It's August 28, 2025, 04:01:27 PM
& to the people saying Crook sounds old - he is old. He's been in the game in since the mid 90's. He is "Old School" - all these records people are fiending for IE - untouchable, C Style Records tracks etc, were made in the 90's. It's past the 90's now, but more importantly - it's almost past another decade too.... People need to realise - Crooked I ain't making it, no matter how many hot tracks he does for Dre, no matter how many mixtapes he does, or how many relationships he conceals. It's over for him in terms of hitting big time. Rappers need to be in their 20s to break out mainstream, and as a Crooked I fan, I don't like to say that, but it's true
Quote from: wballz187 on August 20, 2010, 02:33:44 PMhe sounds old sayin shit like thatdoes any1 actually know how old Crooked I actually is?everyone seems to bullshit about his age and wikipedia constantly changes so i dunno what to believe.
he sounds old sayin shit like that
those rhymes he was spittin at the end were straight fire
Quote from: mickaveli2001 on August 20, 2010, 07:27:40 PM& to the people saying Crook sounds old - he is old. He's been in the game in since the mid 90's. He is "Old School" - all these records people are fiending for IE - untouchable, C Style Records tracks etc, were made in the 90's. It's past the 90's now, but more importantly - it's almost past another decade too.... People need to realise - Crooked I ain't making it, no matter how many hot tracks he does for Dre, no matter how many mixtapes he does, or how many relationships he conceals. It's over for him in terms of hitting big time. Rappers need to be in their 20s to break out mainstream, and as a Crooked I fan, I don't like to say that, but it's trueI think everyone knows this. Its time for Crooked I to realize this so he can actually put an album out and stop waiting for an opportunity that's never going to come.
I hate when people say shit like this.There are plenty of albums from this past decade that would get the same praise, if not more, if they were dropped between '90-'97."Oh, it's a near classic"; back in the 90's that phrase wasn't even a thought lol. Shit was just labeled classic, there were no internet forums to people to nit-pick every last detail about an album.GangstaBoogy got it right; people won't admit that newer things are better than older things.I can admit that there are artists that are wack, undoubtedly; but to say "nobody can hang with them" is stupid.
^Today's artists are developing newer things; but the second they do, everybody runs, points fingers & says "That's so wack, Tupac is turning over in his grave".Let's face it, "hood life" or "thug life" or whatever you want to call it, isn't an unlimited, infinite topic; eventually, everything that needed to have been said, will have been said & then all you got is people repeating themselves.So basically, if you're a rapper today you're one of two things;1. Somebody trying to have a unique sound & it's "wack".2. Somebody trying to duplicate old records from the 90's & it's either "wack" or "blah, whatever; it's not as good as the 90's".If you look into lists of "The Greatest Albums of All-Time", the last album to consistantly show up on people lists is "The Marshall Mathers LP"; a majority of people put that in their Top 10 & if it doesn't make the Top 10, it gets high recognition as a undeniable classic.So what happened after that release? Was there some private meeting among rap fans saying "Alright, no more classics"; because if you look at it, impact is IMPOSSIBLE to acheieve 2010, so basically there can never be another classic again lol.All you hear is "great album" or "oh, it's a personal classic, but I understand this isn't allowed to be in the discussion of 'greatest albums', I just like it a lot".I'm not denying that better albums came out in the 90's, I'm not saying Nas/Pac/Cube/Wu/etc. in their 90's prime isn't better than almost anyone from today; just I don't like how ANY album from today is automatically second to 90's albums, just because of "impact".
