Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
The G.O.A.T has spoken part 2
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 19, 2010, 04:16:33 PM ---Comparing the Lakers losing when they were the 7th seed to Cleveland losing when they were the clear-cut favorites to win is a joke, in its own.
--- End quote ---
LOL, you saying this is a joke, in its own.
LeBron still won 60 games before they even got Jamison; he was alone with Big "I'm an old 10 & 7 player" Z & Mo "I like to chuck" Williams; HE WENT TO THE FINALS WITH DANIEL GIBSON LOL.
Getting Jamison only helped them win six more games, then was irrelevant in the playoffs.
Bottom line, Kobe had the same shit LeBron had & only won 40 games & was called a ballhog & was threatening to leave, but didn't because they stole Pau Gasol. You denying any of what I just said is BEYOND ridiculous lmfao.
Sccit:
^if you really think that a lower seed which was EXPECTED to lose losing is the same as a higher seed EXPECTED to win losing, then you are possibly dumber than i thought. on top of that, kobe in '06 had 0 other all-stars on his squad, along with d-league level talent starting for the team...smush parker was the starting point guard, luke walton was the starting small forward, and kwame brown was the starting center...the fact that you compare that team to LeBron's team, which was hailed by most as "the best team in the league" before they disappointed is proof for everyone what a fucking moron you are. LOL
And you do know the Lakers were the best team in the league the year they acquired Gasol PRIOR to the acquisition, midway through the season, right? probably didn't considering you don't know shit, but yea...
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 20, 2010, 02:55:13 PM ---^if you really think that a lower seed which was EXPECTED to lose losing is the same as a higher seed EXPECTED to win losing, then you are possibly dumber than i thought. on top of that, kobe in '06 had 0 other all-stars on his squad, along with d-league level talent starting for the team...smush parker was the starting point guard, luke walton was the starting small forward, and kwame brown was the starting center...the fact that you compare that team to LeBron's team, which was hailed by most as "the best team in the league" before they disappointed is proof for everyone what a fucking moron you are. LOL
And you do know the Lakers were the best team in the league the year they acquired Gasol PRIOR to the acquisition, midway through the season, right? probably didn't considering you don't know shit, but yea...
--- End quote ---
Just take LeBron's team in '06. He wasn't expected to go to the Finals, but he did, alone; Kobe couldn't do it alone.
& not this season, but the season before. Still 60 wins, expected to win, sure. But LeBron was still all alone. You're a straight up hater (obviously) if you're going to deny that 60 wins alone was nothing special. Obviously they were favorites with 60 wins, but LeBron won all those games.
What a joke lmfao.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on August 20, 2010, 04:51:01 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 20, 2010, 02:55:13 PM ---^if you really think that a lower seed which was EXPECTED to lose losing is the same as a higher seed EXPECTED to win losing, then you are possibly dumber than i thought. on top of that, kobe in '06 had 0 other all-stars on his squad, along with d-league level talent starting for the team...smush parker was the starting point guard, luke walton was the starting small forward, and kwame brown was the starting center...the fact that you compare that team to LeBron's team, which was hailed by most as "the best team in the league" before they disappointed is proof for everyone what a fucking moron you are. LOL
And you do know the Lakers were the best team in the league the year they acquired Gasol PRIOR to the acquisition, midway through the season, right? probably didn't considering you don't know shit, but yea...
--- End quote ---
Just take LeBron's team in '06. He wasn't expected to go to the Finals, but he did, alone; Kobe couldn't do it alone.
& not this season, but the season before. Still 60 wins, expected to win, sure. But LeBron was still all alone. You're a straight up hater (obviously) if you're going to deny that 60 wins alone was nothing special. Obviously they were favorites with 60 wins, but LeBron won all those games.
What a joke lmfao.
--- End quote ---
ok, moron
teecee:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 24, 2010, 02:40:32 AM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on August 20, 2010, 04:51:01 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 20, 2010, 02:55:13 PM ---^if you really think that a lower seed which was EXPECTED to lose losing is the same as a higher seed EXPECTED to win losing, then you are possibly dumber than i thought. on top of that, kobe in '06 had 0 other all-stars on his squad, along with d-league level talent starting for the team...smush parker was the starting point guard, luke walton was the starting small forward, and kwame brown was the starting center...the fact that you compare that team to LeBron's team, which was hailed by most as "the best team in the league" before they disappointed is proof for everyone what a fucking moron you are. LOL
And you do know the Lakers were the best team in the league the year they acquired Gasol PRIOR to the acquisition, midway through the season, right? probably didn't considering you don't know shit, but yea...
--- End quote ---
Just take LeBron's team in '06. He wasn't expected to go to the Finals, but he did, alone; Kobe couldn't do it alone.
& not this season, but the season before. Still 60 wins, expected to win, sure. But LeBron was still all alone. You're a straight up hater (obviously) if you're going to deny that 60 wins alone was nothing special. Obviously they were favorites with 60 wins, but LeBron won all those games.
What a joke lmfao.
--- End quote ---
ok, moron
--- End quote ---
If he's a moron, how many games will the Cavs win this year, then? After all, Jamison and Williams are top notch all stars, right? The east is mad weak, right?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version