Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Peyton Manning sexually assaulted a woman in college.
Shallow:
A lot is sealed but a lot was reported in 1996 and Manning was never criminally charged. The guy who wrote the letter to him never said he sat on her face. The woman never said anything about him sitting on her face in 1996 in her deposition. And it wasn't breaking the agreement in the book it was defamation she sued for. If Manning had signed an agreement to not discuss the case it would have been an easy win in 2002 for her. But it wasn't. You also have to wonder why she wouldn't press criminal charged in 02 when she took him to court for defamation and accused him of sitting on her face with bare ass and testicles.
All I'm saying is there is more than enough to doubt both sides of the story and to just jump on one side is bias and not logical.
You can look up at least a dozen articles about this case in 96 and 2003. You can also look up the DRES report from 1996. It's not hard to find counter claims to her lawyers advocacy report.
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: Shallow on February 17, 2016, 06:41:10 AM ---A lot is sealed but a lot was reported in 1996 and Manning was never criminally charged. The guy who wrote the letter to him never said he sat on her face. The woman never said anything about him sitting on her face in 1996 in her deposition. And it wasn't breaking the agreement in the book it was defamation she sued for. If Manning had signed an agreement to not discuss the case it would have been an easy win in 2002 for her. But it wasn't. You also have to wonder why she wouldn't press criminal charged in 02 when she took him to court for defamation and accused him of sitting on her face with bare ass and testicles.
All I'm saying is there is more than enough to doubt both sides of the story and to just jump on one side is bias and not logical.
You can look up at least a dozen articles about this case in 96 and 2003. You can also look up the DRES report from 1996. It's not hard to find counter claims to her lawyers advocacy report.
--- End quote ---
Like mentioned before, the 1996 case Manning was just one example of 22 of incidents that caused her a hostel work environment. The suit wasn't against Manning, it was against the University, which the University settled and everything was suppose to be sealed and a settlement was reached. The 2003 case was a result of Manning writing about it in his book, and then she sued Manning for breaking the agreement which cost her her job and harm, so the Manning incident was just drove into further.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: M Dogg™ on February 18, 2016, 09:38:56 AM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on February 17, 2016, 06:41:10 AM ---A lot is sealed but a lot was reported in 1996 and Manning was never criminally charged. The guy who wrote the letter to him never said he sat on her face. The woman never said anything about him sitting on her face in 1996 in her deposition. And it wasn't breaking the agreement in the book it was defamation she sued for. If Manning had signed an agreement to not discuss the case it would have been an easy win in 2002 for her. But it wasn't. You also have to wonder why she wouldn't press criminal charged in 02 when she took him to court for defamation and accused him of sitting on her face with bare ass and testicles.
All I'm saying is there is more than enough to doubt both sides of the story and to just jump on one side is bias and not logical.
You can look up at least a dozen articles about this case in 96 and 2003. You can also look up the DRES report from 1996. It's not hard to find counter claims to her lawyers advocacy report.
--- End quote ---
Like mentioned before, the 1996 case Manning was just one example of 22 of incidents that caused her a hostel work environment. The suit wasn't against Manning, it was against the University, which the University settled and everything was suppose to be sealed and a settlement was reached. The 2003 case was a result of Manning writing about it in his book, and then she sued Manning for breaking the agreement which cost her her job and harm, so the Manning incident was just drove into further.
--- End quote ---
32 incidents. And balls on your head is a key fact that should not be left out of an affidavit you sign. I have seen no document that Manning signed any agreement in 1996/97. He signed an agreement in 03 and that was used to sue him again in 2005 for a news report she and her layers claim broke that agreement.
And what I said about it being criminal, is that if you take her 2003 account of it as factual then she had more than enough evidence to have filed a sex assault case against Manning in 03. It just doesn't all add up for me.
But what I am certain of is that most people that are reporting it now are reporting it with the intent to go after Manning and not the intent to uncover the truth.
Shallow:
http://www.foxsportsradio.com/onair/the-herd-with-colin-cowherd-56804/things-get-heated-between-jason-whitlock-14401636/
Here's a fun listen.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version