Thats actually NOT true. At their best: guys like Joe Budden, Crooked I, Game, Eminem, and a few others are better than a lot of the vets that people give praise too. People just don't like the idea of admitting someone new is better than someone old, just like in basketball most fans won't admit Kobe is top 10 cuz they hate the idea of seeing him ahead of legends like Jerry West or Wilt Chamberlain.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on August 23, 2010, 02:08:55 PM^Today's artists are developing newer things; but the second they do, everybody runs, points fingers & says "That's so wack, Tupac is turning over in his grave".Let's face it, "hood life" or "thug life" or whatever you want to call it, isn't an unlimited, infinite topic; eventually, everything that needed to have been said, will have been said & then all you got is people repeating themselves.So basically, if you're a rapper today you're one of two things;1. Somebody trying to have a unique sound & it's "wack".2. Somebody trying to duplicate old records from the 90's & it's either "wack" or "blah, whatever; it's not as good as the 90's".If you look into lists of "The Greatest Albums of All-Time", the last album to consistantly show up on people lists is "The Marshall Mathers LP"; a majority of people put that in their Top 10 & if it doesn't make the Top 10, it gets high recognition as a undeniable classic.So what happened after that release? Was there some private meeting among rap fans saying "Alright, no more classics"; because if you look at it, impact is IMPOSSIBLE to acheieve 2010, so basically there can never be another classic again lol.All you hear is "great album" or "oh, it's a personal classic, but I understand this isn't allowed to be in the discussion of 'greatest albums', I just like it a lot".I'm not denying that better albums came out in the 90's, I'm not saying Nas/Pac/Cube/Wu/etc. in their 90's prime isn't better than almost anyone from today; just I don't like how ANY album from today is automatically second to 90's albums, just because of "impact".Who should get more credit, the guy who invented the wheel, or a guy today who comes up with the latest brand of tires?On the subject of innovation, I think there are plenty of areas that haven't been explored within hip hop. I just think most emcees feel safer following the status quo. Also the Marshal Mathers LP isn't the last album to be considered classic. The College Dropout, Speakerboxx/The Love Below, Get Rich or Die Tryin, etc. The past few years? Sure. Hip Hop album sales have decreases drastically and sales are one of the signs of impact. Basically if the album doesn't make an impact, it can't really be a classic.
Quote from: rapsodie sees the groupie in you on August 23, 2010, 03:55:17 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on August 23, 2010, 02:08:55 PM^Today's artists are developing newer things; but the second they do, everybody runs, points fingers & says "That's so wack, Tupac is turning over in his grave".Let's face it, "hood life" or "thug life" or whatever you want to call it, isn't an unlimited, infinite topic; eventually, everything that needed to have been said, will have been said & then all you got is people repeating themselves.So basically, if you're a rapper today you're one of two things;1. Somebody trying to have a unique sound & it's "wack".2. Somebody trying to duplicate old records from the 90's & it's either "wack" or "blah, whatever; it's not as good as the 90's".If you look into lists of "The Greatest Albums of All-Time", the last album to consistantly show up on people lists is "The Marshall Mathers LP"; a majority of people put that in their Top 10 & if it doesn't make the Top 10, it gets high recognition as a undeniable classic.So what happened after that release? Was there some private meeting among rap fans saying "Alright, no more classics"; because if you look at it, impact is IMPOSSIBLE to acheieve 2010, so basically there can never be another classic again lol.All you hear is "great album" or "oh, it's a personal classic, but I understand this isn't allowed to be in the discussion of 'greatest albums', I just like it a lot".I'm not denying that better albums came out in the 90's, I'm not saying Nas/Pac/Cube/Wu/etc. in their 90's prime isn't better than almost anyone from today; just I don't like how ANY album from today is automatically second to 90's albums, just because of "impact".Who should get more credit, the guy who invented the wheel, or a guy today who comes up with the latest brand of tires?On the subject of innovation, I think there are plenty of areas that haven't been explored within hip hop. I just think most emcees feel safer following the status quo. Also the Marshal Mathers LP isn't the last album to be considered classic. The College Dropout, Speakerboxx/The Love Below, Get Rich or Die Tryin, etc. The past few years? Sure. Hip Hop album sales have decreases drastically and sales are one of the signs of impact. Basically if the album doesn't make an impact, it can't really be a classic.Credit is one thing, to say "this > that" because of impact is another.To use your analogy, today's wheel > caveman wheel; the cavemen will always get the credit, but today's wheel still rolls as well & better.The College Dropout & Get Rich or Die Tryin' are two classic albums, but I can't think of a time where somebodies list went:"1. Illmatic2. Doggystyle3. College Dropout4. 36 Chambers5. Get Rich or Die Tryin'"Maybe not in EVERYONE'S list because people dislike or "don't feel" Eminem's music, but a majority of the time MMLP gets credit for being one of the greatest.The two you named are amazing albums; including both of Kanye's other albums too, but they are just "modern day/personal/near classic" albums.