Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Interesting stat in Kobe vs Jordan debate......
Sccit:
--- Quote from: westside4life on June 27, 2011, 10:28:04 AM ---damn nikcc you in love with kobe or something?? you an embarrassment to laker fans, let kobe do kobe and let him win his own rings without being compared to MJ, MJ is MJ, Kobe is Kobe and you sound like a teenie bopper
--- End quote ---
LOL, i have a new fan
teecee:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on June 26, 2011, 11:51:50 PM ---Some of you may already know this, but i never gave much thought to this before today...when comparing Kobe's and Jordan's scoring accomplishments, i noticed how much higher the amount of scoring was in the league back when Jordan played.
Just to take the two players highest scoring years as an example, MJ scored 37.1 ppg in 1986-1987, when teams were averaging 109.9 ppg. In contrast, Kobe scored 35.4 ppg in 2005-2006, when teams were averaging 97.1 ppg.
Or, to put it another way:
MJ: 37.1/109.9 = 0.337579618
Kobe: 35.4/97.1 = 0.364572606
Kobe's "ratio," based on 109.9 points per game, would have equaled 40.1 ppg.
When seen in the context of his era, Kobe's peak scoring is even more impressive.
--- End quote ---
Imagine what Kobe could average if he was as efficient offensively as MJ
Citizen-Y:
.539 > .469
OG Jaydc:
LOL thier is NO Kobe vs Jordan debate except in your mind.I don't think I've seen anyone but a laker groupie even think thier is a debate
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Jaydc is back on June 27, 2011, 04:52:37 PM ---LOL thier is NO Kobe vs Jordan debate except in your mind.I don't think I've seen anyone but a laker groupie even think thier is a debate
--- End quote ---
That's what I'm saying. This guy says I'm bitter...you just sat there & came up with some crazy statistic to attempt to prove a point that is just irrelevant.
My favorite part of your posts is how you demand people to agree with you or else they're "nutriding". It's simply amazing how defensive you get when people shut you up.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version