Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Nightmare on Elm St. 2 (2012)

(1/4) > >>

V2DHeart:
After the 2010 Nightmare On Elm Street Remake ended the 2012 picks up 5 months after the ending. And follows the characters lives as in college everyone tries to move on

It will be in 3D, but no official word on anything else

They ruined the original IMO. They took a brutal child 'killer', and tranformed him into a "questionable" child abuser. They took the fear, and chilling factor from the Freddy character, also, Robert Englund was irreplaceable, unlike a Jason, or Michael Myers horror character with a "guy in a mask".

Ther remake started off well - Springwood diner, had that vintage feel to it, but after ten minutes, it was just another typical modern day horror

13th Duke:
Does ANYONE really need this in their lives?

I agree about them ruining the first one also. They tried to somehow make us feel sympathy for Krueger, which surely goes against everything they did in the originals...and it didn't work.

Native American:
yeah, they really fucked this one up, and now they want to do it in 3D....LMAO 3D is just stupid...unless its animation, like Beowolf was.

I decided to watch Halloween 1,2 (Rob Zombie) and the shit was sickness besides the beginning of 1 with the bad acting of the kid and the mother.... get passed that and the movie "sound and action wise" was amazing. I originally disliked them but after watching the Original Halloween 1,2 I thought to myself how can you beef this shit up and Rob did it justice. He said he doesnt want to redue 3......but if youve seen 3 then u would agree. lol

DJ SUGAFREE QUIK:

--- Quote from: Native American on October 27, 2011, 07:32:03 PM ---yeah, they really fucked this one up, and now they want to do it in 3D....LMAO 3D is just stupid...unless its animation, like Beowolf was.

I decided to watch Halloween 1,2 (Rob Zombie) and the shit was sickness besides the beginning of 1 with the bad acting of the kid and the mother.... get passed that and the movie "sound and action wise" was amazing. I originally disliked them but after watching the Original Halloween 1,2 I thought to myself how can you beef this shit up and Rob did it justice. He said he doesnt want to redue 3......but if youve seen 3 then u would agree. lol

--- End quote ---
I normally don't talk like this but halloween 3 SUCKED A$$!  And darn it >:( that stupid silver shamrock song in that movie is partially in my head.

And I seen the original NOES 2[3 & 4 also] that one sucked also.  Wish that madness of the constant remakes would stop.  Hey how about a sequel to Bones, Dr. Giggles[didn't see] or even Hellraiser[pinhead] instead?

JohnnyL:
  Jackie Earle Haley is a good actor, but there was no point in re-casting Freddy Krueger  when Robert Englund is still around and could have easily returned for the role.  It was like they felt the need to recast it, just because they were doing the remake.
  As far as the story, I didn't find too much fault with it.  The micro-sleep idea was an interesting element to introduce.  But really, what's the point in remaking all of these classics.  This movie, in no way, improved on the original. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page