Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
NFL week 13 (Official Discussion)
Lunatic:
--- Quote from: Jaydc is back on December 05, 2011, 12:42:57 PM ---I say you finish 9-7, one off from what I predicted.But who knows, the next four weeks are going to be crazy.
--- End quote ---
You'll need us to lose to both hou & nwo in that case. Considering hou is week 17 and they'll have the division wrapped up by then, they'll likely be resting,
or hope we drop one to indy or jax lol
not saying it's impossible we go 9-7, but I like our chances of 10-6
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 05, 2011, 09:49:14 AM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 05, 2011, 05:45:18 AM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 04, 2011, 08:43:21 PM ---
--- Quote from: Jaydc is back on December 04, 2011, 01:50:49 PM ---Also,it's odd that the last three titans all ended in 23-17 scores
--- End quote ---
Duely noted.. I know TB & Buf did, forgot about ATL..
Titans baby 8) 8) 8) I was at this game live and had a great fucking time cheering on my boys!
7-5!! When most analysts predicted a 3-5 win season..
--- End quote ---
Most of those predictions, mine included, came in before Hasselbeck was signed and before Peyton was sidelined. That those two things away and you'd be lucky to have 3 wins right now.
My Bills collapsed once they lost their centers. It's not that Kyle Williams is that good, though he is good. It's that they have no replacement NT and moving the rookie Dareus over just hurts the run D even more.
--- End quote ---
LMAO that makes no sense. So if Peyton wasn't sidelined, we'd be a 3 win team? We've played the Colts once...I'd love to know how you figure that?
And the Hasselbeck signing comment is even more dumb. "The Packers wouldn't be so good if they didn't draft Rodgers a few years ago." You see what I did there? Stupid..
We signed a QB... ???
And no, most of the predictions I saw came after we signed Hasselbeck.
--- End quote ---
All I can speak for is my prediction; and it came before Hasselbeck was signed. Peyton playing this year gives you two losses guaranteed, one already, and one on the way. Locker or whoever they would have started would have given you losses against Baltimore, Denver, TB in my opinion. That's 3 less, 4 less with Peyton against Indy, giving you a current 3-9 record, 4 and 8 maybe. And with the Saints, Colts and Texans coming up that'd been 3 more losses, which will now be 2 more losses because of no Peyton, and I still don't expect you to do much against Wade's defense in Houston come Jan 1st.
And once Matt was in there and then Peyton was a no show I agreed that you guys would be at least be in the WC hunt all season, and you can check my posts. But early in the off season I had you guys fighting for last in the division. It's not that you simply signed a QB, or even a vet. It's that you signed someone I believed in that made me more hopeful. Had it been Delhomme or McNabb I wouldn't have been so uppy on your Titans, and once Peyton went down I called for no wins by the Colts until he comes back.
Lunatic:
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 05, 2011, 01:50:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 05, 2011, 09:49:14 AM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 05, 2011, 05:45:18 AM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 04, 2011, 08:43:21 PM ---
--- Quote from: Jaydc is back on December 04, 2011, 01:50:49 PM ---Also,it's odd that the last three titans all ended in 23-17 scores
--- End quote ---
Duely noted.. I know TB & Buf did, forgot about ATL..
Titans baby 8) 8) 8) I was at this game live and had a great fucking time cheering on my boys!
7-5!! When most analysts predicted a 3-5 win season..
--- End quote ---
Most of those predictions, mine included, came in before Hasselbeck was signed and before Peyton was sidelined. That those two things away and you'd be lucky to have 3 wins right now.
My Bills collapsed once they lost their centers. It's not that Kyle Williams is that good, though he is good. It's that they have no replacement NT and moving the rookie Dareus over just hurts the run D even more.
--- End quote ---
LMAO that makes no sense. So if Peyton wasn't sidelined, we'd be a 3 win team? We've played the Colts once...I'd love to know how you figure that?
And the Hasselbeck signing comment is even more dumb. "The Packers wouldn't be so good if they didn't draft Rodgers a few years ago." You see what I did there? Stupid..
We signed a QB... ???
And no, most of the predictions I saw came after we signed Hasselbeck.
--- End quote ---
All I can speak for is my prediction; and it came before Hasselbeck was signed. Peyton playing this year gives you two losses guaranteed, one already, and one on the way. Locker or whoever they would have started would have given you losses against Baltimore, Denver, TB in my opinion. That's 3 less, 4 less with Peyton against Indy, giving you a current 3-9 record, 4 and 8 maybe. And with the Saints, Colts and Texans coming up that'd been 3 more losses, which will now be 2 more losses because of no Peyton, and I still don't expect you to do much against Wade's defense in Houston come Jan 1st.
And once Matt was in there and then Peyton was a no show I agreed that you guys would be at least be in the WC hunt all season, and you can check my posts. But early in the off season I had you guys fighting for last in the division. It's not that you simply signed a QB, or even a vet. It's that you signed someone I believed in that made me more hopeful. Had it been Delhomme or McNabb I wouldn't have been so uppy on your Titans, and once Peyton went down I called for no wins by the Colts until he comes back.
--- End quote ---
I'll disregard the Locker thing because it doesn't matter, Hasselbeck is our QB. I could care less about any of the talk before he was signed and wasn't accusing you of anything. I know plenty analysts still had us as a 3-5 win team with Hasselbeck, that was my original point.
Sure Manning MAY give us two losses (I think we'd split with the Colts like we have multiple times in previous years WITH Manning) but we're still not a 3-5 win team.
We're still a 8-9 win team with a healthy Manning in the division.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 05, 2011, 03:23:01 PM ---
We're still a 8-9 win team with a healthy Manning in the division.
--- End quote ---
Who cares? All that means is worse draft picks.
And if the Colts can't land Cowher, I hope they get Fisher. You put Fisher wit Manning on the Titans and they'd still be winning Superbowls.
Lunatic:
--- Quote from: Shallow on December 05, 2011, 03:28:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lunatic on December 05, 2011, 03:23:01 PM ---
We're still a 8-9 win team with a healthy Manning in the division.
--- End quote ---
Who cares? All that means is worse draft picks.
And if the Colts can't land Cowher, I hope they get Fisher. You put Fisher wit Manning on the Titans and they'd still be winning Superbowls.
--- End quote ---
We're gonna get to 10 anyways
Fisher is immensely overrated. He'll run the ball and use Manning and the passing offense as a decoy lol.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version