Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

The NY Knickerbockers

<< < (3/3)

Chamillitary Click:

--- Quote from: Teddy Roosevelt on February 21, 2010, 11:25:28 AM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on February 21, 2010, 11:09:59 AM ---it's a shame though that everybody is so money hungry, like the millions they make aren't enough to set them for life; endorsements pays LeBron more than the Cavs do lol; but if they weren't money hungry & the four of them played together for five million a piece; they could win legit, the next eight years in a row; but you watch, there is a good chance all four of these names end up in different places because of money. :-\

--- End quote ---
Yes they make more in a year then most people do in a lifetime, but they can only get paid until their 40 (if they are lucky). The money they make now, has to last them around 30 years after they play. In those 30 years, they still want to a very well off life, so they try to earn as much possible now while they still can. And if I were one of them I wouldn't want to play with the other 3 together. It would take any and all competition away, and they'd be playing for nothing. There would be no challenge, since they know they are going to win. That's not the heart of a competitor. If you were playing on the playground, would you want all the best players and beat everyone by 30 points or would you want the teams to be a little more even and make it a challenge?

--- End quote ---

i know what you're sayin'; & on the playground, i like to keep things close but in the back of my mind know that i'm going to win. :P

but if they are serious about winning as they say, they might as well do what's nessessary.

it would be a team that would that people will remember until the end of time as the greatest team ever.

it would ruin the NBA though lol.

Turf Hitta:

--- Quote from: LooN3y on February 21, 2010, 11:12:57 AM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on February 21, 2010, 11:09:59 AM ---^LOL, i didn't mean the team the Bucks; i mean, he'll be looking for money if he plays good.

T-Mac is looking to win, but if he finishes the rest of the reason averaging 25 ppg & is showing shades of his old self; he's only 29, he's got some years left in him; he's going to get paid on a winning team.

if the Knicks sign two major all-stars; like LeBron, Wade, Bosh or Amare, i don't know if they will be able to afford T-Mac.

it's not like they would need T-Mac if they got two of the four guys i mentioned, but T-Mac is a nice fit anywhere.

if LeBron wins or even if he gets to the Finals, i don't see him leaving, unless it's to team up with Wade or Bosh.

Wade's as good as gone unless they can sign a big name for him.

& Amare & Bosh, in my mind, are going to follow Wade & LeBron.

it's a shame though that everybody is so money hungry, like the millions they make aren't enough to set them for life; endorsements pays LeBron more than the Cavs do lol; but if they weren't money hungry & the four of them played together for five million a piece; they could win legit, the next eight years in a row; but you watch, there is a good chance all four of these names end up in different places because of money. :-\

--- End quote ---


I'm a dickless faggot ass gook.


--- End quote ---

yes you are.

DJ SUGAFREE QUIK:

--- Quote from: wcsoldier on February 20, 2010, 02:39:38 PM ---yeah they have a huge cap space but it's not easy to basically rebuild a whole roster from scratch (only 3 players still will be under contract as of 7/1/10)

I doubt that any superstar is going to sign with the Knicks if at that time he has no guarantee of having strong help around him

the Knicks as a organisation has been a joke for 10 years , a town like NY needs a great team , the NBA needs it too , but at the end they're going to fuck it up and still will suck

--- End quote ---
NY got the Yankees they can't have everything now >:(  They're the no.1 team in that city not the Bricks.  In the 80's the NBA was better & the Bricks were not much of a factor then.  Tired of certain media idiots acting like they're more of a storied franchise than even the Lakers & Celtics combined.  Shoot, the Bulls during the Jordan years were more of a storied franchise than the Bricks.  Yeah they had the early 70's. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page