Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Power Rankings week 13
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 30, 2010, 01:58:44 PM ---Brady > God.
--- End quote ---
Only if you're an atheist. Because that means God is nothing, and even Brady is greater than nothing. Not by much, but still greater. There might also be a pagan god or two Brady is greater than. Maybe Cupid, I don't know. Actually, no way, Cupid's hits some tough targets with his arrow. Brady needs wide open targets that still have to adjust for the ball. Oh, wait, I know; Cronus, the father of Zeus. To protect his place on top of the universe he ate his children at birth to prevent the prophecy of his son overthrowing him from coming true. Zeus was born in secret and he eventually killed his father and saved his siblings, thus creating the 12 Gods of Olympus. Brady just runs out on his kids, he doesn't try and eat them. So Brady>God (for atheists) and Brady>Father of ancient Greek Gods.
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Shallow on November 30, 2010, 02:21:04 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 30, 2010, 01:58:44 PM ---Brady > God.
--- End quote ---
Only if you're an atheist. Because that means God is nothing, and even Brady is greater than nothing. Not by much, but still greater. There might also be a pagan god or two Brady is greater than. Maybe Cupid, I don't know. Actually, no way, Cupid's hits some tough targets with his arrow. Brady needs wide open targets that still have to adjust for the ball. Oh, wait, I know; Cronus, the father of Zeus. To protect his place on top of the universe he ate his children at birth to prevent the prophecy of his son overthrowing him from coming true. Zeus was born in secret and he eventually killed his father and saved his siblings, thus creating the 12 Gods of Olympus. Brady just runs out on his kids, he doesn't try and eat them. So Brady>God (for atheists) and Brady>Father of ancient Greek Gods.
--- End quote ---
When Cupid can hit 50 targets in a season, call me.
Someone sounds very aggravated that Brady is doing wonderfully without Randy Moss & Peyton Manning just went back to back weeks throwing 3 picks. ;D
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 30, 2010, 03:36:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on November 30, 2010, 02:21:04 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 30, 2010, 01:58:44 PM ---Brady > God.
--- End quote ---
Only if you're an atheist. Because that means God is nothing, and even Brady is greater than nothing. Not by much, but still greater. There might also be a pagan god or two Brady is greater than. Maybe Cupid, I don't know. Actually, no way, Cupid's hits some tough targets with his arrow. Brady needs wide open targets that still have to adjust for the ball. Oh, wait, I know; Cronus, the father of Zeus. To protect his place on top of the universe he ate his children at birth to prevent the prophecy of his son overthrowing him from coming true. Zeus was born in secret and he eventually killed his father and saved his siblings, thus creating the 12 Gods of Olympus. Brady just runs out on his kids, he doesn't try and eat them. So Brady>God (for atheists) and Brady>Father of ancient Greek Gods.
--- End quote ---
When Cupid can hit 50 targets in a season, call me.
Someone sounds very aggravated that Brady is doing wonderfully without Randy Moss & Peyton Manning just went back to back weeks throwing 3 picks. ;D
--- End quote ---
I'm pretty sure more than 50 couples a year fall in love. Brady is doing on par with Kyle Orton and Matt Cassel, who both don't have Moss or a Moss type WR but both play in more or less the exact same offense Brady plays in.
I don't know how anyone here can still argue with me. I predicted 11-5 when Brady got hurt. I predicted Kyle Orton to have big numbers with or with out Marshall. I predicted Matt Cassel to stink it up last year, and then predicted him to come alive this year when Wies got involved. These are all things I said would happen before they did. I even predicted last Sunday's Colts loss and said they'd have no answer on the line against SD. So when I say the Pats would be just fine with out Brady and Brady will end up like Moss with out the Pats, I think I have some ground to stand on.
And if you think your Jets would have a better shot at winning with Brady instead of Manning, you're fooling yourself.
Chamillitary Click:
^Doesn't matter. Winning is winning, it doesn't matter if you do it by 42 or 14. Of course we'd have a "better" chance with Manning, but we'd still win the Super Bowl with Brady.
Nobody said Brady was better than Peyton. This is debate that Brady is better than more than "nothing".
& don't make me dig it up, but you clearly said the Pats wouldn't be as good without Moss. I clearly remember this when they waived him.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 30, 2010, 04:32:41 PM ---^Doesn't matter. Winning is winning, it doesn't matter if you do it by 42 or 14. Of course we'd have a "better" chance with Manning, but we'd still win the Super Bowl with Brady.
Nobody said Brady was better than Peyton. This is debate that Brady is better than more than "nothing".
& don't make me dig it up, but you clearly said the Pats wouldn't be as good without Moss. I clearly remember this when they waived him.
--- End quote ---
And they aren't as good with out Moss. I never said they were done with out him. Numbers are down, but the defense has gotten better. The offense is still chugging along, but no way are the "better" with Tate instead of Moss. Of course this was said before they signed Branch who has been a key in the offense. When Branch was signed I knew they'd dink and dunk just fine, but they aren't as good a team with out Moss. Except for the game in New York against the Jets they were averaging 40 point s game with Moss. The next 4 games after Moss left they averaged 20. The Steelers shot themselves in the foot by not running the ball and the other two games were against the two worst Ds in the league.
Winning is winning and with Tom Brady instead of Sanchez last year the Colts still would have beaten the Jets, because Peyton Manning was on the other side. If Peyton wasn't on the Colts and on the Jets then the Jets would be going for back to back rings this year.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version