It's May 04, 2024, 02:23:02 AM
...wasn't talking about that year...I was bringing up another "interesting stat in the Kobe vs Jordan debate" LOL.I love how you have to fall back on this conspiracy over you to defend what you say. You're lost, son lol.& like I said, it doesn't matter what the league scoring was...just the Bulls & the Lakers scoring. & you took two random years...as did I. You just look silly now.
Pau is a more efficient scorer than Kobe, he doesn't take as many stupid shots.
Quote from: Citizen-Y on July 01, 2011, 03:25:12 PMPau is a more efficient scorer than Kobe, he doesn't take as many stupid shots.also more efficient than hakeem
Quote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 01, 2011, 01:46:55 PM...wasn't talking about that year...I was bringing up another "interesting stat in the Kobe vs Jordan debate" LOL.I love how you have to fall back on this conspiracy over you to defend what you say. You're lost, son lol.& like I said, it doesn't matter what the league scoring was...just the Bulls & the Lakers scoring. & you took two random years...as did I. You just look silly now.i t i s n o t a c o n s p i r a c y, i d i o t........i t s a s t a t i s t i c. k i l l u r s e l f.
Quote from: NIKCC on July 01, 2011, 03:28:11 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on July 01, 2011, 03:25:12 PMPau is a more efficient scorer than Kobe, he doesn't take as many stupid shots.also more efficient than hakeem And still better than Kobe
Quote from: NIKCC on July 01, 2011, 02:49:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 01, 2011, 01:46:55 PM...wasn't talking about that year...I was bringing up another "interesting stat in the Kobe vs Jordan debate" LOL.I love how you have to fall back on this conspiracy over you to defend what you say. You're lost, son lol.& like I said, it doesn't matter what the league scoring was...just the Bulls & the Lakers scoring. & you took two random years...as did I. You just look silly now.i t i s n o t a c o n s p i r a c y, i d i o t........i t s a s t a t i s t i c. k i l l u r s e l f. ...I was referring to you saying "so many people ride my dick & you do too". Just your generic comeback when you've clearly lost. Embarrassing.
LOL, alright NIK, what does the stat prove then? "that IF Kobe played back then, he WOULD have score 40 PPG". If that's not your point, the stat is irrelevant, otherwise tell me what it proves....& if what I quoted is your point, then you're an idiot for assuming Kobe would have done something & that "proves" anything Kobe has over Jordan.Finally, like I said, your stat is flawed because taking the league average doesn't do anything, you have to take the average that the Lakers & Bulls scored per game because they both had 48 minutes to score as many points as they can. You're an idiot.So yeah...embarrassing. You're entire thread is beyond pointless lol.
a SPECULATION is NOT A STAT therefor your "Kobe vs. Jordan" debate in no longer relevant - face it and move forward dude.Kobe is a great player, def still the best in this era but he will always be "The SECOND greatest shooting guard in NBA history" next to Michael Air Jeffrey Jordan. He is NOT Michael. He's got many similar things in his character but that's it. Both are/were great players but MJ will forever remain "THE BEST THIS GAME EVER HAD".As good as Kobe is, he will always be SECOND BEST, next to His Airness.
You sound upset that I proved this to be pointless.You just said, "this thread doesn't have to prove anything". Don't act like you just wanted to "educate" us all like, "Crazy...the scoring difference between this year & this year is a wide margin...Outrageous...". No, you made this thread to act like it meant something for Kobe in the "Kobe vs Jordan debate", hence the title.Now I got you scrambling saying you posted it "just because". I win. You lose. Get used to it.
LOL, moron! It's fucking simple. "Interesting stat in the Kobe vs Jordan debate........", how is it interesting? What purpose does it serve? Are you really saying you didn't post it for Kobe?God, you're retarded.