Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
NL mvp discussion
S P I C E:
Votto easily. Pujols shouldnt even be mentioned lol, you should not win the mvp on a team that misses the playoffs unless you do something spectacular like winning the triple crown or breaking a huge single season record (ex: Bonds in 2001). Pujols doesnt deserve the award at all this year, should definitely go to Votto without much debate.
OG Hack Wilson:
NL MVP UPDATE MOTHERFUCKERS
Player - Batting Avg/On Base / SLugging % / HR / RBI / OPS+
Joey Votto: 326 .426 .607 , 37 HR, 111 RBI, 175 OPS+
Albert Pujols: .313/.414/.602, 47 HR, 135 RBI, 172 OPS+
these are the only 2 legit candidates.....i say give it to Votto becuase Pujols has 3 MVPs already but to be honest it's almost a fucking tie
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: The Come Up Shuffle on September 27, 2010, 08:55:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hans Moleman on September 23, 2010, 06:24:21 PM ---glad to see nobody is buying into Carlos Gonzalez he's good but not as good as his stats indicate
--- End quote ---
His home and away splits are night and day.
--- End quote ---
you are correct sir
home: .386/.432/.755
away: .293/.327/.459
WHAT THE FUCK :o
white Boy:
--- Quote from: Hans Moleman on September 28, 2010, 02:30:35 PM ---NL MVP UPDATE MOTHERFUCKERS
Player - Batting Avg/On Base / SLugging % / HR / RBI / OPS+
Joey Votto: 326 .426 .607 , 37 HR, 111 RBI, 175 OPS+
Albert Pujols: .313/.414/.602, 47 HR, 135 RBI, 172 OPS+
these are the only 2 legit candidates.....i say give it to Votto becuase Pujols has 3 MVPs already but to be honest it's almost a fucking tie
--- End quote ---
pujols has 42 hrs
OG Hack Wilson:
i think i took some stats from 2009 by mistake
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version