Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
And NOW they LAKERZ: DEMarcus Cousin
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Sccit on June 25, 2015, 12:44:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: Remedy360 on June 25, 2015, 12:36:28 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on June 25, 2015, 11:58:33 AM ---Na, I hear Randle, Clarkson & #2 for Cousins.
That would be a rip off, but that would also be hilarious.
--- End quote ---
I've been hearing Randle and the #2 for Cousins. That alone would be stupid as fuck.
--- End quote ---
yes it would, randle is goin to be a BEAST. i dont even wana trade the number 2 for cousins straight up. randle for cousins straight up would be decent, but i'm interested to see what randle can become. if it was the number 2+number 27+nick young for cousins+number 6, i'm fuxin wit that.
--- End quote ---
lol @ number 6 too. Number 27 may or may not even play in the league after a year & Nick Young is a baby JR Smith, whose style of play is proven to be cancerous to a actual contending team.
So in theory the Kings would be trading the best center in the league & another potential stud for a younger, unproven, possibly someone who can equate Cousins type center & some dead weight. That would be ridiculous. Randle & #2 would be a lot, I can see #2 & Clarkson though for Cousins.
All shows how flawed the NBA system is though. They need to have free agency before the draft because there are so many variables. If the Lakers got Love or LaMarcus, I wouldn't mind packaging Randle in another deal. Or just in general, I'd draft Russell, not Jahlil if they landed one of those guys. Getting Rondo or Jimmy Butler, that changes things. Just silly the way the NBA does it.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on June 25, 2015, 02:38:08 PM ---
--- Quote from: Sccit on June 25, 2015, 12:44:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: Remedy360 on June 25, 2015, 12:36:28 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on June 25, 2015, 11:58:33 AM ---Na, I hear Randle, Clarkson & #2 for Cousins.
That would be a rip off, but that would also be hilarious.
--- End quote ---
I've been hearing Randle and the #2 for Cousins. That alone would be stupid as fuck.
--- End quote ---
yes it would, randle is goin to be a BEAST. i dont even wana trade the number 2 for cousins straight up. randle for cousins straight up would be decent, but i'm interested to see what randle can become. if it was the number 2+number 27+nick young for cousins+number 6, i'm fuxin wit that.
--- End quote ---
lol @ number 6 too. Number 27 may or may not even play in the league after a year & Nick Young is a baby JR Smith, whose style of play is proven to be cancerous to a actual contending team.
So in theory the Kings would be trading the best center in the league & another potential stud for a younger, unproven, possibly someone who can equate Cousins type center & some dead weight. That would be ridiculous. Randle & #2 would be a lot, I can see #2 & Clarkson though for Cousins.
All shows how flawed the NBA system is though. They need to have free agency before the draft because there are so many variables. If the Lakers got Love or LaMarcus, I wouldn't mind packaging Randle in another deal. Or just in general, I'd draft Russell, not Jahlil if they landed one of those guys. Getting Rondo or Jimmy Butler, that changes things. Just silly the way the NBA does it.
--- End quote ---
DUE TO BEHAVIORAL ISSUES, AND THE FACT THAT A COUSINS TRADE IS INEVITABLE, THE NUMBER 2 ALONE IS WORTH MORE THAN HIM....HOW MANY TIMES HAVE WE SEEN DISGRUNTLED PLAYERS TRADED FOR SCRUBS? KINGS WOULD BE LUCKY TO GET THE NUMBER 2 FOR HIM, SO THATS WHY THE NUMBER 6 COMES INTO PLAY...AND IN THIS YEARS DRAFT, THERES A BIG FALL-OFF FROM NUMBER 2 TO NUMBER 6. AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE PROLLY WONT GET COUSINS BECAUSE THE KINGS WONT DO WHATS BEST FOR THEM...THEYLL HOLD COUSINS AND END UP TRADING HIM FOR PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR MID-SEASON OR SOME SHIT.
DJ SUGAFREE QUIK:
--- Quote from: Back 2 Hack on June 25, 2015, 01:11:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Remedy360 on June 25, 2015, 12:36:28 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on June 25, 2015, 11:58:33 AM ---Na, I hear Randle, Clarkson & #2 for Cousins.
That would be a rip off, but that would also be hilarious.
--- End quote ---
I've been hearing Randle and the #2 for Cousins. That alone would be stupid as fuck.
--- End quote ---
yeah, the Kings would be retarded to trade a proven 24/12 guy for unproven rookies
--- End quote ---
And that's why its not gonna happen. DMC was wanting to go to the power forward slot & let WCS be the center. I was concerned myself when they drafted him. I felt for sacramento though. They paid up for a new arena & the best player on the team goes to their archrivals? That could not happen. The kings front office said they ain't trading him. Good thing that DMC matured some. Like somebody said in the past after Whaq got traded to Miami, 'YOU NEVER TRADE YOUR BIG MAN.'
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version