Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
NFL mid-season report
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Russell Bell on November 06, 2012, 11:04:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on November 06, 2012, 08:41:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: Russell Bell on November 06, 2012, 06:09:18 PM ---
please you gloss over what i percieve as luck and come back with a qb had the sniffles
bottom line is, and stop me where im wrong, that the giants have been extremely lucky. whats so wrong with that?
their defense did a good job holding the pats, sure. but you cant argue my points.
--- End quote ---
Not as much as you glossed over the other facts I mentioned.
And yes I agree that the Giants offense has been very lucky in the both wins, but the Giants defense put the pressure on in both games and shut down the Pats offense twice. Of course I can't think of more than 1 playoff game Brady has looked good in since 2007 against the Jags. That one game was against the Broncos last year.
2007 against the Charges he played poorly. In the Superbowl he played mediocre at best. I 2009 against Baltimore he played like shit. In 2010 against the Jets he played almost as bad as the year before. And last year he played great against Denver but pretty bad against Baltimore and below average in the Superbowl. His entire career is legitimized by games the team won 9 years ago a nd longer; games that could have been won with Chad Pennington.
--- End quote ---
damn u hate tom brady. do u really believe all that?
--- End quote ---
Ofcourse I believe that, but I think a lot highr of Chad than most people. He's one of the smartest QBs in any era and all the 01 to 04 Pats needed was a QB that wasn't mistake prone. In the first year they won by barely even throwing for 3,000 yards, and never hit 4,000 in any of the years, about a 60% completion percentage, and a 1.8 to 1 TD to INT ratio. Brady was a very mediocre QB. Since then he's become very good, and he hasn't won any rings. In the 01 playoffs the Pats D and ST had more TDs than Brady, and Bledsoe threw for just as many.
Watch those playoff games again, ou'll see very consertaive dink and dunk offense 90% of the time squezing out very close wins on the back of the defense and special teams. Pennington could have done that. He never would have been able to do what Brady did from 07 onwards, but zero rings all the same.
Shallow Jr:
Tom Brady is an overrated piece of shit. If Peyton had those teams they would have won 15 superbowls minimum.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Shallow Jr on November 07, 2012, 12:47:26 PM ---Tom Brady is an overrated piece of shit. If Peyton had those teams they would have won 15 superbowls minimum.
--- End quote ---
I'm starting to really like you.
BiggSadot:
Giants > Pats w or w/o gronk. Its not luck when every time you meet the same team in a crucial game you beat em. Youre just better.
Wash year for my Titans. Just waitin to see what Jake does when he comes back.
Russell Bell:
--- Quote from: Shallow on November 07, 2012, 07:21:09 AM ---
--- Quote from: Russell Bell on November 06, 2012, 11:04:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on November 06, 2012, 08:41:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: Russell Bell on November 06, 2012, 06:09:18 PM ---
please you gloss over what i percieve as luck and come back with a qb had the sniffles
bottom line is, and stop me where im wrong, that the giants have been extremely lucky. whats so wrong with that?
their defense did a good job holding the pats, sure. but you cant argue my points.
--- End quote ---
Not as much as you glossed over the other facts I mentioned.
And yes I agree that the Giants offense has been very lucky in the both wins, but the Giants defense put the pressure on in both games and shut down the Pats offense twice. Of course I can't think of more than 1 playoff game Brady has looked good in since 2007 against the Jags. That one game was against the Broncos last year.
2007 against the Charges he played poorly. In the Superbowl he played mediocre at best. I 2009 against Baltimore he played like shit. In 2010 against the Jets he played almost as bad as the year before. And last year he played great against Denver but pretty bad against Baltimore and below average in the Superbowl. His entire career is legitimized by games the team won 9 years ago a nd longer; games that could have been won with Chad Pennington.
--- End quote ---
damn u hate tom brady. do u really believe all that?
--- End quote ---
Ofcourse I believe that, but I think a lot highr of Chad than most people. He's one of the smartest QBs in any era and all the 01 to 04 Pats needed was a QB that wasn't mistake prone. In the first year they won by barely even throwing for 3,000 yards, and never hit 4,000 in any of the years, about a 60% completion percentage, and a 1.8 to 1 TD to INT ratio. Brady was a very mediocre QB. Since then he's become very good, and he hasn't won any rings. In the 01 playoffs the Pats D and ST had more TDs than Brady, and Bledsoe threw for just as many.
Watch those playoff games again, ou'll see very consertaive dink and dunk offense 90% of the time squezing out very close wins on the back of the defense and special teams. Pennington could have done that. He never would have been able to do what Brady did from 07 onwards, but zero rings all the same.
--- End quote ---
So your argument is Brady was meh when he won his superbowls, then got good and cant win em, and chad penningtons a comparable qb that couldve replaced brady? uuuhhh..
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version