Lifestyle > Train of Thought

UK to start WAR with Iran (possible attack)

(1/4) > >>

V2DHeart:
Britain's armed forces are stepping up their contingency planning for potential military action against Iran amid mounting concern about Tehran's nuclear enrichment programme, the Guardian has learned.

In anticipation of a potential attack, British military planners are examining where best to deploy Royal Navy ships and submarines equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles over the coming months as part of what would be an air and sea campaign.

They also believe the US would ask permission to launch attacks from Diego Garcia, the British Indian ocean territory, which the Americans have used previously for conflicts in the Middle East.

Source: UK Newspapers, and Sky News TV

 ::) ::)

I guess they'll start making up excuses to attack as soon as they move out of Afghanistan now that they have a central bank and puppet government installed there, and the fact that there's no need for a UK fleet in Libya anymore.

I don't know what gives the UK the right to think they can just go around "invading" countries whenever they feel like it, and you know US will be right behind them too... Iran, Pakistan, and Syria will be targeted within the next 10 years to gain control of the entire middle east

David Mack:
The plan is to "sucker" China and Russia into a military conflict. Basically the Anglo-American establishment has been busy trying to initiate this conflict with the actions they have taken in the last few years. A couple points I could think of........................

1.Funding so called Rebels and bombing Libya to overthrow a government who did big business with China. Libya was a major supplier of oil to the Chinese and with the CIA funded rebels in charge, the oil deal will go out the window.

2.Russia has a deal with Syria to operate the port of Tartus just off the coast of the middle eastern country. Its a huge strategic military port for the Russians and with the current West sponsored uprising, there is fears that Syria will face the same fate as Libya.
Which is the overthrow of the government and the Russians being revoked the rights to Tartus. The Russians are sending a fleet of subs to Tartus as we speak.

3.The constant drone attacks and murders by the US army in Pakistan which China has condemned many times and has threatened to intervene if necessary as Pakistan is a key ally with China.

4. And finally the grand daddy of em all....................IRAN. Now Iran isn't some cake walk like Afghanistan was. It is a country with a huge population, solid military capability and Chinese/Russian backing.  Some people say the US/ISRAEL/UK are pre-emptively attacking IRAN for resourse control (oil mainly) or for the interests of Israel. That is all true but I think if the attack on IRAN does happen, it may lead to something much more sinister. We are now seeing the west impose sanctions on IRAN and the frustration of the Chinese rising. So much so that China's Major General Zhang said that China will not hesitate to protect IRAN from military intervention even if it means World War 3.




Will this all happen? Who the fuck knows but it will be catasrophic it if does. We are dealing with Nuclear power houses that could wipe out millions if not billions of people. Maybe it is the final stages of bringing a more centralized society controlled by a one world government where the world is substantially depopulated.

7even:
From what you guys are typing one could think that countries like Libya, Syria, Iran or China are a cornerstone for human rights, freedom and innovative development, and don't do or think of anything bad ever. When in reality those governments and institutions in power over there aren't saints either and it's not as if guys like Gaddafi or Ahmedinejad never asked for trouble. It's not like the western world is pure evil bringing doom over the entire globe attacking purely innocent countries or anything. Imagine a world in which countries like Iran, Syria and China had the upper hand globally... wouldn't be better at all. I mean get real, guys. Those anti-western, nwo-fearing, middle east-glorifying attitudes seem so juvenile when you go too far overboard with them.

virtuoso:
 
There is good and bad in every nation and in some respects the likes of Syria, Libya were more free, certainly in the case of Libya received more help and were more affluent than us. No nation is wholly evil it's parasitic elements within that tare but the point is the invasion and destruction of nations is evil, worse still when said nation cannot defend itself. I do though disagree regarding suckering in China because since Libya was an important asset to China, then if they had wished to they could have vetoed at the UN but instead they didn't. This tells me that a back room deal was worked out in which China agreed to the overthrow of the political regime operating in Libya.

V2DHeart:
I'm not saying that middle eastern countries leadership are any better or worse than ours, but one thing's for sure, their society is far better, more civilized, friendlier, and safer than in the UK or US (Iran we're talking about) they don't have the social problems, the drug issues, and lack of respect in the youth over there, so they must be doing something right... Anyone remember Iraq before and after the invasion? Before the invasion, illegal drug use was very rare, and after the US & UK invasion it was pretty much everywhere. Anyone ever been to Iran or Libya before?
 
UK & US can't go around policing the world, and bullying people into sanctions "they" create from thin air. If I were Iran, I too would be racing to make a nuclear deterrent, after seeing Iraq, Afghanistan & Libya bullied into giving up their countries. The West may get oil from it, but they're pushing those countries into a degree of unresolvable scarring, and control of banks with no other motive than to have an evil grip on them forever. Anyone who's tried to escape it's grip and come together, to create laws, or even pay back these people are assassinated (see: Lincoln, and JFK)
 
Iran is bigger than the UK, but like Russia, most of their country is unoccupied by anyone. I think Iran has a population of around 72 mil, while UK has around 66 mil. Not much of a difference, and when you put the military spending power in place, UK being 3rd or 4th in the world, it's not a fair fight, especially when they bring along the rest of it's buddies (US, & France) along to the party as well

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page