Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
NBA PLAYERS WITH NEW TEAMS THIS SEASON
whoisthis:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on July 23, 2013, 04:52:30 PM ---FOREAL...PHILADELPHIA, THE WORST CITY HE COULDA GONE TO
LOOKING AT THE LIST, THE BIGGEST WINNERS LOOK LIKE THE CAVS, THE NETS, THE MAVS, THE PELICANS, AND THE LAKERS
--- End quote ---
Just out of curiosity, how does Kaman/Young/Farmar/Wes Johnson beat out Redick/Collison/Dudley/Mullens?
Or Iggy/Speights/O'Neal/Douglas?
No need for an argument. Just want to see your thought process.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: whoisthis on August 05, 2013, 07:34:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on July 23, 2013, 04:52:30 PM ---FOREAL...PHILADELPHIA, THE WORST CITY HE COULDA GONE TO
LOOKING AT THE LIST, THE BIGGEST WINNERS LOOK LIKE THE CAVS, THE NETS, THE MAVS, THE PELICANS, AND THE LAKERS
--- End quote ---
Just out of curiosity, how does Kaman/Young/Farmar/Wes Johnson beat out Redick/Collison/Dudley/Mullens?
Or Iggy/Speights/O'Neal/Douglas?
No need for an argument. Just want to see your thought process.
--- End quote ---
U BEIN SERIOUS? LMAO
KAMAN>>>>>MULLENS
WES>DUDLEY
YOUNG>>>REDICK
FARMAR<COLLISON
AND GOLDEN STATE HAD TO GIVE UP DRAFT PICKS AND PLAYERS TO GET IGGY...DONT FOGET THAT RUSSELL BELL, OUR RESIDENT WARRIOR FAN, WASNT EVEN HAPPY WIT THE TRADE WHEN IT WAS GOIN DOWN.
OTHER THAN THAT, SPEIGHTS, O'NEAL, AND DOUGLAS ARE LUCKY TO BE MAKING NBA ROSTERS LOL....WE GOT BETTER ALL AROUND.
whoisthis:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 05, 2013, 08:31:35 PM ---
--- Quote from: whoisthis on August 05, 2013, 07:34:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on July 23, 2013, 04:52:30 PM ---FOREAL...PHILADELPHIA, THE WORST CITY HE COULDA GONE TO
LOOKING AT THE LIST, THE BIGGEST WINNERS LOOK LIKE THE CAVS, THE NETS, THE MAVS, THE PELICANS, AND THE LAKERS
--- End quote ---
Just out of curiosity, how does Kaman/Young/Farmar/Wes Johnson beat out Redick/Collison/Dudley/Mullens?
Or Iggy/Speights/O'Neal/Douglas?
No need for an argument. Just want to see your thought process.
--- End quote ---
U BEIN SERIOUS? LMAO
KAMAN>>>>>MULLENS
WES>DUDLEY
YOUNG>>>REDICK
FARMAR<COLLISON
AND GOLDEN STATE HAD TO GIVE UP DRAFT PICKS AND PLAYERS TO GET IGGY...DONT FOGET THAT RUSSELL BELL, OUR RESIDENT WARRIOR FAN, WASNT EVEN HAPPY WIT THE TRADE WHEN IT WAS GOIN DOWN.
OTHER THAN THAT, SPEIGHTS, O'NEAL, AND DOUGLAS ARE LUCKY TO BE MAKING NBA ROSTERS LOL....WE GOT BETTER ALL AROUND.
--- End quote ---
I'll give you Kaman > Mullens. But Young > Redick? Wow. Redick and Young were brought on to these teams for their shooting. Redick > Young. Also, if you think Wesley Johnson is better than Dudley, then something is seriously wrong. Dudley has shot at least 45% from the field and 38% from 3, all but 1 season. Wesley Johnson has never shot over 41% and only over 40% from the field, 1 time. From 3? Never higher than 36% (1 time) and more recently 31 and 32%. You can't be serious.
As for GSW
Iggy >>>>>>>>> Young
Speights > Johnson
Douglas <<< Farmar
O'Neal = Kaman You get slightly more offense from Kaman. Better defense from O'Neal.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: whoisthis on August 05, 2013, 09:58:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 05, 2013, 08:31:35 PM ---
--- Quote from: whoisthis on August 05, 2013, 07:34:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on July 23, 2013, 04:52:30 PM ---FOREAL...PHILADELPHIA, THE WORST CITY HE COULDA GONE TO
LOOKING AT THE LIST, THE BIGGEST WINNERS LOOK LIKE THE CAVS, THE NETS, THE MAVS, THE PELICANS, AND THE LAKERS
--- End quote ---
Just out of curiosity, how does Kaman/Young/Farmar/Wes Johnson beat out Redick/Collison/Dudley/Mullens?
Or Iggy/Speights/O'Neal/Douglas?
No need for an argument. Just want to see your thought process.
