Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Pats laying the smacketh down
OG Hack Wilson:
to sum it up in one sentence.....the jets offensive coorindator (Brian Schottenheimer) is a clown who cost the Jets the Ravens game and is a huge burden for todays game.
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 06, 2010, 08:38:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 06, 2010, 08:07:57 PM ---This O-Line is easily the best in the league though. Look at all that time to throw, vs. the Jets D of all D's :o
--- End quote ---
All this shit these idiot announcers keep saying about how young the team is Brady is playing with is forgetting to keep mentioning how great of a veteran o-line this is. The whole left side is and centre are hall of famers. Koppen, Mankins and Light, and Vollmer the new guy is looking like a stud.
Just switch the fucking o-lines with Manning and Brady. Just that. And Manning's going on more SBs than he already has MVPs and Brady is backing up Vick in Philly. Because, and I'll say it loud; BRADY COULDN'T WIN A STARTING JOB OVER MIKE VICK!!!!!!!!!!!
--- End quote ---
lol this is the same brady who threw 50 TD a few years ago i think he could win that job
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Carlton Banks on December 06, 2010, 09:22:36 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 06, 2010, 08:38:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 06, 2010, 08:07:57 PM ---This O-Line is easily the best in the league though. Look at all that time to throw, vs. the Jets D of all D's :o
--- End quote ---
All this shit these idiot announcers keep saying about how young the team is Brady is playing with is forgetting to keep mentioning how great of a veteran o-line this is. The whole left side is and centre are hall of famers. Koppen, Mankins and Light, and Vollmer the new guy is looking like a stud.
Just switch the fucking o-lines with Manning and Brady. Just that. And Manning's going on more SBs than he already has MVPs and Brady is backing up Vick in Philly. Because, and I'll say it loud; BRADY COULDN'T WIN A STARTING JOB OVER MIKE VICK!!!!!!!!!!!
--- End quote ---
lol this is the same brady who threw 50 TD a few years ago i think he could win that job
--- End quote ---
Michael Vick might not have thrown 50. He probably would run in 10 or 11, but he wins the SB that year. Because that same 50 TD Brady showed us what he is when his pocket isn't the size a small park.
white Boy:
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 06, 2010, 07:30:34 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 06, 2010, 07:16:51 PM ---Damn, embarrassing. What's wrong with the Jets tonight? Ryan fucked up with that challenge but this goes way beyond this. Brady looking great, not flustered by the Jets D at all. Sanchez looking really average and bothered.
What is the problem thus far?
--- End quote ---
He looked like shit once he was being knocked around a bit. No one gets flustered when you're o-line is running the show. They need to keep knocking him down and moving him off his mark. And that fag safety or whoever it was that's in for Leonard just need to turn around and that duck Brady throws on the first drive in an INT. That was a worse throw than any of the last 11 Manning picks but Tom Tiara gets a break with an idiot DB.
--- End quote ---
yea i was thinking that, before the game got ALL out of hand, that 1 brady pass, was easy TD, and he overthrew it, then on the pass interference play, WAAY underthrown, but the cb (or safety?) played that shit retarded and gave pats an easy flag, and the ball in scoring position.
i think anyone who dont have legs, is left for dead right now w/ eagles offensive line.
i felt like the pats winning, but in this fashion really suprised me, jets still got 2 hard games left in pitt and in chi, so the better get their shit together.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: white Boy on December 07, 2010, 05:56:31 AM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 06, 2010, 07:30:34 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 06, 2010, 07:16:51 PM ---Damn, embarrassing. What's wrong with the Jets tonight? Ryan fucked up with that challenge but this goes way beyond this. Brady looking great, not flustered by the Jets D at all. Sanchez looking really average and bothered.
What is the problem thus far?
--- End quote ---
He looked like shit once he was being knocked around a bit. No one gets flustered when you're o-line is running the show. They need to keep knocking him down and moving him off his mark. And that fag safety or whoever it was that's in for Leonard just need to turn around and that duck Brady throws on the first drive in an INT. That was a worse throw than any of the last 11 Manning picks but Tom Tiara gets a break with an idiot DB.
--- End quote ---
yea i was thinking that, before the game got ALL out of hand, that 1 brady pass, was easy TD, and he overthrew it, then on the pass interference play, WAAY underthrown, but the cb (or safety?) played that shit retarded and gave pats an easy flag, and the ball in scoring position.
i think anyone who dont have legs, is left for dead right now w/ eagles offensive line.
i felt like the pats winning, but in this fashion really suprised me, jets still got 2 hard games left in pitt and in chi, so the better get their shit together.
--- End quote ---
And just imagine Brady's whiny ass having to deal with guys like DeSean Jackson or McCoy after he yells at them for mistakes he made on the throw. Right now he has role players that will never cross the boss (Bellicheck). He played nice with Randy but he knew Randy was a bigger talent than he himself was. If he under throws a ball to Jackson after Jackson is open and then gets in Jackson's face he'd lose the team and Vick would get the next start.
Of course I still Peyton from the start would be better than Vick in Philly, but not by a lot. Brady would really hurt the Eagles this year. With Peyton I see them winning all 4 losses so far (but Vick would have won 2 of the Kolb games). With Brady I see them losing all 4 losses and then losing to NYG, Indy, and maybe Houston. So they'd already have 6 or 7 losses in my mind.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version