Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
THE CLIPPERS REMAIN THE CLIPPERS
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson - real on May 08, 2017, 08:11:28 PM ---Clippers were still a lot more exciting than the Lakers this year
who knows what happens in the off season but Steve Balmer has all that Microsoft $$$
--- End quote ---
I rather watch Ingram and d-russ developing over cp3 and blake digressing.
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Sccit on May 07, 2017, 12:58:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: DeeezNuuuts83 on May 07, 2017, 10:12:49 AM ---It depends on what you mean by "championship contender." Personally I don't view today's Clippers as being real contenders (assuming you meant that they had a decent chance at making it to the finals) in 2010 or earlier either.
--- End quote ---
he said they would ride on the 2010 lakers lmfao .. the same team that couldn't beat the jazz and lost a 3-1 lead to the rockets that was barely makin playoffs. at this point, he will say anything.
--- End quote ---
You can switch subjects to the 2010 Lakers vs the 2017 Clippers; that's not the point. That's not what you originally posted about. My fault for bringing your emotions into this trying to make a comparison.
Fact still remains, the full strength 2017 Clippers would of been a force pre-2010 & you want to blow them up because the two teams at the top are fifteen miles better than them & 27 other teams on top of that. It would be like saying we might as well blow up the Wizards core because they can't compete with the Cavs. Las Vegas is the all-telling. No bias, no lame opinions. The Clippers at full strength are never significant underdogs in any game; why blow up that consistency? Would trading Rivers, JJ & Crawford for Melo have made them better? Pursing KD harder last offseason? Yeah, no shit. But that's the only way the Clippers (or any team right there) is competing. Not restarting, but finding that piece. Look at your old posts, half of your wishes was landing a top free agent. That's all the Clippers are away & they still probably couldn't beat the Warriors.
If the Lakers ever lost the Blake Griffin equivalent, I'd hear excuses from April to tip off in October.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 15, 2017, 05:07:52 PM ---
--- Quote from: Sccit on May 07, 2017, 12:58:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: DeeezNuuuts83 on May 07, 2017, 10:12:49 AM ---It depends on what you mean by "championship contender." Personally I don't view today's Clippers as being real contenders (assuming you meant that they had a decent chance at making it to the finals) in 2010 or earlier either.
--- End quote ---
he said they would ride on the 2010 lakers lmfao .. the same team that couldn't beat the jazz and lost a 3-1 lead to the rockets that was barely makin playoffs. at this point, he will say anything.
--- End quote ---
You can switch subjects to the 2010 Lakers vs the 2017 Clippers; that's not the point. That's not what you originally posted about. My fault for bringing your emotions into this trying to make a comparison.
Fact still remains, the full strength 2017 Clippers would of been a force pre-2010 & you want to blow them up because the two teams at the top are fifteen miles better than them & 27 other teams on top of that. It would be like saying we might as well blow up the Wizards core because they can't compete with the Cavs. Las Vegas is the all-telling. No bias, no lame opinions. The Clippers at full strength are never significant underdogs in any game; why blow up that consistency? Would trading Rivers, JJ & Crawford for Melo have made them better? Pursing KD harder last offseason? Yeah, no shit. But that's the only way the Clippers (or any team right there) is competing. Not restarting, but finding that piece. Look at your old posts, half of your wishes was landing a top free agent. That's all the Clippers are away & they still probably couldn't beat the Warriors.
If the Lakers ever lost the Blake Griffin equivalent, I'd hear excuses from April to tip off in October.
--- End quote ---
the 2017 clippers woulda been swept by the melo-billups nuggets .. stop that
face it.. theyre weak. they are a melo away from even contending to be a contender
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version