Author Topic: USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles  (Read 478 times)

bouli77

USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles
« on: August 24, 2012, 10:48:31 AM »
source : http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-400_162-57499550/armstrong-wont-fight-usada-charges/

Quote
Updated 6:15 a./m. ET

(CBS/AP) The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency said Thursday night it will strip Lance Armstrong of his unprecedented seven Tour de France titles after he declared he was finished fighting the drug charges that threaten his legacy as one of the greatest cyclists of all time.

Travis Tygart, USADA's chief executive, said Armstrong would also be hit with a lifetime ban on Friday.

Armstrong dropped any further challenges Thursday night to USADA's allegations that he took performance-enhancing drugs to win cycling's premier event from 1999-2005.

Armstrong says USADA doesn't have the authority to vacate his Tour titles. However, Tygart told The Associated Press that USADA can do it.

Tygart called the Armstrong case a "heartbreaking" example of a win-at-all costs approach to sports.

On Friday, World Anti-Doping Agency head John Fahey told Reuters Armstrong should be stripped of his seven Tour titles, because his decision not to fight doping charges meant there was "substance" to the allegations.

Still to be heard from was the sport's governing body, the International Cycling Union, which had backed Armstrong's legal challenge to USADA's authority.

Armstrong, who retired last year, declined to enter arbitration -- his last option -- because he said he was weary of fighting accusations that have dogged him for years. He has consistently pointed to the hundreds of drug tests that he has passed as proof of his innocence.

34 Photos
Lance Armstrong
View the Full Gallery »

"There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now," Armstrong said in a statement sent to The Associated Press. He called the USADA investigation an "unconstitutional witch hunt."

"I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999," he said. "The toll this has taken on my family and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today -- finished with this nonsense."

USADA reacted quickly and treated Armstrong's decision as an admission of guilt, hanging the label of drug cheat on an athlete who was a hero to thousands for overcoming life-threatening testicular cancer and for his foundation's support for cancer research.

Tygart said the agency can strip the Tour titles, though Armstrong disputed that as he insisted his decision is not an admission of drug use, but a refusal to enter an arbitration process he believes is unfair.

"USADA cannot assert control of a professional international sport and attempt to strip my seven Tour de France titles," he said. "I know who won those seven Tours, my teammates know who won those seven Tours, and everyone I competed against knows who won those seven Tours."

USADA maintains that Armstrong has used banned substances as far back as 1996, including the blood-booster EPO and steroids as well as blood transfusions -- all to boost his performance.

The 40-year-old Armstrong walked away from the sport in 2011 without being charged following a two-year federal criminal investigation into many of the same accusations he faces from USADA. The federal probe was closed in February, but USADA announced in June it had evidence Armstrong used banned substances and methods -- and encouraged their use by teammates. The agency also said it had blood tests from 2009 and 2010 that were "fully consistent" with blood doping.

Included in USADA's evidence were emails written by Armstrong's former U.S. Postal Service teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title after a positive drug test. Landis' emails to a USA Cycling official detailed allegations of a complex doping program on the team.

Floyd Landis reaches deal on fraud counts

USADA also said it had 10 former Armstrong teammates ready to testify against him. Other than suggesting they include Landis and Tyler Hamilton, both of whom have admitted to doping offenses, the agency has refused to say who they are or specifically what they would say.

Watch "CBS Evening News" anchor Scott Pelley talk about his investigation for "60 Minutes" into teammates' charges that Lance Armstrong used banned drugs:

"There is zero physical evidence to support (the) outlandish and heinous claims. The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of (doping) controls I have passed with flying colors," Armstrong said.

Armstrong sued USADA in Austin, where he lives, in an attempt to block the case and was supported by the UCI, the sport's governing body. A judge threw out the case on Monday, siding with USADA despite questioning the agency's pursuit of Armstrong in his retirement.

"USADA's conduct raises serious questions about whether its real interest in charging Armstrong is to combat doping, or if it is acting according to less noble motives," such as politics or publicity, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote.

Now the ultra-competitive Armstrong has done something virtually unthinkable for him: He has quit before a fight is over.

"Today I turn the page. I will no longer address this issue, regardless of the circumstances. I will commit myself to the work I began before ever winning a single Tour de France title: serving people and families affected by cancer, especially those in underserved communities," Armstrong said.

Armstrong could have pressed his innocence in USADA's arbitration process, but the cyclist has said he believes most people have already made up their minds about whether he's a fraud or a persecuted hero.

