Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
NIK's dumbest statement during these playoffs??
Chamillitary Click:
I'm sorry dude, I know you spent a little typing that out...but I had to stop reading after "LeBron not having enough was media fabrication" lol. There's just no point if you're that out of line. That's absurd.
Speaking of narratives, I get your whole "pretty much everyone who isn't a 'franchise player' would be 'awwwww man Draymond Green?!?'", but no lol, Mario Chalmers, Norris Cole, Shane Battier, Birdman, the list goes on of Miami Heat players who wouldn't have been shit for the last 4 years, turned into champions by LeBron. & those Miami players were better. Dellevedova will never start on an NBA team again unless all other options are on the DL, JR Smith sucks, James Jones can only shoot a three, Mike Miller today is too old, Thompson has zero offensive game, Mozgov is the only player worthy of a Finals roster & that's if he is the 4th or 5th option on the team. Iman can play defense, can't really do anything on offense unless he's created looks from pretty much being ignored. Kyrie & Love, like designed in the offensive scheme, yeah, they win. But like I said in another thread you...like usual...ignored because of how insane you'd have to be to argue it...no other team in NBA history could you have removed the 2nd & 3rd best players & that team would of still won the NBA Finals.
If you honestly & truly believe if one week before the Finals the Warriors & Cavs broke all trading deadline rules & traded LeBron for Steph & you think the Cavs would of still won...actually if you think the Warriors WOULDN'T have swept Curry on the Cavs, you're so lost, it's inexplicable.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on June 25, 2015, 02:24:55 PM ---I'm sorry dude, I know you spent a little typing that out...but I had to stop reading after "LeBron not having enough was media fabrication" lol. There's just no point if you're that out of line. That's absurd.
Speaking of narratives, I get your whole "pretty much everyone who isn't a 'franchise player' would be 'awwwww man Draymond Green?!?'", but no lol, Mario Chalmers, Norris Cole, Shane Battier, Birdman, the list goes on of Miami Heat players who wouldn't have been shit for the last 4 years, turned into champions by LeBron. & those Miami players were better. Dellevedova will never start on an NBA team again unless all other options are on the DL, JR Smith sucks, James Jones can only shoot a three, Mike Miller today is too old, Thompson has zero offensive game, Mozgov is the only player worthy of a Finals roster & that's if he is the 4th or 5th option on the team. Iman can play defense, can't really do anything on offense unless he's created looks from pretty much being ignored. Kyrie & Love, like designed in the offensive scheme, yeah, they win. But like I said in another thread you...like usual...ignored because of how insane you'd have to be to argue it...no other team in NBA history could you have removed the 2nd & 3rd best players & that team would of still won the NBA Finals.
If you honestly & truly believe if one week before the Finals the Warriors & Cavs broke all trading deadline rules & traded LeBron for Steph & you think the Cavs would of still won...actually if you think the Warriors WOULDN'T have swept Curry on the Cavs, you're so lost, it's inexplicable.
--- End quote ---
he had enough to win, son...thats why they won games 2 and 3. he had:
1.A GREAT TEAM DEFENSE (LOCK-DOWN PERIMETER DEFENDERS, RIM PROTECTORS)
2.KNOCK DOWN SHOOTERS TO SPACE THE FLOOR
3.EXCELLENT REBOUNDERS
4.LOW POST SCORING
IT'S NOT KWAME BROWN-SMUSH PARKER-LUKE WALTON LAKERS LIKE U KEEP ACTING.....U PUT MJ, KOBE, BIRD, MAGIC WIT THOSE GUYS, AND IT'S A SWEEP VS THE FUCKING WARRIORS....I MEAN, WARRIORS ARE GOOD, DONT GET ME WRONG. BUT THEYRE STILL THE FUCKIN WARRIORS. IT'S NOT SOME HALL-OF-FAME LINE-UP THAT CANT BE BEAT. THE FUCKIN GRIZZLIES WERE UP 2-1 ON THEM BEFORE CONLEY WENT DOWN. IF LEBRON IS WHAT THE MEDIA/GROUPIES BUILD HIM UP TO BE, HE WOULDA WON...BOTTOM LINE.
Chamillitary Click:
"No other team in NBA history could you have removed the 2nd & 3rd best players & the team would of still won the NBA Finals."
Sccit:
LAKESHOW MINUS PAU AND ODOM WOULDA STILL BEAT ORLANDO IN 2009 ON THE STRENGTH OF KOBE'S GREATNESS WITH:
PG FISHER
SG KOBE
SF ARIZA
PF POWELL
C BYNUM
SPURS WOULDA STILL SWEPT LEBRON'S CAVS IN '07 WITH:
PG BENO UDRIH
SG BRUCE BOWEN
SF MICHAEL FINLEY
PF ROBERT HORRY
C TIM DUNCAN
WHEN UR 2ND AND 3RD BEST PLAYERS ARE FRANCHISE PLAYERS, THEN IT SEEMS A LIL LESS LIKELY...BUT HIS TEAM WAS STILL CAPABLE SON.
whoisthis:
My dude, why aren't you saying that this team:
Fisher
Kobe
Ariza
Powell
Bynum
Would have beat the Celtics though?
Instead, what you're doing is saying that these teams:
Alston
Lee
Hedo
Lewis
Dwight
and
Gibson
Pavlovic
LeBron
Gooden
Big Z
Are equal to:
Curry
Thompson
Barnes/Iggy
Green
Bogut
And that's just flat out not true. If you're going to make these comparison, make them right. LeBron played a top notch team, so make your comparisons with other top notch teams. If Dwight didn't defend on that Magic team, who would have? Who would have stepped up and bailed them out? Nobody. If LeBron didn't do damn near everything on that Cavs team, who would have stepped up and bailed them out? Again, nobody. These are not elite teams. Now, take that Warriors team. When Curry wasn't scoring, Thompson was. Iggy was. When the team needed stops, Green stepped up. Iggy stepped up. Livingston stepped up. That's what elite teams do. So you're comparing weak teams to better your agenda of Pro-Kobe, Anti-LeBron and are completely ignoring the fact that LeBron played against a stacked team with the MVP.
Also, if PPG was the only factor in determining the greatest of a player, then AI should be considered one of the greatest ever. Bill Russell changed games with his defense. His defense was his offense. This dude out played Wilt Chamberlain regularly. Wilt was destroying teams (which of course, West needed his services to win that ring), but struggled to lead his team over Russell. Take Russell off that team and the Celtics are a footnote in history. They're probably the Knicks today. Take Sam Jones off the team, take Cousy off the team... maybe they lose a few Finals, but they still have plenty of hardware, thanks to Russell.
I know you're rivaling Vanessa when it comes to Kobe Fandom and you hate LeBron and the Celtics, but damn man, at least try to be objective.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version