Author Topic: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?  (Read 495 times)

Hack Wilson - real

hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« on: June 20, 2013, 08:52:07 PM »
37 points and 12 rebounds, 5 three pointers and CLUTCH shots and free-throws in the late 4th quarter

 ;D
 

Russell Bell

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1870
  • Karma: -219
Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2013, 11:31:37 PM »
I get why NIK doesnt like the guy, I mean I dont really like kobe - i think hes an ass and a questionable teammate at times.  Lebron, he made a business decision in an extremely selfish and immature way which is very off putting, but the guy flat out tore it up and put the heat on his back.  You gotta give him the credit for that regardless of if hes a "flopper" or whatever adjective you can think of. 

Usually, if youre a fan of one particular team, and theres a mega superstar that plays for another team, that guy is gonna be love or hate for most fans.

Bottom line is - Lebron has two titles in a row that he is largely responsible for.  Cant front.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2013, 11:33:18 PM by Russell Bell »
Money like Draymond Green.....yuuup
 

Nutty

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2312
  • Karma: 100
Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2013, 04:19:12 AM »
 

Meho

Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2013, 06:09:54 AM »
Great game from Lebron. But I'm sure NIK will somehow find a way to discredit it, leading to a full blown shit talking with Cham and OP  ;D
 

M Dogg™

  • Greatest of All Time
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 12116
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Karma: 330
  • Feel the Power of the Darkside
Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2013, 08:36:01 AM »
As I have said all year. Best player in the world today. He proved it in a game 7, when it matters. I'm sure NIK will site the end of game 6. But in reality, that's the hand that was dealt, and LeBron responded. Plus any Laker fan who talks about questionable playoff series, we can never forget 2002. At the same time, that's the hand the teams were dealt and the Lakers won. In 2013, LeBron responded with a great performance. Best player in the world. The question is, will the Heat be the best team in the world in 2013-2014? Can LeBron once again left his half dead team to yet another title? We'll see.
 

Sccit

Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2013, 11:45:00 AM »
he had more bad games than good ones in this series...u can thank the spurs for chokin this one away, which was also pretty great to see. duncan missing that point blank shot to tie the game was priceless, and now it's official, duncan will never be compared to kobe and the spurs are a notch under the lakers in this generation. but lebron got bailed out big time by that kawhi leanord missed free throw followed by a ray allen three.....if that sequence never happened in game 6, we'd be singin a totally different tune. lebron did step up in game 7, with a lot of help from wade (who i think carried the team in the most important moments)....u can also attribute those 5 threes by lebron to the spurs game plan, because they were so used to lebron bricking shots that they left him wide open the entire game. but credit where credit is due, congrats lebron, he won another one and got a back-to-back.......it's still fuck lebron, and my opinion on him has not changed tho :D

Hack Wilson - real

Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2013, 12:04:15 PM »
congrats lebron, he won another one and got a back-to-back.......it's still fuck lebron, and my opinion on him has not changed tho :D

this is all you needed to say :D
 

Citizen-Y

Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2013, 03:38:32 PM »
And if a Vlade Divac swat off a Shaq miss didn't bounce right to Robert Horry the Kings would have won that series.  The better team wins a 7 game series.
 

Russell Bell

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1870
  • Karma: -219
Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2013, 05:14:05 PM »
The better team wins a 7 game series.

this.

football is more random than basketball, by a long shot.  look at teams like the ny giants winning superbowls because of one play (sorry Hack).  thats luck.  a 7 game series, you have every opportunity to take luck and rape it into submission.  which is what the great teams do.
Money like Draymond Green.....yuuup
 

Hack Wilson - real

Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2013, 05:25:33 PM »
The better team wins a 7 game series.

this.

football is more random than basketball, by a long shot.  look at teams like the ny giants winning superbowls because of one play (sorry Hack).  thats luck.  a 7 game series, you have every opportunity to take luck and rape it into submission.  which is what the great teams do.

replace "lucky play" with "great catch".  and in 2011-12 the Giants beat the Patriots twice that season, that is not luck.  beating a great team twice is tough as hell because they've seen everything you had already. 

Don't be bitter at the other teams in the NFL because the refs fixed your Seahawks superbowl lol
 

M Dogg™

  • Greatest of All Time
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 12116
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Karma: 330
  • Feel the Power of the Darkside
Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2013, 07:51:32 PM »
The better team wins a 7 game series.

this.

football is more random than basketball, by a long shot.  look at teams like the ny giants winning superbowls because of one play (sorry Hack).  thats luck.  a 7 game series, you have every opportunity to take luck and rape it into submission.  which is what the great teams do.

One game, I disagree. Basketball is more random in the you can a hot streak, or lucky plays. In a 7 game series, the better team wins in basketball over the one game of football.
 

Hack Wilson - real

Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2013, 08:28:27 PM »
having an upset in a 7 game series is very hard..hence why we haven't had many finals upsets over the last 20 years.  less than the fingers on your hand.


but still, the Giants own the Patriots.  2 SB's ain't no joke :)
 

BabyBird

  • Guest
Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #12 on: June 22, 2013, 09:17:08 AM »
Ur lying 2 yourself if you think u r a basketball player/ baller
Ya nah mean
 

Remedy360

  • Guest
Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #13 on: June 22, 2013, 09:05:23 PM »
The better team wins a 7 game series.

this.

football is more random than basketball, by a long shot.  look at teams like the ny giants winning superbowls because of one play (sorry Hack).  thats luck.  a 7 game series, you have every opportunity to take luck and rape it into submission.  which is what the great teams do.

replace "lucky play" with "great catch".  and in 2011-12 the Giants beat the Patriots twice that season, that is not luck.  beating a great team twice is tough as hell because they've seen everything you had already. 

Don't be bitter at the other teams in the NFL because the refs fixed your Seahawks superbowl lol

Russell isn't a Seahawks fan. Did you get the "R" members mixed up.
 

Hack Wilson - real

Re: hey NIK is that good enough for ya?
« Reply #14 on: June 23, 2013, 11:22:46 AM »
i guess i did