It's a stunning move for an athlete who built his reputation on not only beating cancer, but forcing himself through grueling offseason workouts no one else could match, then crushing his rivals in the Alps and the Pyrenees.

Although he had already been crowned a world champion and won individual stages at the Tour de France, Armstrong was still relatively unknown in the U.S. until he won the epic race for the first time in 1999. It was the ultimate comeback tale: When diagnosed with cancer, doctors had given him less than a 50 percent chance of survival before surgery and brutal cycles of chemotherapy saved his life.

Armstrong's riveting victories, his work for cancer awareness and his gossip-page romances with rocker Sheryl Crow, fashion designer Tory Burch and actress Kate Hudson made him a figure who transcended sports.

His dominance of the Tour de France elevated the sport's popularity in America to unprecedented levels. His story and success helped sell millions of the "Livestrong" plastic yellow wrist bracelets, and enabled him to enlist lawmakers and global policymakers to promote cancer awareness and research. His Lance Armstrong Foundation has raised nearly $500 million since its founding in 1997.

Created in 2000, USADA is recognized by Congress as the official anti-doping agency for Olympic sports in the United States. Its investigators joined U.S. agents during the federal probe, and USADA chief executive Travis Tygart had dismissed Armstrong's lawsuit as an attempt at "concealing the truth." He said the agency is motivated by one goal -- exposing cheaters in sport.

Others close to Armstrong were caught up in the charges: Johan Bruyneel, the coach of Armstrong's teams, and three members of the medical staff and a consultant were also charged. Bruyneel is taking his case to arbitration, while two medical team staffers and consulting doctor Michele Ferrari didn't formally contest the charges and were issued lifetime ban by USADA. Ferrari later said he was innocent.

In a sport rife with cheaters, Armstrong has been under constant suspicion since the 1990s from those who refused to believe he was a clean rider winning cycling's premier event against a field of doped-up competition.

He had tense public disputes with USADA, the World Anti-Doping Agency, some former teammates and assistants and even Greg LeMond, the first American to win the Tour de France.

Through it all, Armstrong vigorously denied any and all hints, rumors and direct accusations he was cheating. He had the blazing personality, celebrity and personal wealth needed to fight back with legal and public relations battles to clear his name -- and he did, time after time.

Armstrong won his first Tour at a time when doping scandals had rocked the race. He was leading the race when a trace amount of a banned anti-inflammatory corticosteroid was found in his urine; cycling officials said he was authorized to use a small amount of a cream to treat saddle sores.

After Armstrong's second victory in 2000, French judicial officials investigated his Postal Service team for drug use. That investigation ended with no charges, but the allegations kept coming.

Armstrong was criticized for his relationship with Ferrari, who was banned by Italian authorities over doping charges in 2002. Former personal and team assistants accused Armstrong of having steroids in an apartment in Spain and disposing of syringes that were used for injections.

In 2004, a Dallas-based promotions company initially refused to pay him a $5 million bonus for winning his sixth Tour de France because it wanted to investigate allegations raised by media in Europe. Testimony in that case included former teammate Frankie Andreu and his wife, Betsy, saying Armstrong told doctors during his 1996 cancer treatments that he had taken a cornucopia of steroids and performance-enhancing drugs.

Two books published in Europe, "L.A. Confidential" and "L.A. Official," also raised doping allegations and, in 2005, French magazine L'Equipe reported that retested urine samples from the 1999 Tour showed EPO use.

Armstrong fought every accusation with denials and, in some cases, lawsuits against the European media outlets that reported them.

But he showed signs that he was tiring of the never-ending questions. Armstrong retired (for the first time) in 2005 and almost immediately considered a comeback before deciding to stay on the sidelines, in part, because he didn't want to keep answering doping questions.

"I'm sick of this," Armstrong said in 2005. "Sitting here today, dealing with all this stuff again, knowing if I were to go back, there's no way I could get a fair shake -- on the roadside, in doping control, or the labs."

But three years later, Armstrong was 36 and itching to ride again. He came back to finish third in the 2009 Tour de France.

Armstrong raced in the Tour again in 2010, under the cloud of the federal criminal investigation. Early last year, he quit the sport for good, but made a brief return as a triathlete until the USADA investigation shut him down.

During his sworn testimony in the dispute over the $5 million bonus, Armstrong said he wouldn't take performance enhancing drugs because he had too much to lose.

