It's May 14, 2024, 07:38:10 PM
saddam wouldn't bomb france or any other european country, he shits a lot closer to his own doorstep.
No country should posses WMD. I feel what your saying though Infinite.. -{bLaDe}
From my knowledge there was an agreement not to build nuclear weapons in both iraq and n. korea.If there is an agreement the strength of future agreements of the sort rely on the fact that all agreements are upheld. If the UN allows n. korea to dismiss their previous agreement then what is the purpose of making any future agreements.Nuclear Weapons is not a game like, you did it so now i should get to do it. The US does a lot of shitty stuff, but fuck off seriously. We stand of for a lot of shit everyone else runs from. We never wanted to enter WWII, but we did and helped the WORLD win it. From then on we got the label "world police."So be it, the US does fucked up shit at time. For all you christains out there "let he who has not sinned cast the first stone." I'm sorry but all of you have sinned. Muslims have sinned repeatedly by their own standards in recent times. In being the so called "world police" we are expected to police the world for EVERYONE, and never ever consider our own self interest. We risk american lives all over the world at times for our own self interest and at times for the good of another portion of the world. World policing is not an easy thing to manage. And further more, why are we NOT allowed to care about the self interest of america? Is it our fault we achieved more than other countries? Are we supposed to self destruct ourselves so you feel better? Or since we are the most powerful economy and military should we just sacifice ourself for the sole good of those who hate us. Yeah good idea. Fuck off lets see you go sacrifice your country for the good of the countries that repeatedly shit talk you.This time its in the interest of the world not to allow n. korea and iraq to have nuclear weapons. Its also in the interest of the world to end terrorism. Basically, if we get blown up enjoy life void of all our economy and all the technological progress it produces. Do I completely like everything we do? No. But guess what I'm also not arrogant and ignorant enough to say I know how to better manage a whole country.
America is simply trying to keep peace in the world...We don't want N.Korea having WMD because they are sure to use it against S.Korea...and that would be bad.We don't want Sadaam to have WMD simply for the fact of "What would he do with it?". He would never nuclear bomb the US...but he woul bomb one of our European allies, like France.Plain and simple the US is trying to prevent a nuclear holocaust between countries from happening. We may seem like "bullies" to you, but its for EVERYONE's own damn good!PS: To Overseer's question...we still can't find that maufucka!
LMAO.... give me one fucking example
When did God give the white powers of this world (Europe, Russia, Isreal and America) exclusive rights to all the weapons of mass destruction? Why can't North Korea have nuclear weapons. In our UN agreement we agreed to supply them with fuel and we agreed not to use our nuclear power to threaten countries without nuclear warheads. We have gone back on both of those engagements. So why should North Korea keep up their end? Now we are going to try to starve their people out to get them to relinquish their nuclear sites.Remember what happened when we tried to starve Japan out? When we placed steal and oil embargo's on Japan they bombed Pearl Harbor. Predictably, the president pretended history began on that day in the same way that President Bush pretends that history began on Sept. 11th.My opinion is even if Iraq and North Korea have nuclear weapons it is not a valid justification for war. The only justification for war is oppression, continued oppression of one's people.
Quote from: Xear0 on January 07, 2003, 11:31:24 AMso you think that usa have the right to have nukes, biological, chemical, techical weapon, but not iraq and north korea??... lol... i dont even know what to saybecuase we can't trust them with weapons such as that, but like we can trust britain and our allies with that shit becuase either they'd sell the shit and it'd end up in the hands of some extremist who'd fuck shit up......most of our weapons just sit there and are a defense meconism incase someone nukes us, you nuke us you're already dead! so if you're an enemy of the allies and are planning to nuke us, your're already planning your own death, you be accomplishing nothing...makes scence to me
so you think that usa have the right to have nukes, biological, chemical, techical weapon, but not iraq and north korea??... lol... i dont even know what to say
No country should posses WMD. period
usa dont want n. korea to have nukes cuz they can tag with china and attack usausa dont want iraq to have nukes cuz they can threaten kuwait and other "chep oil countries" witch would increase the oil price in usa... that's why usa bombed iraq during gulf-war.. france got nukes o.. france can defend themself, if iraq could attack france, why aren't france doing anything to stop them. as matter fact, fance is one of the major countreis in europe thats against the war... and please explain for me why usa didnt attack france around 4-6 years ago, when france got their nukes?? they protested, but france basicly said "fuck off" and usa kept quiet... when when it comes to iraq, usa is gonna "bomb them muthafuckas"... lol.. looks like usa only attack those who cnt defend themself...so you think that usa have the right to have nukes, biological, chemical, techical weapon, but not iraq and north korea??... lol... i dont even know what to say