Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Man's best friend
Fraxxx:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 11:14:47 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 29, 2014, 08:52:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 08:20:45 PM ---DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THERE IS NO LOGICAL ARGUMENT AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT CAUSES NO ONE ANY HARM?
--- End quote ---
That was one point, yes. Consent was another one. Why would you assume that a such a vast majority of interspecies sexual encounters met the requirements that allowed to make the same point for zoophilia in principle.
And why the hell are we argueing this in the first place? Like I said before:
"So if you want someone to advocate the legalization of sex with animals you gotta go look somewhere else. It doesn't change the fact that you can't come up with anything reasonable against homosexuality in particular one bit."
--- End quote ---
thats what i'm sayin, dogs consent to it all the time and theres no harm in it..."you cant come up with a reasonable argument against it"...in essence, you agree that it's okay for dogs to fuck human pussu. dont worry, i'm not here to judge.
--- End quote ---
Reeewind!
a) "Why would you assume that such a vast majority of interspecies sexual encounters met the requirements that allowed to make the same point for zoophilia in principle?"
b) "Repeat it as often as you want but I still never made a case for or against zoophilia."
Cause only because you can't let go of the idea that homosexuality or more precisely male homosexuality *cough*hypocrite*cough* is basically the same as zoophilia, it doesn't mean I'm all of a sudden, somehow miraculously obligated to find cons against the latter. As if the hypothetical case that I couldn't, would mean you're automatically right about homosexuality. That wouldn't even be the case if you were right about the two being principally the same. Logical fallacy.
You made the claim, you'll still have to come up with something reasonable against homosexuality itself. Burden of proof. Unlike homosexuality, no backdoor to that principle.
And of course, the dog is not to blame then. The responsibility would more lay
Sccit:
Im not assuming anything, I'm just saying that if, according to you, homosexuality is ok because of no harm done and consent, then consensual dog sex falls under the same category... That is all.
whoisthis:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 06:05:03 PM ---
SHOW ME WHERE IM JUSTIFYING BESTIALITY OR PEDOPHILIA?
WOULD U RATHER FUCK A MAN'S ASS OR A DOG'S PUSSY??
--- End quote ---
Refer to the other topic for your justification of Pedophilia.
As for Beastiality, here are your attempts at justifying it, when faced with comparing such an act to Homosexulaity
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 02:04:15 PM ---
so watching bestiality is low, but gay porn is not? GOT U
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 02:04:58 PM ---
"there is no logical reason to be against it"
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 02:25:55 PM ---
if the dog is consenting, whats the difference?
if its a female dog, it could be good, depending on whether the pussy's tight 8)
--- End quote ---
If the dog is consenting... Wow. When has a dog ever consented anything? Has a dog ever consented that they'd like to have their balls chopped off? Has a dog ever consented to having to sleep outdoors? Dogs cannot consent. You are trying to argue against some real and true (2 adults of the same sex consenting to have sex with each other) with a fictitious reasoning.
As for your question: Neither. I don't find men attractive and I do not find any animal attractive. I'm only attracted to women.
I think you're a bit fascinated by a "dogs tight pussy" and a "man's ass" since those seem to be the terms you use in your arguments non-stop. Is that true?
Sccit:
They're consenting by getting n stayin hard up in some tight human pussy
If a dog is horny and a hoe bends over naked in front of him, he'd fuck the shit out that tight pussy
And I don't know whether youre really slow or if ur just pretending to be slow for sake of argument, but I never justified anything.. I think dog sex and gay sex are both whack, that's the point. U the one trying to justify shit here, not me.
Fraxxx:
Dogs are a different, though. They're the result of man's god complex, created in our own image. ;D
Seriously, we are in particular responsible for what dogs are, so they are indeed a special case. I'm still confident that one can find enough points to argue against sex with them. Is anybody here in favor of sex with dogs? No? So why argue?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version