the LA LAkers are now the worst team in the west

[Hack Wilson - real]

nice try but you could have done a lot better

[Teddy Roosevelt]

2-I didn't see anything about the Celtics in this thread, what exactly do they have to do with the western conference?  or the Lakers being the worst team in the west?  thanks in advance for any elaboration 

LOL. It's kind of hypocritical of you to point this out. You'll find any excuse to mention how the Lakers/Kobe sucks in every thread NIK makes. How does it feel to be on the other side of that?

[Teddy Roosevelt]

don't worry, Kobe Jabbari Parker will take them to the playoffs when he returns 

Fixed.

[Hack Wilson - real]

2-I didn't see anything about the Celtics in this thread, what exactly do they have to do with the western conference?  or the Lakers being the worst team in the west?  thanks in advance for any elaboration 

LOL. It's kind of hypocritical of you to point this out. You'll find any excuse to mention how the Lakers/Kobe sucks in every thread NIK makes. How does it feel to be on the other side of that?

NIK is free to make "brooks owned the celtics" type of threads.  I could care less, I find them funny.

[Sccit]

yea, but then u act like a butthurt bitch when i show u that lakers>celtics in every which way

[Hack Wilson - real]

you can make up whatever stats you want




factz:


1-celtics are 9-3 in the nba finals against the lakers

2-anyone with a fucking brain knows Boston has one more title than the Lakers.  17 > 16.   make up all the petty crap you want but NBA.com even says 17 > 16. 

3-you mad

[Citizen-Y]

Fuck both your faggot ass franchises

 

[Sccit]

you can make up whatever stats you want




factz:


1-celtics are 9-3 in the nba finals against the lakers

2-anyone with a fucking brain knows Boston has one more title than the Lakers.  17 > 16.   make up all the petty crap you want but NBA.com even says 17 > 16. 

3-you mad

i know u a lil slow, but lets try one last time...nba.com doesn't recognize NBL titles. Lakers, as a franchise, have 17 titles. 1 in the NBL, 1 in the BAA, and 15 in the NBA....u can say whatever u want and try to base shit off technicalities, but thats the reality of the situation.

also, relevancy in every era means a lot more than winning 11 out of 16 titles in one era back when there was only 8 teams...


lakers have won titles in every era and have never had dry spells like the celtics...more all-stars, hall-of-famers....were better in every aspect. so u can hang on to that 17>16 technicality all u want, but any1 livin in reality knows whats good.

[M Dogg™]

The Lakers won an NBL title, which the NBA doesn't recognize. Just like the NBA doesn't recognize the ABA titles. Still, the Lakers have 17 titles, especially since they won the BBA (Later NBA) title the very next year after winning the NBL title. Also, prior to the merger the NBL did allow some black players to play, the BBA did not and 4 other teams besides the Lakers joined the BBA/NBL merged league, officially called the NBL. Too bad the NBA doesn't recognize that title. I think the Lakers should put it on the wall.

[Sccit]

The Lakers won an NBL title, which the NBA doesn't recognize. Just like the NBA doesn't recognize the ABA titles. Still, the Lakers have 17 titles, especially since they won the BBA (Later NBA) title the very next year after winning the NBL title. Also, prior to the merger the NBL did allow some black players to play, the BBA did not and 4 other teams besides the Lakers joined the BBA/NBL merged league, officially called the NBL. Too bad the NBA doesn't recognize that title. I think the Lakers should put it on the wall.

yea, the NBL was far more competitive than the BAA...it's all a technicality. the NBL and BAA merged to form the NBA, but since the owners of the BAA were the ones who officially bought out the NBL and not the other way around, they recognize BAA as the NBA and the NBL as a defunct league, despite the fact that more NBL teams were taken. It's a technicality, but in reality, we have 17 titles as a franchise.

[Hack Wilson - real]

lol @ crying over a meaningless title in 1947



the NBA recognizes it as 17-16 and no crybaby technicality is going to save that.  And being 9-3 against the Lakers in the finals is more proof that Boston is better 

[Sccit]

THE TECHNICALITY IS THAT IT DOESNT COUNT...IN REALITY, IT IS A TITLE JUST AS MUCH AS THE BAA CHAMPIONSHIPS WERE.

[Sccit]

How the Knicks get Shannon Brown and the Lakers didn't?

WE HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH GUARDS

[Hack Wilson - real]

blah blah blah



boston still owns LA in the finals 9-3, and 17 > 16.  live with these facts.  go Rondo.

[Sccit]

lol all those wins came in the 60s smh......17+31+34>17+21+21