Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
KOBE VOTED FAVORITE PLAYER IN THE LEAGUE AMONGST ROOKIES......
Chamillitary Click:
Na, son watched "highlight" tape of Magic. He's a regular connoisseur lmao.
whoisthis:
That could be. And, obviously, hypocritically, I was a fan of guys like McGwire when I was very young, too. But, I also had a large sample size of McGwire to watch from then on, whereas a guy like Magic was gone by 91. I don't know that going back and watching Highlight reels is really the same. Part of what makes sports great is being in the moment. Being in that moment of the Pennant Race. Watching a Game 7 and NOT knowing the outcome. Etc.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: whoisthis on September 03, 2013, 05:17:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 29, 2013, 09:40:16 PM ---the first player i followed was magic johnson....unfortunately, i didnt get to see him for his entire career. when kobe first came in to the league, of course magic was still my favorite. 10 years later, it's quite obvious why i'd have more of a relation to kobe, watchin him grow as a player from day 1......kobe, duncan, garnett, kidd were the players for those born in the 80s...lebron, melo, wade, durant for the 90s babies...irving, lillard, steph, harden are the players for kids from the 2000s. it's pretty obvious, really.
and c-webb is not on the same superstardom level as the players were talkin bout, so goin there is obviously a weak argument.
--- End quote ---
How old are you exactly? Magic stopped playing in 90-91. I don't think you're my age, but I could be wrong. I'm guessing you were born 87 or so. I hardly call being a fan of someone at the age of 2 or 3 constitutes as "following." Unless, of course, you're older. You seem to be more exception, than rule. I just go by people I know. Friends. Family. So on. My brother was born 1980. He loved Magic and when Magic retired it was Malone. Many of my older buddies who were born in 81-83 are all Jordan fans. What I think you mean to say is: People who got into Basketball in the late 90's until about the mid 2000's relate to Kobe, Duncan, Garnett and J.Kidd. People who got into Basketball from the mid 2000's until about the next few years will relate to LeBron, Melo, Wade, Durant etc.
And C-Webb fits your bill of star rookie. Think about it. He had a great High School career and was the National Player of the Year. In College, he was apart of one of the most talked about teams ever, the Fab 5. They had plenty of hype, plenty of attention. He only spent 2 years in College, but both years he took his team to the Championship Game. He was the number 1 pick after that.
--- End quote ---
i was old enough to shit my pants when magic retured for a season in '95.....and yea, cats born in the 80s usually become old enough to really start following basketball in the 90s, hence being able to relate more to the kidd-kobe-garnett-duncan class of players....and thats from experience. now, chris webber is not a 1st tier star, so u wont find nearly as many cats claimin him their favorite as u would the others i mentioned. he was a great player, yes...but he was 1 step under the class of malones, barkleys, duncans, etc.
--- Quote from: whoisthis on September 03, 2013, 05:17:10 PM ---
--- Quote ---if u watched LeBron for his entire career, from hearing about him being a high school phenom about to enter the nba, wouldnt u relate more to him 10 years later, when u can say uv seen him grow and go through it all and grew watching him become the player he is
--- End quote ---
I watched C-Webb his entire career. I remember watching him in College, I watched him enter the NBA. 10 years later, I didn't relate anymore to him than I did before. I watched him grow into a real leader on the Kings. But, it didn't change a thing. He wasn't the best when I started following.
That's why your point is obviously a weak argument.
--- End quote ---
just because ur an exception to the rule doesnt make my argument weak...if watching chris webber his entire career didnt help u relate to him or feel more of a personal attachment, that doesn't necessarily mean its the same for everyone.
--- Quote from: whoisthis on September 03, 2013, 05:17:10 PM ---
I was born 84. My favorite Pro-Wrestler was Hulk Hogan. Why? Because I started watching Wrestling when he was on top. You know who I hated? Shawn Michaels. Why? Because I thought the Rockers were a shitty Tag Team and I never bought into his character. But, ask someone who got into Wrestling in the early to mid 90s, they'll tell you Shawn Michaels was their guy.
