It's May 13, 2024, 01:42:30 AM
who gives a fuck about repeating?? if you win 5 titles does it really matter if none were back to back? hell no.and calling duncan and russell system players just proves my point at how stupid this discussion is, especially with Laker stans in it 3 lakers and no celtics on a mt rushmore? hahahaha that's a joke son.
Quote from: Hack Brodenheimer on May 20, 2015, 10:38:52 AMwho gives a fuck about repeating?? if you win 5 titles does it really matter if none were back to back? hell no.and calling duncan and russell system players just proves my point at how stupid this discussion is, especially with Laker stans in it 3 lakers and no celtics on a mt rushmore? hahahaha that's a joke son.def factors into how great you are...like i said, every1 knows the 2nd of a back-to-back is tougher than the 1st. duncan aint got what it takes to do it. simple science. russell was the 5th leading player on a championship teamduncan averaged under 30 minutes on a championship teamagain....system players (ESPECIALLY IN COMPARISON TO THE PLAYERS THEYRE NEXT TO) and realistically, i coulda had all lakers...thats how great our franchise is. replace mj with wilt and it's still a much more valid list than yours...but wilt didnt repeat, so i put mj.
lol nik thinks mt rushmore is a mt stanmoreJordan, Bird, Magic and Russell is the most logical "mt rushmore" but it's retarded because basketball has 5 players on the floor at a time, it's not a 4 player sport.and Bill Russell won all thoe MVP's for a reason
you can't have TWO centers on a Mt. Rushmore
who gives a fuck about repeating??
Quote from: Hack Brodenheimer on May 20, 2015, 10:38:52 AMwho gives a fuck about repeating??When you gonna realize all his criteria is just based off of what Kobe already accomplished? Lol.