Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
The Zen Master has spoken.
Hack Wilson - real:
--- Quote from: OG Black Wilson on October 18, 2012, 01:00:49 PM ---nobody with a brain was taking Pippen over Hakeem, Ewing, Barkley, Malone or Robinson 8)
--- End quote ---
i forgot Stockton too
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 18, 2012, 02:59:33 PM ---I was actually 2 years old...and you were 8. But I forget at 8 years old you develop high intellect for deep analysis lmao. But you're wrong. Shaq, Karl, Robinson, Hakeem, Barkley & Ewing were all better. Even better is that it just goes to prove my point because they're all big men lmao. EVEN BETTER is that everyone I named had to go up against each other making them respectfully "less" dominate when they went against each other. Dwight's comparison to literally nobody makes him even more dominate to the league today.
Anyway, why is that so safe to say? Pau is still a top five big man & Dwight is #1...by far. Rodman wasn't guarding him. Nash is better than Kerr..by far. Averaged 14 assists with Grant Hill last season. The only thing I'll give you is the chemistry...only because we haven't seen them yet.
But on paper, this Lakers team without Kobe would easily beat the Bulls team without MJ.
--- End quote ---
I don't know why u gota lie and exaggerate to prove ur points, I was 11 when Bulls won their last title and I was a devoted basketball fan, collectin cards at that age. But that's besides the point. U stay overrating Dwight and Nash. When did Nash ever average 14 assists? He already had his minutes drastically reduced last season due to aging. Dwight is good, but saying he's dominant and by far the best big is a joke. He's actually not even a traditional center. Comparable to al horford, lamarcus aldridge, brook lopez, chris bosh, kevin love etc. all who are better on offense.. and I've already went on record to say I prefer Bynum. I hope he changes my mind, but he's not head-and-shoulders above other premier bigs like ur acting. Calm down. Fact of the matter is, Bulls without Jordan were one of the best teams in the league. Lakers without Kobe would not be... Not yet.
Chamillitary Click:
I meant 11. Which was second in the league lmao. You're buggin'.
LooN3y:
lol the man won one ring, in which 2 other top 10 players had to help him achieve it. dont get me wrong, showtime was great, but they did it the correct way, through picks and such.
not "hey lets get together everyone and make a super team" might as well had a team of jordan, johnson, and hakeem, and mayb a mchale. shits ridiculous, and yes im going to say this every damn time.
because its just ridiculous. it depletes the level of competition.
lebron is no where near kobe or micheal. but phil always like to stir up the media
Hack Wilson - real:
--- Quote from: LooN3y on October 18, 2012, 10:35:10 PM ---lol the man won one ring, in which 2 other top 10 players had to help him achieve it. dont get me wrong, showtime was great, but they did it the correct way, through picks and such.
not "hey lets get together everyone and make a super team" might as well had a team of jordan, johnson, and hakeem, and mayb a mchale. shits ridiculous, and yes im going to say this every damn time.
because its just ridiculous. it depletes the level of competition.
lebron is no where near kobe or micheal. but phil always like to stir up the media
--- End quote ---
someone is jealous of Bron
lets not act like Lebron teamed up with KG and Rondo. if he did he'd have 2 rings by now...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version