--- End quote ---
U BEIN SERIOUS? LMAO
KAMAN>>>>>MULLENS
WES>DUDLEY
YOUNG>>>REDICK
FARMAR<COLLISON
AND GOLDEN STATE HAD TO GIVE UP DRAFT PICKS AND PLAYERS TO GET IGGY...DONT FOGET THAT RUSSELL BELL, OUR RESIDENT WARRIOR FAN, WASNT EVEN HAPPY WIT THE TRADE WHEN IT WAS GOIN DOWN.
OTHER THAN THAT, SPEIGHTS, O'NEAL, AND DOUGLAS ARE LUCKY TO BE MAKING NBA ROSTERS LOL....WE GOT BETTER ALL AROUND.
--- End quote ---
I'll give you Kaman > Mullens. But Young > Redick? Wow. Redick and Young were brought on to these teams for their shooting. Redick > Young. Also, if you think Wesley Johnson is better than Dudley, then something is seriously wrong. Dudley has shot at least 45% from the field and 38% from 3, all but 1 season. Wesley Johnson has never shot over 41% and only over 40% from the field, 1 time. From 3? Never higher than 36% (1 time) and more recently 31 and 32%. You can't be serious.
As for GSW
Iggy >>>>>>>>> Young
Speights > Johnson
Douglas <<< Farmar
O'Neal = Kaman You get slightly more offense from Kaman. Better defense from O'Neal.
--- End quote ---
LMAO... No, nick young and jj redick were brought in for their scoring, not their shooting. Nick young has better handles, can finish at the rim, create his own shot. Just a better overall scorer,
which is why he's averaged 17+ ppg with the wizards. jj redick is a better facilitator, I'll give him that, but nick young is the much better overall player. And the reason I say Wes>Dudley is not only cuz his ceiling is much higher, but also cuz they both played for the Suns last year, and while the familiar dudley got the playing time to start the season, Wes Johnson eventually beat him for the startin spot and ended the season a lot stronger than Dudley.
Oneal=kaman is the only thing laughable. Oneal will be lucky to play 40 games this year with the health he's in. Kaman is a qualified starter, jermaine has been a 2nd/3rd string bench player for 5+ years ... Come on brobro.. Ur talkin about a jermaine Oneal who's around averaged 6 points and 5 rebounds in 18 minutes for years now lol whoisthis
whoisthis:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 06, 2013, 01:16:39 AM ---
LMAO... No, nick young and jj redick were brought in for their scoring, not their shooting. Nick young has better handles, can finish at the rim, create his own shot. Just a better overall scorer,
which is why he's averaged 17+ ppg with the wizards. jj redick is a better facilitator, I'll give him that, but nick young is the much better overall player. And the reason I say Wes>Dudley is not only cuz his ceiling is much higher, but also cuz they both played for the Suns last year, and while the familiar dudley got the playing time to start the season, Wes Johnson eventually beat him for the startin spot and ended the season a lot stronger than Dudley.
Oneal=kaman is the only thing laughable. Oneal will be lucky to play 40 games this year with the health he's in. Kaman is a qualified starter, jermaine has been a 2nd/3rd string bench player for 5+ years ... Come on brobro.. Ur talkin about a jermaine Oneal who's around averaged 6 points and 5 rebounds in 18 minutes for years now lol whoisthis
--- End quote ---
The scoring provided by Redick is a secondary issue for the Clippers. They have BG and CP3 who are their primary scorers. Redick (and Dudley) were brought in strictly for spacing since they're knock down shooters. He's replacing Chauncey/Willie Green in the starting Line up. Young's scoring, again, is more secondary for the Lakers. They have Kobe, Pau and Nash. Young is there to hit the open shot. He's essentially replacing Ron Artest's poor decision making with better shooting ability, just absolutely no defense. Remember when he scored those 17PPG, it was on a terrible Wizards team and John Wall & Andray Blatche both scored in the mid-to-high teens as well. Point being, scoring well on a team with no identity who is horrible, is not the situation he'll be in here. For a better example of who the Lakers will be getting, look at what Nick Young did as a Clipper in that second half 11-12 season. About 10 points. 35% from 3. He will not have enough possessions to put up almost 15 shots a night and he's not a efficient enough shooter to score 17+ without them. Hence, Redick > Young.
Dudley fell out of favor with Lindsey Hunter more than Wes Johnson beat him out. Hunter rode more of the younger players in the 2nd half of the season. As for their ceilings... Wes Johnson hasn't shown that he can get off the floor. Dudley has been a consistent player throughout his career. He was brought in for Defense, Shooting and Consistency. He fits those bills. That's why Dudley > Johnson.
You do realize that Kaman is often injured himself, right? And, when you consider the roles each are needed to play, it's much more important for Kaman to stay healthy, which he has a hard time doing. As far as numbers go. JO had 2 rough seasons in Boston due to injuries, which is why he put up the numbers he did. But, last season, he put up 8 and 5 off the bench in under 20 minutes a night while playing in about as many games last season as he had the 2 previous seasons combined. That's comparable to the 10 and 5 Kaman put up as a starter in slightly over 20. Again, I'll give you that overall, Kaman is a better Offensive talent. Defensively, you'll get more out of O'Neal. There's no real winner between those 2.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version