Author Topic: Snoop Dogg & David Guetta Sweat did 86,000 this week worldwide sales (Read 806 times)

PLANT · « **Reply #15 on:** April 09, 2011, 06:00:39 PM »

the remix is cool, better than the original imo

Okka · « **Reply #16 on:** April 10, 2011, 12:30:24 PM »

Quote from: PLANT on April 09, 2011, 06:00:39 PM

the remix is cool, better than the original imo

Si-Chiggedy · « **Reply #17 on:** April 10, 2011, 03:23:57 PM »

1. I think the remix is a good success but you gotta admit that David Guetta most probably got paid off very well for doing this remix, I also think it wouldn't even be blowing up without the "David Guetta Remix" stamp. This mix ain't as good as his other songs, I am very disappointed by this one.

2. As you may get from 1. I sometimes like house music when it's time to party and drink. I may not be an expert but this song is not what I like to hear. It's plain boring and somehow annoying with that penetrant synthesizer. But more important: The regular version of "Wet" was a club record anyway, why would you do a fucking club version to a club track? Did the regular version of "Wet" even got play on the radio or in the clubs? Does anyone know? I like the regular version, THAT's what I call a decent club record.

3. I liked the Wide Boys Club Mix of "Sensual Seduction" way better than this. It actually got some freaky elements and a nice bass to vibe to.

SOUL MECHANIX · « **Reply #18 on:** April 11, 2011, 01:42:29 AM »

Thanks for the update!!

ironmike · « **Reply #19 on:** April 11, 2011, 02:42:39 AM »

the original version of wet sounds wack as fuck.
The remix is a hundred times better. I dont consider the remix as a proper hiphop track, but just as a house track, and its good for what it is. It wouldnt suit to go on the album, but good as a house single for radio play, and the clubs