Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Man's best friend
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 27, 2014, 12:04:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 11:00:32 AM ---
--- Quote from: KrazySumwhat on January 27, 2014, 05:10:56 AM --- I could never buy/own a dog. All them porno's i seen would make it fucked up.
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you watched many pornos involving dogs?
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you are surprised about that (you know we are talking about Krazy, right?)
--- End quote ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
so watching bestiality is low, but gay porn is not? GOT U
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 28, 2014, 04:05:10 AM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 28, 2014, 01:57:51 AM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
Why is that a low Fraxxx. If nobody gets hurt in the process and they don't bother you with it, who cares.
Or do we have got a norm? And if so, who decides these norms?
And how can they change?
That is a philosophical question my friend.
--- End quote ---
No it's not. You really want me to argue against zoophilia to the point where you can say "Hah, and the same goes for hoomooes!" (preferably in a British accent)? If you can't come up with something solid yourself I can't help you. I am against zoophilia and so are you, I presume. So I don't see the benefit in wasting my time on discussing it (Cause writing these textes is time-consuming, after all. For me, anyway). If someone truly would be in favor of it, I might argue against it. But you're just playing Devil's Advocate here to turn this around on me. Don't think so. Also wouldn't work :) The burden of proof is on you. Most basic scientific principle there is.
--- End quote ---
"there is no logical reason to be against it"
Ghost Drebin:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 02:04:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 27, 2014, 12:04:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 11:00:32 AM ---
--- Quote from: KrazySumwhat on January 27, 2014, 05:10:56 AM --- I could never buy/own a dog. All them porno's i seen would make it fucked up.
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you watched many pornos involving dogs?
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you are surprised about that (you know we are talking about Krazy, right?)
--- End quote ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
so watching bestiality is low, but gay porn is not? GOT U
--- End quote ---
Are you saying that a man having sex with another man is just as low as a human having sex with a dog? If you said both were unnatural I would agree, but surely you can see the levels in lowness?
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Ghost Drebin on January 29, 2014, 02:18:32 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 02:04:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 27, 2014, 12:04:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 11:00:32 AM ---
--- Quote from: KrazySumwhat on January 27, 2014, 05:10:56 AM --- I could never buy/own a dog. All them porno's i seen would make it fucked up.
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you watched many pornos involving dogs?
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you are surprised about that (you know we are talking about Krazy, right?)
--- End quote ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
so watching bestiality is low, but gay porn is not? GOT U
--- End quote ---
Are you saying that a man having sex with another man is just as low as a human having sex with a dog? If you said both were unnatural I would agree, but surely you can see the levels in lowness?
--- End quote ---
if the dog is consenting, whats the difference?
if its a female dog, it could be good, depending on whether the pussy's tight 8)
Fraxxx:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 02:04:58 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 28, 2014, 04:05:10 AM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 28, 2014, 01:57:51 AM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
Why is that a low Fraxxx. If nobody gets hurt in the process and they don't bother you with it, who cares.
Or do we have got a norm? And if so, who decides these norms?
And how can they change?
That is a philosophical question my friend.
--- End quote ---
No it's not. You really want me to argue against zoophilia to the point where you can say "Hah, and the same goes for hoomooes!" (preferably in a British accent)? If you can't come up with something solid yourself I can't help you. I am against zoophilia and so are you, I presume. So I don't see the benefit in wasting my time on discussing it (Cause writing these textes is time-consuming, after all. For me, anyway). If someone truly would be in favor of it, I might argue against it. But you're just playing Devil's Advocate here to turn this around on me. Don't think so. Also wouldn't work :) The burden of proof is on you. Most basic scientific principle there is.
--- End quote ---
"there is no logical reason to be against it"
--- End quote ---
Who are you quoting? I definitely didn't say that regarding sex with animals.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version