Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Garnett sucks now, Rondo is sensational
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Hans Moleman on June 09, 2010, 09:03:23 PM ---KG sucks because he dropped 25 points?
--- End quote ---
did u read what i said?
you gon always be my latin queen bitch:
he dont suck......hes dope when he can be
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
He's sick. But I would definintely not consider him the best PG in the league lol. Like they were talkin about on ESPN radio, fans just pay attention to whats happening at THIS moment. Rondo is in the finals...so people build him up more than they normally would. If Paul was in the finals people would be raving about him as the best PG. I would definitely still take Paul over Rondo. Williams over Rondo. Probably Rose over Rondo. I still think Nash is better (just old). Parker and Rondo are somewhat of a wash to me.
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on June 12, 2010, 05:32:32 PM ---He's sick. But I would definintely not consider him the best PG in the league lol. Like they were talkin about on ESPN radio, fans just pay attention to whats happening at THIS moment. Rondo is in the finals...so people build him up more than they normally would. If Paul was in the finals people would be raving about him as the best PG. I would definitely still take Paul over Rondo. Williams over Rondo. Probably Rose over Rondo. I still think Nash is better (just old). Parker and Rondo are somewhat of a wash to me.
--- End quote ---
why would you take Paul over Rondo so quickly?
Deron Williams I can put over Rondo because of his size advantage but Paul? he has nobody on his team besides David West so his stats look great
but Rondo is in the same class of PG's without developing a true jump shot yet (at age 23 mind you). he's got plenty of time to improve on that and transform into the next Gary Payton
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: Hans Moleman on June 12, 2010, 09:22:38 PM ---
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on June 12, 2010, 05:32:32 PM ---He's sick. But I would definintely not consider him the best PG in the league lol. Like they were talkin about on ESPN radio, fans just pay attention to whats happening at THIS moment. Rondo is in the finals...so people build him up more than they normally would. If Paul was in the finals people would be raving about him as the best PG. I would definitely still take Paul over Rondo. Williams over Rondo. Probably Rose over Rondo. I still think Nash is better (just old). Parker and Rondo are somewhat of a wash to me.
--- End quote ---
why would you take Paul over Rondo so quickly?
Deron Williams I can put over Rondo because of his size advantage but Paul? he has nobody on his team besides David West so his stats look great
but Rondo is in the same class of PG's without developing a true jump shot yet (at age 23 mind you). he's got plenty of time to improve on that and transform into the next Gary Payton
--- End quote ---
mainly because he is better lol. Stats mean nothing...so the fact that Paul has no one on his team only helps my argument. Williams would be better than Rondo even he was the same size. The thing is, PGs like Rondo and Parker are VERY good. And could compete for best in the league. But as of right now, their teams dont NEED them. Take Parker or Rondo off the Spurs and Celtics and those teams can still compete. They wont be as good, obviously....but they wont be HORRIBLE. Take Williams off the Jazz or Paul off the Hornets...and those two teams completely fall apart. They cant function without them. Just watch all of them play. Paul and Williams are much more IN CONTROL of their team and the offense.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version