Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Favre to retire
westsiderider323:
hes old 40 years old i dont blame him for thinkin bout retiring he has a fucked up ankle thats not healin as fast as a young player's ankle would football is a collision sport and i think that his body cant really take much more
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on August 05, 2010, 11:59:06 PM ---Rodgers was the better QB? Favre had arguably his best statistical season last year & lead his team to the NFC game & won an ESPY for "Play of the Year" (I know, but still lol).
MAYBE this coming season, if Brett comes back, Rodgers will have a better year; but if we're talking about last year, Favre >>> Rodgers.
--- End quote ---
Favre had probably the best year of his career last year. No arguing how great of a year he had. But you have to consider a couple of things.
Yds TDs Ints
Rodgers 4434 30 7
Favre 4202 33 7
Rodgers threw for more yards, Brett threw more TD's. But Rodgers uses his legs alot as well and ran for 5 TD's. Brett obviously ran for none. Also take into consideration the conditions. Id be willing to bet if they switched places Rodgers would have killed Favre statistically. Rodgers had no offensive line, he got POUNDED last year and still put up those numbers. His team had a good defense, but not as good as the Vikes. And clearly Favre had the better running game to work with. Rodgers did all of this with opposing defenses mostly playing the pass.
So yeah, u could argue either way as to who had the better year. My thing is, Rodgers did it with almost no help. Rodgers was Lebron on the Cavs while Favre was Kobe on the Lakers. ;D
you gon always be my latin queen bitch:
Damn lookin at those numbers makes u realize how dope rodgers is...and brett
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on August 06, 2010, 11:26:25 AM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on August 05, 2010, 11:59:06 PM ---Rodgers was the better QB? Favre had arguably his best statistical season last year & lead his team to the NFC game & won an ESPY for "Play of the Year" (I know, but still lol).
MAYBE this coming season, if Brett comes back, Rodgers will have a better year; but if we're talking about last year, Favre >>> Rodgers.
--- End quote ---
Favre had probably the best year of his career last year. No arguing how great of a year he had. But you have to consider a couple of things.
Yds TDs Ints
Rodgers 4434 30 7
Favre 4202 33 7
Rodgers threw for more yards, Brett threw more TD's. But Rodgers uses his legs alot as well and ran for 5 TD's. Brett obviously ran for none. Also take into consideration the conditions. Id be willing to bet if they switched places Rodgers would have killed Favre statistically. Rodgers had no offensive line, he got POUNDED last year and still put up those numbers. His team had a good defense, but not as good as the Vikes. And clearly Favre had the better running game to work with. Rodgers did all of this with opposing defenses mostly playing the pass.
So yeah, u could argue either way as to who had the better year. My thing is, Rodgers did it with almost no help. Rodgers was Lebron on the Cavs while Favre was Kobe on the Lakers. ;D
--- End quote ---
I love the old man though. 8)
But if you put it like that, we all know LeBron >Kobe.
you gon always be my latin queen bitch:
Haha u luv the old man...thats tuff n james bein better than kobe
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version