Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

5th best player in the NBA poll

<< < (3/3)

Hack Wilson - real:

--- Quote from: Halu Sination on March 05, 2014, 08:15:56 PM ---How the fuck is Paul George #3? Was that poll taken in like the first month of the season or something?

--- End quote ---


i know, right???


i'd easily take Lebron, Durant, CP3, Blake, Aldridge, Curry and Love over Paul George

Halu Sination:

--- Quote from: Tanaka Power on March 05, 2014, 08:24:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: Halu Sination on March 05, 2014, 08:15:56 PM ---How the fuck is Paul George #3? Was that poll taken in like the first month of the season or something?

--- End quote ---


i know, right???


i'd easily take Lebron, Durant, CP3, Blake, Aldridge, Curry and Love over Paul George

--- End quote ---

I'm glad you named Curry as that's the name people usually leave out for whatever reason. I actually like Paul George a lot, but I would take every player you named over him, with only Aldridge being a coin flip (I think I would give George the edge but you couldn't go wrong either way).

People give Pacers way too much credit. Great team for sure but they stack wins over a horrendous Eastern Conference. Once play-offs start and the Heat wake up again, I imagine they will beat Pacers once again. If Pacers get by Heat, whoever comes out of the West is gonna beat the Pacers.

Sccit:
paul george was beastin 2 start the season...i guess he's experiencing some growin pains, cuz his inconsistencies are becomin a trend. i think granger was a better back-up in indiana than evan turner, who looks to hold the ball a lot and isolate. granger was more the type who could play off the ball and spot up for the open shot, which creates much better spacing on the court for george to operate. evan turner is like a paul george light. he will only cancel him out, not add to his game

Halu Sination:
Word I said the same thing when Pacers traded for Turner. Turner isn't like a Jamal Crawford or Nick Young where he could come off the bench and provide a spark. He actually played well today but for the most part, the dude isn't efficient enough to make himself useful as a role player off the bench. Most optimists' line of thinking was "Granger was playing so poorly that it didn't matter who they got in return as long as it was an expiring contract." While I could see where they're coming from, you have to factor in chemistry. Turner throws his team's offense completely off at times, and he doesn't play D to make up for it. There's a reason Philly wanted nothing to do with the guy.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page