Lifestyle > Train of Thought

the Trayvon trial is being used to distract America from this...

<< < (2/4) > >>

Sami:
You're proving my statement more and more.

"socialist" LMAO

Teddy Roosevelt:
That article is complete bullshit. All the Supreme Court said was that generic drug manufacturers can't be sued in state court for a drug's design defects if federal officials approved the brand-name version the generic drug copied. The ruling only applied to generic drug companies being sued in state courts if the federal government approved the drug. It's just a federalism issue.

Russell Bell:

--- Quote from: Sami on July 10, 2013, 04:33:51 PM ---You're proving my statement more and more.

"socialist" LMAO

--- End quote ---

teddy what you pointed out is duly noted but i wanna make a point here - i get what infinite is trying to say.  there are too many lawsuits coming from retards like gloria allred and folks like her, but drug companies are a whole different animal.  we havent even scratched the surface as to what all this adderrall and bullshit theyre force feeding any kid who cant pay attention for an hr straight in school is doing to our society.  but then again, its a free choice made by the parents to give them this shit.  if they were awake, they probably wouldnt.  but theyve allowed themselves to be basically brainwashed.

keep in mind i dont agree with new regulation or laws on much of anything.  generally speaking.  if we enforced the laws we had correctly we wouldnt be in the clusterfuck we find ourselves in half the time.   

heyyou:

--- Quote from: Infinite African Westcoastin 2012 and 13' on July 10, 2013, 02:18:37 PM ---shit... they need to exempt more businesses from lawsuits.  There's too damn many laws and too damn many lawyers as there is...



--- End quote ---

Are you serious?

I agree that businesses should have less regulation, but they shouldn't be exempt when breaking common law (loss, harm or injury). Nobody should be above the law.

Regulation is different to recourse and remedy in the courts. If you or I were harmed say by some vaccine that has a safety issue, ie mmr,  tamiflu or medicine infected with the aids virus I'd sure want to prosecute against them.
Immunity, whether it's corporate or diplomatic is one reason for the corrupt state and mess the world is in!

TraceOneInfinite:

--- Quote from: heyyou on July 13, 2013, 06:25:01 AM ---
Are you serious?

I agree that businesses should have less regulation, but they shouldn't be exempt when breaking common law (loss, harm or injury). Nobody should be above the law.

Regulation is different to recourse and remedy in the courts. If you or I were harmed say by some vaccine that has a safety issue, ie mmr,  tamiflu or medicine infected with the aids virus I'd sure want to prosecute against them.
Immunity, whether it's corporate or diplomatic is one reason for the corrupt state and mess the world is in!

--- End quote ---

What about personal responsibility?

A drug company doing harm to someone is different from me beating someone's ass.  And the difference is a very important difference and it makes all the difference in the world.  The difference is the use of force.  America is a country that was founded on individual liberty.  If I beat someone's ass then I have infringed upon their individual liberty.  But a drug company selling a drug on a market is not infringing upon anyone's liberty.  Each individual has a right to buy the drug or not buy the drug according to their own free will.  This should be no business of the government. 

We can take it a step further and say that if the government got out of the drug business and the FDA were closed down (as Ron Paul advocated) then it would open up the market for the consumer advocate industry and they could better aid us in guiding us as to which medicines or vaccines we should purchase.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version