Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

THROWBACK: MJ passes Wilt on the NBA All-Time scoring list (2003)

(1/7) > >>

Mietek23:
http://www.youtube.com/v/YX1kDmzwKe0

Didn't found it on Youtube so I decided to post it for the fans ;)



I always wonder how many points would MJ had if he didn't retired in his prime back in 93 and was playing every season all the way to 2003... I assume he would pass Kareem as a top scorer all-time with 9 rings on his fingers 8)

Hack Wilson - real:
i think he'd have 7 rings but Hakeem would've still won in 94-95  8)

Mietek23:

--- Quote from: Larry Bird on December 08, 2012, 10:51:52 AM ---i think he'd have 7 rings but Hakeem would've still won in 94-95  8)

--- End quote ---

Yeah, that one could have gone both ways - hard to judge on it. Other than that - Bulls > NBA  8)

Hack Wilson - real:

--- Quote from: Mietek23 on December 08, 2012, 11:46:09 AM ---
--- Quote from: Larry Bird on December 08, 2012, 10:51:52 AM ---i think he'd have 7 rings but Hakeem would've still won in 94-95  8)

--- End quote ---

Yeah, that one could have gone both ways - hard to judge on it. Other than that - Bulls > NBA  8)

--- End quote ---

rockets-bulls coulda been one of the greatest finals ever too


bulls never were too successful against hakeem in the regular season

Mietek23:

--- Quote from: Larry Bird on December 08, 2012, 12:18:38 PM ---
--- Quote from: Mietek23 on December 08, 2012, 11:46:09 AM ---
--- Quote from: Larry Bird on December 08, 2012, 10:51:52 AM ---i think he'd have 7 rings but Hakeem would've still won in 94-95  8)

--- End quote ---

Yeah, that one could have gone both ways - hard to judge on it. Other than that - Bulls > NBA  8)

--- End quote ---

rockets-bulls coulda been one of the greatest finals ever too


bulls never were too successful against hakeem in the regular season

--- End quote ---

Yeah, they had great team back in the day - Hakeem, Big Shot Rob, Mad Max, The Jet etc. it would be a classic battle between them and MJ 8)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version