Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Where will the Kings play next season?
Remedy360:
Recommendation to accept or reject the sale to Hansen coming later this week which should indicate what will happen when the vote takes place in the first week of May.
DJ SUGAFREE QUIK:
I'm torn here. I'd prefer that sacramento & seattle are both in the nba. It should be either these irrelevant franchise most of america don't give 2 shits about & that's the bucks, wizards & suxers. They aren't cared about that much in their own cities. Out of those 3 i'd prefer to be the next sonics are the bucks. Mainly so I wouldn't have 2 see those hideous scarlet alternate jersey no more :puke:
Remedy360:
--- Quote from: DJ SUGAFREE QUIK on April 24, 2013, 03:34:56 AM ---I'm torn here. I'd prefer that sacramento & seattle are both in the nba. It should be either these irrelevant franchise most of america don't give 2 shits about & that's the bucks, wizards & suxers. They aren't cared about that much in their own cities. Out of those 3 i'd prefer to be the next sonics are the bucks. Mainly so I wouldn't have 2 see those hideous scarlet alternate jersey no more :puke:
--- End quote ---
Yeah, considering all teams I don't think the Kings should leave either, the question was just "what do you think will happen". Don't see how you could include Sixers or Wizards in your list though. I'd say Hornets, Grizzlies, Bobcats, Bucks, or Pacers. If you're going off recent attendance numbers obviously the Kings belong there, but their fans have been great in the past. Move a team like the Hornets, Grizzlies, or Bobcats that are always losing money playing in shit-markets. Anyways, by the NBA's own precedent the Kings are fucked because they have an old arena and an owners that have a deal with out of town guys.
Sccit:
phili, dc, and indiana all need basketball...the thing about sacramento is that it's their only sports team. i think theyll stay the year in sac, but i can see it goin either way.
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on April 24, 2013, 10:02:22 AM ---phili, dc, and indiana all need basketball...the thing about sacramento is that it's their only sports team. i think theyll stay the year in sac, but i can see it goin either way.
--- End quote ---
Yeah, Phili, DC and Indy are all huge basketball cities. I wonder if the NBA would ever go to Louisville one day. I think there are some cities that don't need an NBA team and there are some places that could be really good for the NBA. (Kansas City or St. Louis is another cities that could house an NBA team)
With that said, I say it's time for the Kings to move to Seattle. I am for the move. I miss the rivalry with the Kings and Lakers, but it's time to move on. The Kings have been in the bottom 5 in attendance every year since 2008. And Sac-Town has proven it can fill it's arena, so I am not sure what to make of this. Their arena in Sacramento does not hold as much as many other arenas now, as it holds just over 17,000 and in the early 2000's it was filled. Just like Seattle, their arena holds less than Sacramento, so the Supersonics were ranked in the 20's in attendance (though not as bad as Sacramento despite having a smaller arena) though they usually filled their arena 90%. With that, I think Seattle is a better market and I would hope the NBA would move there.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version