Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Kurt Warner = the best playoff QB i've ever seen
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: Special Agent Jaydc M.D. on January 13, 2010, 04:55:11 AM ---I think hes definitely over looked in discussions.
--- End quote ---
people used to think Mike Martz made Warner
look at whats happened to the 2 since....i'd say Warner made Martz
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 13, 2010, 05:58:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: Special Agent Jaydc M.D. on January 13, 2010, 04:55:11 AM ---I think hes definitely over looked in discussions.
--- End quote ---
people used to think Mike Martz made Warner
look at whats happened to the 2 since....i'd say Warner made Martz
--- End quote ---
Faulk was more valuable than both. They use Faulk in 01 and they beat NE. Arizona has Faulk (in his prime) last year and they beat Pit. Warner's tops in my book. Always was. But when his team is uninspired he suffers big time. He's great to have on a solid team. But I haven't seen him put a bad hurting team on his back and lift them the way I've seen Brees or Manning do. But when the team is playing good Kurt plays better.
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Shallow on January 13, 2010, 06:55:57 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 13, 2010, 05:58:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: Special Agent Jaydc M.D. on January 13, 2010, 04:55:11 AM ---I think hes definitely over looked in discussions.
--- End quote ---
people used to think Mike Martz made Warner
look at whats happened to the 2 since....i'd say Warner made Martz
--- End quote ---
Faulk was more valuable than both. They use Faulk in 01 and they beat NE. Arizona has Faulk (in his prime) last year and they beat Pit. Warner's tops in my book. Always was. But when his team is uninspired he suffers big time. He's great to have on a solid team. But I haven't seen him put a bad hurting team on his back and lift them the way I've seen Brees or Manning do. But when the team is playing good Kurt plays better.
--- End quote ---
Faulk cleary & two Pro-Bowl/HOF WR's in Holt & Bruce.
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: Shallow on January 13, 2010, 06:55:57 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 13, 2010, 05:58:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: Special Agent Jaydc M.D. on January 13, 2010, 04:55:11 AM ---I think hes definitely over looked in discussions.
--- End quote ---
people used to think Mike Martz made Warner
look at whats happened to the 2 since....i'd say Warner made Martz
--- End quote ---
Faulk was more valuable than both. They use Faulk in 01 and they beat NE. Arizona has Faulk (in his prime) last year and they beat Pit. Warner's tops in my book. Always was. But when his team is uninspired he suffers big time. He's great to have on a solid team. But I haven't seen him put a bad hurting team on his back and lift them the way I've seen Brees or Manning do. But when the team is playing good Kurt plays better.
--- End quote ---
i love marshall faulk....i tell ppl he's the best weapon in NFL history. but you can't dismiss them necessarily and say it was all Faulk's team...did you see Faulk on the Colts before the Rams?? a great back but averages a yard less per carry.
you also had Tory Holt and Isaac Bruce, two future HOFers too. and Ricky Proehl.
Warner is the one who made it to a SB on 2 diff teams...and played the position where you get the ball every play (therefore making you more important lol)
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 13, 2010, 08:28:57 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on January 13, 2010, 06:55:57 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 13, 2010, 05:58:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: Special Agent Jaydc M.D. on January 13, 2010, 04:55:11 AM ---I think hes definitely over looked in discussions.
--- End quote ---
people used to think Mike Martz made Warner
look at whats happened to the 2 since....i'd say Warner made Martz
--- End quote ---
Faulk was more valuable than both. They use Faulk in 01 and they beat NE. Arizona has Faulk (in his prime) last year and they beat Pit. Warner's tops in my book. Always was. But when his team is uninspired he suffers big time. He's great to have on a solid team. But I haven't seen him put a bad hurting team on his back and lift them the way I've seen Brees or Manning do. But when the team is playing good Kurt plays better.
--- End quote ---
i love marshall faulk....i tell ppl he's the best weapon in NFL history. but you can't dismiss them necessarily and say it was all Faulk's team...did you see Faulk on the Colts before the Rams?? a great back but averages a yard less per carry.
you also had Tory Holt and Isaac Bruce, two future HOFers too. and Ricky Proehl.
Warner is the one who made it to a SB on 2 diff teams...and played the position where you get the ball every play (therefore making you more important lol)
--- End quote ---
Wait a second here. The Colts were a joke of a team when Faulk was there. They never had a stable pass game or defense and were coming from behind so much his rushing would take a hit. In Manning's rookie year Faulk had 2227 scrimmage yards with 1300 rush and 900 pass. The next year the 13-3 Colts had James run 1500 and put up 2139 total. I truly believe Faulk would have out them over the top and made them win it all. With Faulk they would have beaten the Titans and the Jags and in the Superbowl it probably would have been the Bucs because I think Faulk's 2 TDs in the Vikings game is what made the difference. But if it was the Rams I don't see the Faulkless Rams beating the Colts with Faulk.
Still love Kurt though.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version