiefs to be in the playoffs?  That's a little too ambitious, I think 8-8 is a more practical expectation.

[TraceOneInfinite]

you still need players to win.

Have you seen Jamal Charles?