It's May 13, 2024, 01:20:13 AM
Quote from: Jrome The Don Killuminati on June 13, 2011, 08:15:46 PMQuote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 06:04:03 PMSome people obviously don't understand what "Huge" means.Obviously Napster wasn't huge back then, as showcased by the title of this thread. If Napster was huge then the eastsidaz debut album would never have gone platinum.Itunes is huge. Napster was not huge. You can call it revolutionary, but certainly not huge. Yes, it certainly was a game changer for music, but compared to music downloading today, it wasn't used nearly as much as music gets downloaded these days.From kids who can't even hardly read all the way up to senior citizens who can barely understand the lyrics to music, Itunes is easily accessible and used. Napster was primarily only used by college students.Napster wasn't huge? lol ok.don't listen to that fat fucker
Quote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 06:04:03 PMSome people obviously don't understand what "Huge" means.Obviously Napster wasn't huge back then, as showcased by the title of this thread. If Napster was huge then the eastsidaz debut album would never have gone platinum.Itunes is huge. Napster was not huge. You can call it revolutionary, but certainly not huge. Yes, it certainly was a game changer for music, but compared to music downloading today, it wasn't used nearly as much as music gets downloaded these days.From kids who can't even hardly read all the way up to senior citizens who can barely understand the lyrics to music, Itunes is easily accessible and used. Napster was primarily only used by college students.Napster wasn't huge? lol ok.
Some people obviously don't understand what "Huge" means.Obviously Napster wasn't huge back then, as showcased by the title of this thread. If Napster was huge then the eastsidaz debut album would never have gone platinum.Itunes is huge. Napster was not huge. You can call it revolutionary, but certainly not huge. Yes, it certainly was a game changer for music, but compared to music downloading today, it wasn't used nearly as much as music gets downloaded these days.From kids who can't even hardly read all the way up to senior citizens who can barely understand the lyrics to music, Itunes is easily accessible and used. Napster was primarily only used by college students.
Quote from: The Grandyman Can on June 13, 2011, 08:20:16 PMQuote from: Jrome The Don Killuminati on June 13, 2011, 08:15:46 PMQuote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 06:04:03 PMSome people obviously don't understand what "Huge" means.Obviously Napster wasn't huge back then, as showcased by the title of this thread. If Napster was huge then the eastsidaz debut album would never have gone platinum.Itunes is huge. Napster was not huge. You can call it revolutionary, but certainly not huge. Yes, it certainly was a game changer for music, but compared to music downloading today, it wasn't used nearly as much as music gets downloaded these days.From kids who can't even hardly read all the way up to senior citizens who can barely understand the lyrics to music, Itunes is easily accessible and used. Napster was primarily only used by college students.Napster wasn't huge? lol ok.don't listen to that fat fuckerthis thread has nothing to do with crooked I, what are you doing in here?
Quote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 08:22:45 PMQuote from: The Grandyman Can on June 13, 2011, 08:20:16 PMQuote from: Jrome The Don Killuminati on June 13, 2011, 08:15:46 PMQuote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 06:04:03 PMSome people obviously don't understand what "Huge" means.Obviously Napster wasn't huge back then, as showcased by the title of this thread. If Napster was huge then the eastsidaz debut album would never have gone platinum.Itunes is huge. Napster was not huge. You can call it revolutionary, but certainly not huge. Yes, it certainly was a game changer for music, but compared to music downloading today, it wasn't used nearly as much as music gets downloaded these days.From kids who can't even hardly read all the way up to senior citizens who can barely understand the lyrics to music, Itunes is easily accessible and used. Napster was primarily only used by college students.Napster wasn't huge? lol ok.don't listen to that fat fuckerthis thread has nothing to do with crooked I, what are you doing in here?good comeback fatboygo show us those dimes you claim to bang
Quote from: Jrome The Don Killuminati on June 13, 2011, 08:15:46 PMNapster wasn't huge? lol ok.No it wasn't, as I said, if it were huge then tha eastsidaz would have never gone platinum.
Napster wasn't huge? lol ok.
You euro crakkkas need to shut your asses up about Napster being hugewas it huge? YESin what way? Millions of people were using it to DL musicJust like today? NO, because most people were on dial up still and songs had to be downloaded individually people still copped albums because it was a pain in the ass to DL full albums for most peopleNOW SHUT THE FUCK UP
Quote from: Detox Iz Not Active on June 14, 2011, 07:30:58 PMYou euro crakkkas need to shut your asses up about Napster being hugewas it huge? YESin what way? Millions of people were using it to DL musicJust like today? NO, because most people were on dial up still and songs had to be downloaded individually people still copped albums because it was a pain in the ass to DL full albums for most peopleNOW SHUT THE FUCK UP"NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP"--------------------------------LMAO - emotions is a hard thing to cope wit cuzzu threw ur keyboard on the floor, right?
Quote from: Jrome The Don Killuminati on June 13, 2011, 08:15:46 PMQuote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 06:04:03 PMSome people obviously don't understand what "Huge" means.Obviously Napster wasn't huge back then, as showcased by the title of this thread. If Napster was huge then the eastsidaz debut album would never have gone platinum.Itunes is huge. Napster was not huge. You can call it revolutionary, but certainly not huge. Yes, it certainly was a game changer for music, but compared to music downloading today, it wasn't used nearly as much as music gets downloaded these days.From kids who can't even hardly read all the way up to senior citizens who can barely understand the lyrics to music, Itunes is easily accessible and used. Napster was primarily only used by college students.Napster wasn't huge? lol ok.No it wasn't, as I said, if it were huge then tha eastsidaz would have never gone platinum.
Quote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 08:21:53 PMQuote from: Jrome The Don Killuminati on June 13, 2011, 08:15:46 PMQuote from: Acgrundy on June 13, 2011, 06:04:03 PMSome people obviously don't understand what "Huge" means.Obviously Napster wasn't huge back then, as showcased by the title of this thread. If Napster was huge then the eastsidaz debut album would never have gone platinum.Itunes is huge. Napster was not huge. You can call it revolutionary, but certainly not huge. Yes, it certainly was a game changer for music, but compared to music downloading today, it wasn't used nearly as much as music gets downloaded these days.From kids who can't even hardly read all the way up to senior citizens who can barely understand the lyrics to music, Itunes is easily accessible and used. Napster was primarily only used by college students.Napster wasn't huge? lol ok.No it wasn't, as I said, if it were huge then tha eastsidaz would have never gone platinum.Artists are still going platinum, so that argument means nothing. It was huge, Napster was easily one of the biggest stories when it came on the scene.