My favorite players in Baseball were virtually any mix of Mark McGwire, Kirk Gibson, Jose Canseco, Ricky Henderson or Orel Hershiser. Why? Being from California was a major factor and because in and around 88 was when I started playing Tee-Ball and going to Dodger games with my team and my dad (or A's games with family in the Bay). The A's and Dodgers played in the Series that year. Why wasn't I into guys like Dave Justice, Sandy Alomar or Jeff Bagwell (all amazing players, but not guys that I could say are my favorite)? Because they just weren't the best or playing for the best when they came into the league.
In Football, obviously being in California I had a lot of choices. Being from L.A., the obvious choices were the Rams who were terrible and the Raiders who my dad taught me to hate. Branching out, closest to me was the Chargers. I remember my dad listening to Mighty 690 (which was the a sports Radio station in San Diego that we would get up here in L.A.). But, i couldn't get into them. That left the Niners. I had obviously heard about and saw Montana, but it wasn't until I really was able to follow the game that I got into the Niners. Watching Young and Rice with Ricky Watters on Offense and Hanks and Norton on Defense left an impression on me. Those were my favorite players. Not guys like Marshall Faulk or Jerome Bettis.
I say all that to say this: Everyone is different and will find one thing or another to relate to a person, place or thing. Typically, when it comes to being a fan of something, the person will relate to what is popular, because it's easier to understand.
--- End quote ---
everyone is different....money. but ur an exception to the rule, so talkin about urself is useless in this situation, bottom line. and players born in 94-95 (this years draft class) are much more likely to relate to lebron, wade, and melo than kobe, duncan, kidd....thats all there really is to it. these cats were 1 years old when kobe was a rookie....ur arguing simply because u like to argue against me. whoisthis?
whoisthis:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on September 03, 2013, 06:30:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: whoisthis on September 03, 2013, 05:17:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on August 29, 2013, 09:40:16 PM ---the first player i followed was magic johnson....unfortunately, i didnt get to see him for his entire career. when kobe first came in to the league, of course magic was still my favorite. 10 years later, it's quite obvious why i'd have more of a relation to kobe, watchin him grow as a player from day 1......kobe, duncan, garnett, kidd were the players for those born in the 80s...lebron, melo, wade, durant for the 90s babies...irving, lillard, steph, harden are the players for kids from the 2000s. it's pretty obvious, really.
and c-webb is not on the same superstardom level as the players were talkin bout, so goin there is obviously a weak argument.
--- End quote ---
How old are you exactly? Magic stopped playing in 90-91. I don't think you're my age, but I could be wrong. I'm guessing you were born 87 or so. I hardly call being a fan of someone at the age of 2 or 3 constitutes as "following." Unless, of course, you're older. You seem to be more exception, than rule. I just go by people I know. Friends. Family. So on. My brother was born 1980. He loved Magic and when Magic retired it was Malone. Many of my older buddies who were born in 81-83 are all Jordan fans. What I think you mean to say is: People who got into Basketball in the late 90's until about the mid 2000's relate to Kobe, Duncan, Garnett and J.Kidd. People who got into Basketball from the mid 2000's until about the next few years will relate to LeBron, Melo, Wade, Durant etc.
And C-Webb fits your bill of star rookie. Think about it. He had a great High School career and was the National Player of the Year. In College, he was apart of one of the most talked about teams ever, the Fab 5. They had plenty of hype, plenty of attention. He only spent 2 years in College, but both years he took his team to the Championship Game. He was the number 1 pick after that.
--- End quote ---
i was old enough to shit my pants when magic retured for a season in '95.....and yea, cats born in the 80s usually become old enough to really start following basketball in the 90s, hence being able to relate more to the kidd-kobe-garnett-duncan class of players....and thats from experience. now, chris webber is not a 1st tier star, so u wont find nearly as many cats claimin him their favorite as u would the others i mentioned. he was a great player, yes...but he was 1 step under the class of malones, barkleys, duncans, etc.
--- End quote ---
It depends on when they're born my friend. Like I said earlier, anywhere from 9 to 11 is where most kids I knew really started following a sport religiously. Do the math, most of my friends and family are all into Players who were popular around that time frame in their lives. You're the exception and not the rule, as I stated before. As for C-Webb. I'm merely going by your way of thinking. Popular player before the pros. High draft pick. Lots of hype. Just like LeBron. And while C-Webb will never be considered one of the best ever, at that moment when he came into league, how would I have known that? Why didn't I relate to him? Why didn't any of my buddies around that same time relate to him? He wasn't the best. That's the point. "Your favorite" is something that comes in the moment.
