Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
LeBron's Return To Cleveland May Fuck Them Over Worse than "The Decision" Did...
Sccit:
--- Quote from: DJ SUGAFREE QUIK on September 06, 2016, 01:08:34 AM ---
--- Quote from: Sccit on September 05, 2016, 11:13:08 AM ---Still has a losing finals record......
--- End quote ---
There have been some athletes out there who have been considered one of the greatest in their sport even though they had a losing record in championships. Gotta get to there in order to win one.
Jerry West
Elgin Baylor
John Elway
I know there's more but can't think of anymore now. Except for coach Tom Landry.
--- End quote ---
Yea and none of them (specifically in basketball) are typically regarded top 5 .. Usually not even top 10
Magic
Kareem
Michael
Kobe
That's your NBA Mount Rushmore based on winning, Individual accomplishments, and overall legacy all factored in
Notice there's no wilt chamberlain.. That's because if wilt didn't have a losing finals record, he'd be the consensus goat. Jerry west, Elgin Baylor, Oscar Robertson .. Same story. the only reason they not considered top 5 is because they haven't won enough. Individually, they were all the best at what they did.
Chamillitary Click:
LeBron's greatness shifted the culture. That's how you know how special & polarizing his greatness truly is.
It wasn't until the year 2003 that anyone even mentioned "how many rings you got?". That was a generic argument made up by guys like you who couldn't stomach the clear cut superiority of talent.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on September 13, 2016, 11:57:29 AM ---LeBron's greatness shifted the culture. That's how you know how special & polarizing his greatness truly is.
It wasn't until the year 2003 that anyone even mentioned "how many rings you got?". That was a generic argument made up by guys like you who couldn't stomach the clear cut superiority of talent.
--- End quote ---
FOH
How many rings U got is the reason players like Malone n Barkley ain't considered too 10 and the reason wilt ain't considered goat
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Sccit on September 13, 2016, 12:37:45 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on September 13, 2016, 11:57:29 AM ---LeBron's greatness shifted the culture. That's how you know how special & polarizing his greatness truly is.
It wasn't until the year 2003 that anyone even mentioned "how many rings you got?". That was a generic argument made up by guys like you who couldn't stomach the clear cut superiority of talent.
--- End quote ---
FOH
How many rings U got is the reason players like Malone n Barkley ain't considered too 10 and the reason wilt ain't considered goat
--- End quote ---
Na, it's all statistics. Sure, there is a legacy attached to certain players with rings; but if you got 'em, then there's no technical, internal, ring having war lol. Plenty of niggas have Larry or Magic the GOAT, they ain't getting into who got more; it becomes an eye test to a degree. Any nigga with half a brain can see the argument to be made of "Larry was better than Magic, he just kept running into the Lakers who were a better overall team". & nobody is flabbergasted if someone has the opinion that Larry is better than Magic. Or even if you think Magic is the GOAT, you don't say "But Jordan's six tho...".
Don't make me pull up quotes from years ago where all LeBron had to do was win rings...now your neurotic, insecure ass created a new standard of "what's the finals record tho..?" lmfao.
I'm waiting 'til the boy catches #6 & you start going on about "who did it in a shorter period of time tho...?"
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on September 13, 2016, 02:45:51 PM ---
--- Quote from: Sccit on September 13, 2016, 12:37:45 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on September 13, 2016, 11:57:29 AM ---LeBron's greatness shifted the culture. That's how you know how special & polarizing his greatness truly is.
It wasn't until the year 2003 that anyone even mentioned "how many rings you got?". That was a generic argument made up by guys like you who couldn't stomach the clear cut superiority of talent.
--- End quote ---
FOH
How many rings U got is the reason players like Malone n Barkley ain't considered too 10 and the reason wilt ain't considered goat
--- End quote ---
Na, it's all statistics. Sure, there is a legacy attached to certain players with rings; but if you got 'em, then there's no technical, internal, ring having war lol. Plenty of niggas have Larry or Magic the GOAT, they ain't getting into who got more; it becomes an eye test to a degree. Any nigga with half a brain can see the argument to be made of "Larry was better than Magic, he just kept running into the Lakers who were a better overall team". & nobody is flabbergasted if someone has the opinion that Larry is better than Magic. Or even if you think Magic is the GOAT, you don't say "But Jordan's six tho...".
Don't make me pull up quotes from years ago where all LeBron had to do was win rings...now your neurotic, insecure ass created a new standard of "what's the finals record tho..?" lmfao.
I'm waiting 'til the boy catches #6 & you start going on about "who did it in a shorter period of time tho...?"
--- End quote ---
Lmao lebron ain't gettin six homie
The consensus has magic over larry due to rings .. I duno what u goin on about . If magic had 7 he'd be considered the goat by the general public.
Simple science
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version