Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
MW3
Chamillitary Click:
^That's actually pretty hilarious. But who cares? It's a new game, new story & only $60. Unless you're a broke motherfucker it's a must have.
Javier:
Hardly anybody plays this game for the storyline, it's all about multiplayer. They haven't updated their game engine since MW 1, and the only thing new about it are the maps and some weapons. Turns out not they're even recycling buildings? Straight laziness from the developers, and Activision knows people will just pay for the game, pay for ELITE, and pay for extra $$$ for old maps and 1 or 2 new ones lol. That's why half the people from Infinity Ward originally left during and after MW 2 was being developed, they wanted to update the game engine and come up with a new bad ass game. Activision said no cuz of course they rather just release the new game, keep cost low, and make a ton of money from people that are willing to pay for the same game. There are so many better games out there that have come out this year that are worth getting than MW3.
Makaveli's Food & Liquor:
^ While i completely agree with you, what exactly are people expecting them to change? Consoles are so limited in what they can do nowadays compared to PC, Battlefield 3 is a great example of that, on PC it looks amazing, runs at 60 fps but there's noway they could even get it running close to that on consoles and that's why once again consoles get stuck with 30 fps and graphics which weren't really much of an upgrade atall from BF: Bad Company 2. Shit if you're on Xbox and you don't install that HD texture pack some of the graphics are awful, comparable to the PS2 days. COD's easily got the best gameplay of any shooter because of the fact that it manages to run at nearly 60 fps if that means the graphics won't be comparable to other top games that's fine to me cos gameplay's the only thing that's important
Javier:
--- Quote from: Makaveli's Food & Liquor on November 08, 2011, 03:28:27 PM ---^ While i completely agree with you, what exactly are people expecting them to change? Consoles are so limited in what they can do nowadays compared to PC, Battlefield 3 is a great example of that, on PC it looks amazing, runs at 60 fps but there's noway they could even get it running close to that on consoles and that's why once again consoles get stuck with 30 fps and graphics which weren't really much of an upgrade atall from BF: Bad Company 2. Shit if you're on Xbox and you don't install that HD texture pack some of the graphics are awful, comparable to the PS2 days. COD's easily got the best gameplay of any shooter because of the fact that it manages to run at nearly 60 fps if that means the graphics won't be comparable to other top games that's fine to me cos gameplay's the only thing that's important
--- End quote ---
A lot can change. Uncharted 1 to Uncharted 3 showed vast improvements. Oblivion to Fallout 3 to Skyrim again is showing a ton of improvements. I would have loved to see what the creative minds of Infinity Ward could have done if they had more freedom during 2.
7even:
I just ordered a PS3 because I got tired of my supposed high-end PC breaking for literally the 5th time in 3 years. No the graphic card got smoked and I paid 60 bucks just to let some nerds check what's wrong cause the warranty has expired. I'm so beyond pissed that I'm done with high-end gaming PCs for a while. I ordered the PS3 really fast without thinking much cause I've been waiting for Skyrim since forever and I really NEED this game on release date.
So, my question now is, is MW3 the game to get when you don't want to buy dozens of FPS and just bought a PS3? Or are there better games? Like, for a high-end PC, Battlefield 3 is probably better than MW3. But for a PS3, I'd rather get MW3 I suppose..
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version