--- Quote from: whoisthis on September 03, 2013, 05:17:10 PM ---
--- Quote ---if u watched LeBron for his entire career, from hearing about him being a high school phenom about to enter the nba, wouldnt u relate more to him 10 years later, when u can say uv seen him grow and go through it all and grew watching him become the player he is
--- End quote ---
I watched C-Webb his entire career. I remember watching him in College, I watched him enter the NBA. 10 years later, I didn't relate anymore to him than I did before. I watched him grow into a real leader on the Kings. But, it didn't change a thing. He wasn't the best when I started following.
That's why your point is obviously a weak argument.
just because ur an exception to the rule doesnt make my argument weak...if watching chris webber his entire career didnt help u relate to him or feel more of a personal attachment, that doesn't necessarily mean its the same for everyone.
--- End quote ---
Please see the bold and refer to your original point.
--- Quote from: whoisthis on September 03, 2013, 05:17:10 PM ---
I was born 84. My favorite Pro-Wrestler was Hulk Hogan. Why? Because I started watching Wrestling when he was on top. You know who I hated? Shawn Michaels. Why? Because I thought the Rockers were a shitty Tag Team and I never bought into his character. But, ask someone who got into Wrestling in the early to mid 90s, they'll tell you Shawn Michaels was their guy.
My favorite players in Baseball were virtually any mix of Mark McGwire, Kirk Gibson, Jose Canseco, Ricky Henderson or Orel Hershiser. Why? Being from California was a major factor and because in and around 88 was when I started playing Tee-Ball and going to Dodger games with my team and my dad (or A's games with family in the Bay). The A's and Dodgers played in the Series that year. Why wasn't I into guys like Dave Justice, Sandy Alomar or Jeff Bagwell (all amazing players, but not guys that I could say are my favorite)? Because they just weren't the best or playing for the best when they came into the league.
In Football, obviously being in California I had a lot of choices. Being from L.A., the obvious choices were the Rams who were terrible and the Raiders who my dad taught me to hate. Branching out, closest to me was the Chargers. I remember my dad listening to Mighty 690 (which was the a sports Radio station in San Diego that we would get up here in L.A.). But, i couldn't get into them. That left the Niners. I had obviously heard about and saw Montana, but it wasn't until I really was able to follow the game that I got into the Niners. Watching Young and Rice with Ricky Watters on Offense and Hanks and Norton on Defense left an impression on me. Those were my favorite players. Not guys like Marshall Faulk or Jerome Bettis.
I say all that to say this: Everyone is different and will find one thing or another to relate to a person, place or thing. Typically, when it comes to being a fan of something, the person will relate to what is popular, because it's easier to understand.
everyone is different....money. but ur an exception to the rule, so talkin about urself is useless in this situation, bottom line. and players born in 94-95 (this years draft class) are much more likely to relate to lebron, wade, and melo than kobe, duncan, kidd....thats all there really is to it. these cats were 1 years old when kobe was a rookie....ur arguing simply because u like to argue against me. whoisthis?
--- End quote ---
I know everyone is different... money. I said that. I also said you were the exception, not the rule. Talking about myself is more of a way to show that it's not just 1 Sport, it's multiple. Talking about my sibling, my friends etc. is again, a way to show that there's a reason for my way of thinking. Bottom line, players born in 94-95 more than likely started watching Basketball religiously just like any other kid. Somewhere between the ages of 9 and 11. That puts them right in line with Kobe being at the height of popularity. It's not about relating. It's about who they see first. If you can dismiss me not being to a star like C-Webb when he was a rookie, what makes these kids different with LeBron? Outside of being able to prove your point... nothing.
You're arguing simply because you like to argue against me.
Sccit:
because when u have a talent like lebron, who is comin in as one of the most glorified rookies ever, and then 10 years later he's considered the best player in the world, it's much easier to relate and build a more personal bond through followin since day 1+bein able to say u grew watching him become the "the best", witnessed his entire career, etc... these cats comin in nowadays are barely old enough to have seen kobe in his threepeat days lol...come on, now. it's more like common sense.
and even if u truly believe that cats born in 95 are more likely to be kobe fans- fact remains, those cats have only seen about half of kobe's career, while its safe to say they've seen lebron's entire career...again, it's common sense. they know lebron closer, theres no arguin that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version