It's May 14, 2024, 07:41:59 PM
This is a classic example of the many dudes on the net who have no feeling for what a good album is, and how it flows as a complete piece of work. So many people are writing "wack...filler...skipable...trash" bout tracks on artists albums. If you think an album is say 40% skipable then give up listening to the artist. Better yet, go back to the drawing board and re learn how to appreciate music.
Oh I'm sorry. Yeah you're right. Those tracks on The Chronic were wack
Hahah automatic thread fail for bringing up The Chronic and 2001. I was under the impression those albums were loved because of their consistency.
So what does a filler track mean to you?
Quote from: rapsodie sees the bitch in you on November 21, 2010, 08:54:26 AMHahah automatic thread fail for bringing up The Chronic and 2001. I was under the impression those albums were loved because of their consistency. Hahah automatic comment fail for not knowing that 2001 was criticized in many reviews for being overly long (Master P albums around that time started that trend of filling the entire CD with as many tracks as would fit) and so having a bunch of filler tracks
The chronic was a classic album and a wack album at the same time...i think this dudes take on it is rightsame for all the other songs he mentioned.........can't disagree wtih him on nothing.