Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Doc Rivers: "Lakers are the best franchise in the history of sports"
Hack Wilson - real:
also the Yankees have 16 more titles than the nearest team. Hard to refute that Nikki.
Hack Wilson - real:
true, Kobe Bryant has nothing on Mariano Rivera. Rivera is the best player ever at his position...Kobe? not even close.
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 01, 2013, 08:48:07 AM ---I've already spoken countlessly on this forum about the integrity of the NBA. It's embarrassing that two teams (Celtics and Lakers) have combined more titles than the rest of the league in history.
Even more that in theory, the Bulls could of won eight titles in one decade.
--- End quote ---
Sccit:
--- Quote from: whoisthis on October 02, 2013, 08:59:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on October 02, 2013, 07:57:15 PM ---
NOT SPINNING ANYTHING...IM STATING FACTS. LEARN THE DIFFERENCE.
--- End quote ---
Of course you are. Everything I posted was a fact, as well. Learn the difference.
27 Rings > 16
27 Rings > 17
13 Losses > 15
27-13 > 16-15
27-13 > 17-15
27/101 < 16/65
27/101 < 17/65
16/65 < 17/65
17/65 = 17/65
27/101 > 11/102
These are all factual numbers
The most impressive? 27 Rings to 11.
The next best Baseball team needs 16 more rings to even tie the Yankees. The Lakers are behind (or tied depending who [NIK] you talk to) the Celtics. Based on this FACT and all of the other facts: Yankees are the best franchise ever in Sports.
Lastly,
Ruth. Mantle. DiMaggio. Gehrig. Jeter. Berra. Mattingly. Rivera. Jackson. > Johnson. Bryant. Jabbar. West. Baylor. O'Neal. Worthy. Goodrich. Chamberlain.
And when you look at that list for the Yankees, there's still so many players that I haven't even listed.
--- End quote ---
just because theres more competitive teams in basketball than there is in baseball doesnt change the fact that the lakers STILL have a higher success rate.
and at the end of the day, thats all it really comes down to
i do gota say, arguing baseball players vs basketball players with a ">" sign has to be one of the more retarded things i've witnessed in this sports section lol...and trust me, i've seen a lot of retardation around here. i know hack liked that one, tho
anyways, we just goin in circles...i really dont see the point. ur just gunna say "but the yankees have more titles and are more dominant" again, and im just gunna reply with "but the lakers have a higher success rate".........................................
whoisthis:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 02, 2013, 09:13:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 01, 2013, 08:48:07 AM ---I've already spoken countlessly on this forum about the integrity of the NBA. It's embarrassing that two teams (Celtics and Lakers) have combined more titles than the rest of the league in history.
Even more that in theory, the Bulls could of won eight titles in one decade.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Yeah. Basketball is a Sport where 9 out of 10 times the team with the Best player at that time wins.
In Baseball, I direct your attention the 2011 Dodgers. Kemp was the 2nd runner up to Braun in the MVP race and Kershaw was the NL Cy Young. The team barely played .500. Baseball is a true team sport. You won't win based on the fact that you have a guy hitting 50+ home runs in a season, ask the Orioles. You won't win even if you have the best lights out pitcher.
--- Quote from: NIKCC on October 02, 2013, 09:24:27 PM ---
just because theres more competitive teams in basketball than there is in baseball doesnt change the fact that the lakers STILL have a higher success rate.
and at the end of the day, thats all it really comes down to
i do gota say, arguing baseball players vs basketball players with a ">" sign has to be one of the more retarded things i've witnessed in this sports section lol...and trust me, i've seen a lot of retardation around here. i know hack liked that one, tho
anyways, we just goin in circles...i really dont see the point. ur just gunna say "but the yankees have more titles and are more dominant" again, and im just gunna reply with "but the lakers have a higher success rate".........................................
--- End quote ---
ANNNNNND now we know you've nothing else to say when the insults come out.
You must not understand Baseball at all if you think there are not that many competitive teams. Sorry, but that's a fact. You cannot sit here with a straight face and tell me you understand Baseball if you think that's true.
But, the fact remains, the Celtics have the same success rate as the Lakers and the Yankees are a mere 1.8% away.
What you fail to understand is that I'm not "arguing baseball players vs basketball players." I'm stating the fact that the Yankees have had many more ICONS/LEGENDS play for their squads, as opposed to the Lakers.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version