"(The) faith of all the cancer survivors around the world. Everything I do off the bike would go away, too," Armstrong said then. "And don't think for a second I don't understand that. It's not about money for me. Everything. It's also about the faith that people have put in me over the years. So all of that would be erased."

thoughts anyone ? (except that the quoted article is too damn long, lol)
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2012, 10:52:50 AM »
I don't care. He still achieved it.
 

bouli77

Re: USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2012, 11:03:31 AM »
fair enough.

i think it'd be legitimate to think that it's unfair to his competition but i pretty much believe everybody's doping (to an extent) in cycling. i mean who can seriously think that people can race day in day out for a month straight without resorting to drugs ?
 

Hack Wilson - real

Re: USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2012, 12:05:11 PM »
good, i hate cycling.
 

DeeezNuuuts83

Re: USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2012, 05:00:56 PM »
I don't know whether he used PEDs or not, but it's a lose-lose situation.

He passed all of the drug tests, and while there were allegations and claims, he was never really charged and found guilty of anything, though they're going at him hard now, well after the fact.  It's difficult because obviously he was fighting, and they said he was guilty.  And after years of fighting, he's tired of it and just wants to move on, and it's perceived as a sign of guilt?  There's almost no way to come back from it.

It's a lot like Manny Pacquiao's situation.  He never failed any tests, but a lot of people said that he was guilty since he didn't want to take blood tests within 24 days, even though it wasn't mandated by any athletic commission though Floyd offered a 14-day cutoff, and some people said Manny was a cheater because he didn't take the 14-day cutoff.  He later agreed to a 14-day cutoff, then Floyd said he wanted testing up until the fight, and Manny wasn't with it, and some people said Manny was a cheater because he didn't take the unlimited testing, even though he was okay with the previously suggested 14-day cutoff that his critics wanted him to take.  The next round of negotations, he agreed to unlimited testing up until the day of the fight, and then people were saying that he's a cheater because he didn't do it in the first place.  Yet in every situation, Manny said it would be okay if they drew blood immediately after the fight, but that wasn't good enough.  And even now, people are still saying he's a cheater for not taking the blood tests, though it is ironic that the two boxers found to have traces of PEDs in their system were busted with urine tests.

It's not fair, whether it's true or not, because once you're accused, it's never taken back.  Just like how now there are people who assume that Tupac really did rape that woman.
 

Hack Wilson - real

Re: USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2012, 05:05:32 PM »
i knew Lance didn't have the ball to fight this anymore
 

Shallow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7278
  • Karma: 215
  • I never had a digital pic of myself before
Re: USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2012, 09:07:28 PM »
I get so mad every time something like this happens. Steroids were initially banned for health and safety reasons, not for reasons related to cheating (shit, remember the snowboarder who was stripped of a medal for smoking weed). In my opinion if you can take something that helps you compete at your best, with out causing you imminent physical danger, you should fucking take it. Anabolic steroids and human growth hormone are medically legal substances used by doctors on human beings. There are safe limits that every human can take if done so with a doctor over seeing the dosage. There is no fucking reason why an athlete should not be able to take advantage of that reality.

But because a bunch of fucking homos who could never amount to shit athletically in their lives ended up in congress it's turned into this black mark on sports everywhere. If you have a knee injury mid season and a doctor gives you a dose of cortizone after the operation and it helps you come back faster and play better right away is that not by definition a performance enhancing drug? Also, is it not safer for your knee and prolonged health to let the knee cure naturally over a longer period of time rather than be rushed back in.

Steve Yzerman years ago played for the Red Wings. He broke his foot in the Stanley Cup Finals, and to avoid missing the series he would numb it with drugs and play on a frozen foot. They won the series. It was not illegal or seen as cheating but with out it he would have had to sit and watch from the locker room. A drug that enhanced his performance.

"Oh but what about the people that don't want to take it?" Fuck them! That's their choice. Babe Ruth played pro ball with no physical training regimen and a diet of beer and hot dogs, and he was the best fucking guy in his era (and ever). Should we force athletes to be completely natural like the Babe was? No trainers, no advanced workout routines that help increase strength and endurance? That would be stupid right?


God bless Lance Armstrong, who did everything he could to win, and if there's a guy out there that didn't take any PEDs and could have beaten Lance every time if he did take them, then I have no more sympathy for him than I have for Jamarcus Russel. Because in my mind refusing to take steroids safely when you want to be the best in the world is not much better than refusing to train and letting yourself get fat, which by the way is what happens if you juice up without training as well.

If you can find a way to win and you don't do it you're an idiot. Even spygate; the idiot isn't the guy that tries to find out the other team's signals. The idiot is the guy that would rather not know them.