Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Interesting stat in Kobe vs Jordan debate......
Chamillitary Click:
Quote me where I dispute the math involved...lmao.
All I'm saying is that the fact doesn't mean ANYTHING towards the argument.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 02, 2011, 07:31:59 PM ---Quote me where I dispute the math involved...lmao.
All I'm saying is that the fact doesn't mean ANYTHING towards the argument.
--- End quote ---
it means this...kobe played in a generation where defenses allowed less points. take that how ever u want, nancy boy, just try not gettin as emotional next time around.
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on July 02, 2011, 08:13:00 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 02, 2011, 07:31:59 PM ---Quote me where I dispute the math involved...lmao.
All I'm saying is that the fact doesn't mean ANYTHING towards the argument.
--- End quote ---
it means this...kobe played in a generation where defenses allowed less points. take that how ever u want, nancy boy, just try not gettin as emotional next time around.
--- End quote ---
LOL, alright. So how is it interesting? How does it factor into the Kobe/MJ debate at all if now you're saying, "it doesn't mean anything for either side, it's just a stat I wanted to share"? C'mon, kid.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 02, 2011, 08:21:06 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on July 02, 2011, 08:13:00 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 02, 2011, 07:31:59 PM ---Quote me where I dispute the math involved...lmao.
All I'm saying is that the fact doesn't mean ANYTHING towards the argument.
--- End quote ---
it means this...kobe played in a generation where defenses allowed less points. take that how ever u want, nancy boy, just try not gettin as emotional next time around.
--- End quote ---
LOL, alright. So how is it interesting? How does it factor into the Kobe/MJ debate at all if now you're saying, "it doesn't mean anything for either side, it's just a stat I wanted to share"? C'mon, kid.
--- End quote ---
no way u can be this retarded.
Mietek23:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on July 02, 2011, 12:46:12 PM ---
--- Quote from: Mietek23 on July 02, 2011, 05:03:36 AM ---a SPECULATION is NOT A STAT therefor your "Kobe vs. Jordan" debate in no longer relevant - face it and move forward dude.
Kobe is a great player, def still the best in this era but he will always be "The SECOND greatest shooting guard in NBA history" next to Michael Air Jeffrey Jordan. He is NOT Michael. He's got many similar things in his character but that's it. Both are/were great players but MJ will forever remain "THE BEST THIS GAME EVER HAD".
As good as Kobe is, he will always be SECOND BEST, next to His Airness.
--- End quote ---
thats ur opinion...as far as speculation, nothing was speculated in here. i brought up a stat in terms of ratio. in terms of ration, 35.4/97=40.1/110. only an idiot like cham could argue that lol.
--- End quote ---
It is the same speculation like the one Phil said that if Michael had played in this era with NO DEFENSE and plenty of PUSSY CALLS, he would average 45 points per game. It's the same speculation that Michael could score 100 points in today's NBA game - maybe he could or maybe he couldn't.
The fact is - we will never know.
Same goes for your so called "stat" - we will never know if Kobe could score 40 points durning the 80's. It was a different ball game under a different rules so we can only speculate..
So please, move forward and stop this so-called "MJ-KB debate" cause it's really pointless at this period of time.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version